• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Why on earth does Max have to complain about?
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
PorkchopExpress
28-04-2015
He stole the properties in the first place by tricking Ben, so why is he throwing a big tantrum now because he has had to give them back?

It's not like he has actually lost anything.

It's totally ridiculous.
srhgts
28-04-2015
The car lot was Max's to start with, so he has lost that. He's no right to complain though, he shouldn't have set out to con someone else in the first place. He shouldn't have taken advantage of a foolish, troubled boy to get back at his father.
firefly_irl
29-04-2015
His premise for the con was flawed given it was Nick not Phil who was the cause of Emma's death but Max kept up the war with Phil anyway even when Phil was exonerated.
olivej
29-04-2015
what I dont understand about the Car Lot - isnt David Wicks owner or co-owner or something?

surely Phil would need both signatures to take it
0...0
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by firefly_irl:
“His premise for the con was flawed given it was Nick not Phil who was the cause of Emma's death but Max kept up the war with Phil anyway even when Phil was exonerated.”

And not a peep about Roxanne who was actually driving the bloody car! Ok fair enough, the brakes were cut but if you were a grieving bloke lashing out, you would actually lash out at the driver!!
Firegazer
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by olivej:
“what I dont understand about the Car Lot - isnt David Wicks owner or co-owner or something?

surely Phil would need both signatures to take it ”

He would.
Tom_Willis
29-04-2015
I've got no sympathy for him. He's brought it all on himself.
doormouse1
29-04-2015
No sympathy at all for Max.

He fell for Phil's 'sting' re. the dodgy cars because he was beig sold the lie by an attractive blonde - he was thinking with his d**k as usual.

Perhaps he has learned his lesson, and will keep it in his pants from now on. The ageing roue act is wearing a little thin.
David_Archer
29-04-2015
What on earth why?
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Well the carlot was Max's not Phil's so he does have the right to complain about losing that and being jobless as a result, though I agree that he wouldn't be in this mess if he hadn't conned Ben out of the Arches to begin with.
CM2604
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by olivej:
“what I dont understand about the Car Lot - isnt David Wicks owner or co-owner or something?

surely Phil would need both signatures to take it ”

To take Max's share he'd just need Max's.

How much of the car lot does David actually own, it could just be a small stake.
The_Sleeper
29-04-2015
I would complain, if someone give me that " Black vest 'n' pants !!!
SteveOwen
29-04-2015
Max needs to have a full-on breakdown and then take steps to rebuild his life because as of now the character is so frustrating to watch.
Harry Redknapp
29-04-2015
But Phil conned the arches out of Ian. And now he stole Max business - and sole source of income- is Phil going to receive his comeuppance?
shrinkingviolet
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Harry Redknapp:
“But Phil conned the arches out of Ian. And now he stole Max business - and sole source of income- is Phil going to receive his comeuppance?”

Ofc not, it's Phil. No man, or woman, is allowed to best him.
joe gillott
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by PorkchopExpress:
“He stole the properties in the first place by tricking Ben, so why is he throwing a big tantrum now because he has had to give them back?

It's not like he has actually lost anything.

It's totally ridiculous.”

He's lost both the car lot and Abu but it was his fault tbh. Last night Phil although i still don't like him or how he always wins, hilarious!

Max brought it all on himself for taking advantage of Ben.
Kim_x
29-04-2015
My sympathy for Max is for the loss of the car lot, but only because Phil always ends up being top dog. As others have said, he shouldn't have carried on once he knew that Phil wasn't responsible. Max obviously took pleasure in it because he went to the prison himself to rub Phil's nose in it.

It's funny that he never questioned that Roxy was driving too fast, because I think she was. Surely her being the mother of his niece wouldn't stop him.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Kim_x:
“My sympathy for Max is for the loss of the car lot, but only because Phil always ends up being top dog. As others have said, he shouldn't have carried on once he knew that Phil wasn't responsible. Max obviously took pleasure in it because he went to the prison himself to rub Phil's nose in it.

It's funny that he never questioned that Roxy was driving too fast, because I think she was. Surely her being the mother of his niece wouldn't stop him.”

Same here but that's because; a) Car Lot belonged to Max and Phil had no right to take it. Two wrongs don't make a right and b) Max now has no job.
MarcoRossi
29-04-2015
it's Ben's attitude that's annoying, sitting up on his mighty high horse as if he was the one that resolved the whole archers issue, when in fact he is just a dumb, devious little boy that has done nothing good in his life
Kim_x
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Lizzie Brookes:
“Same here but that's because; a) Car Lot belonged to Max and Phil had no right to take it. Two wrongs don't make a right and b) Max now has no job.”

Absolutely.

Phil has taken it because of some misguided sense that the Mitchells should own it because they did before. Jack conned it out of Phil I believe so that may have been a factor, but as you say, two wrongs don't make a right and Max is no more responsible for it than Dot is that Nick cut the brakes; someone's family is not accountable for their actions.

I wonder how much longer the Mitchells will think they can throw people out of a pub they don't own.
bumpandgrind
29-04-2015
I know people on here hate the fact that Phil always has to win (it is a little annoying to be fair), but I'd rather see Phil winning that down and out. A broke Phil Mitchell? No thanks!
sorcha_healy27
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by bumpandgrind:
“I know people on here hate the fact that Phil always has to win (it is a little annoying to be fair), but I'd rather see Phil winning that down and out. A broke Phil Mitchell? No thanks!”

I do agree. I hate seeing Phil broke but I wish he could lose a fight for once.
joe gillott
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by bumpandgrind:
“I know people on here hate the fact that Phil always has to win (it is a little annoying to be fair), but I'd rather see Phil winning that down and out. A broke Phil Mitchell? No thanks!”

He needs to be broke imo. This bully attitude he has gone on far too long and has turned Phil into a panto character. Phil being paralyed permamently would be a brilliantly storyline I think.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by joe gillott:
“He needs to be broke imo. This bully attitude he has gone on far too long and has turned Phil into a panto character. Phil being paralyed permamently would be a brilliantly storyline I think.”

I agree.
dd68
30-04-2015
Max and Phil are as bad as each other, I like Max though
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map