DS Forums

 
 

Why on earth does Max have to complain about?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28-04-2015, 19:53
PorkchopExpress
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North Lanarkshire
Posts: 3,214

He stole the properties in the first place by tricking Ben, so why is he throwing a big tantrum now because he has had to give them back?

It's not like he has actually lost anything.

It's totally ridiculous.
PorkchopExpress is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 28-04-2015, 19:56
srhgts
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,564
The car lot was Max's to start with, so he has lost that. He's no right to complain though, he shouldn't have set out to con someone else in the first place. He shouldn't have taken advantage of a foolish, troubled boy to get back at his father.
srhgts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 11:06
firefly_irl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
His premise for the con was flawed given it was Nick not Phil who was the cause of Emma's death but Max kept up the war with Phil anyway even when Phil was exonerated.
firefly_irl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 11:14
olivej
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
what I dont understand about the Car Lot - isnt David Wicks owner or co-owner or something?

surely Phil would need both signatures to take it
olivej is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 11:17
0...0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
His premise for the con was flawed given it was Nick not Phil who was the cause of Emma's death but Max kept up the war with Phil anyway even when Phil was exonerated.
And not a peep about Roxanne who was actually driving the bloody car! Ok fair enough, the brakes were cut but if you were a grieving bloke lashing out, you would actually lash out at the driver!!
0...0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 11:24
Firegazer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Downtown
Posts: 5,810
what I dont understand about the Car Lot - isnt David Wicks owner or co-owner or something?

surely Phil would need both signatures to take it
He would.
Firegazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 11:36
Tom_Willis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,326
I've got no sympathy for him. He's brought it all on himself.
Tom_Willis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 13:22
doormouse1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 4,644
No sympathy at all for Max.

He fell for Phil's 'sting' re. the dodgy cars because he was beig sold the lie by an attractive blonde - he was thinking with his d**k as usual.

Perhaps he has learned his lesson, and will keep it in his pants from now on. The ageing roue act is wearing a little thin.
doormouse1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 13:26
David_Archer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 258
What on earth why?
David_Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 13:54
Lizzie Brookes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,318
Well the carlot was Max's not Phil's so he does have the right to complain about losing that and being jobless as a result, though I agree that he wouldn't be in this mess if he hadn't conned Ben out of the Arches to begin with.
Lizzie Brookes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 13:59
CM2604
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 157
what I dont understand about the Car Lot - isnt David Wicks owner or co-owner or something?

surely Phil would need both signatures to take it
To take Max's share he'd just need Max's.

How much of the car lot does David actually own, it could just be a small stake.
CM2604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 14:03
The_Sleeper
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 116,685
I would complain, if someone give me that " Black vest 'n' pants !!!
The_Sleeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 14:11
SteveOwen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the Wind
Posts: 28,373
Max needs to have a full-on breakdown and then take steps to rebuild his life because as of now the character is so frustrating to watch.
SteveOwen is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 14:17
Harry Redknapp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hiding from the taxman
Posts: 4,126
But Phil conned the arches out of Ian. And now he stole Max business - and sole source of income- is Phil going to receive his comeuppance?
Harry Redknapp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 14:23
shrinkingviolet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,233
But Phil conned the arches out of Ian. And now he stole Max business - and sole source of income- is Phil going to receive his comeuppance?
Ofc not, it's Phil. No man, or woman, is allowed to best him.
shrinkingviolet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 14:26
joe gillott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,526
He stole the properties in the first place by tricking Ben, so why is he throwing a big tantrum now because he has had to give them back?

It's not like he has actually lost anything.

It's totally ridiculous.
He's lost both the car lot and Abu but it was his fault tbh. Last night Phil although i still don't like him or how he always wins, hilarious!

Max brought it all on himself for taking advantage of Ben.
joe gillott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 14:33
Kim_x
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
My sympathy for Max is for the loss of the car lot, but only because Phil always ends up being top dog. As others have said, he shouldn't have carried on once he knew that Phil wasn't responsible. Max obviously took pleasure in it because he went to the prison himself to rub Phil's nose in it.

It's funny that he never questioned that Roxy was driving too fast, because I think she was. Surely her being the mother of his niece wouldn't stop him.
Kim_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 14:37
Lizzie Brookes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,318
My sympathy for Max is for the loss of the car lot, but only because Phil always ends up being top dog. As others have said, he shouldn't have carried on once he knew that Phil wasn't responsible. Max obviously took pleasure in it because he went to the prison himself to rub Phil's nose in it.

It's funny that he never questioned that Roxy was driving too fast, because I think she was. Surely her being the mother of his niece wouldn't stop him.
Same here but that's because; a) Car Lot belonged to Max and Phil had no right to take it. Two wrongs don't make a right and b) Max now has no job.
Lizzie Brookes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 14:44
MarcoRossi
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,633
it's Ben's attitude that's annoying, sitting up on his mighty high horse as if he was the one that resolved the whole archers issue, when in fact he is just a dumb, devious little boy that has done nothing good in his life
MarcoRossi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 16:41
Kim_x
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
Same here but that's because; a) Car Lot belonged to Max and Phil had no right to take it. Two wrongs don't make a right and b) Max now has no job.
Absolutely.

Phil has taken it because of some misguided sense that the Mitchells should own it because they did before. Jack conned it out of Phil I believe so that may have been a factor, but as you say, two wrongs don't make a right and Max is no more responsible for it than Dot is that Nick cut the brakes; someone's family is not accountable for their actions.

I wonder how much longer the Mitchells will think they can throw people out of a pub they don't own.
Kim_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 17:27
bumpandgrind
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London Town
Posts: 8,791
I know people on here hate the fact that Phil always has to win (it is a little annoying to be fair), but I'd rather see Phil winning that down and out. A broke Phil Mitchell? No thanks!
bumpandgrind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 17:33
sorcha_healy27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 69,009
I know people on here hate the fact that Phil always has to win (it is a little annoying to be fair), but I'd rather see Phil winning that down and out. A broke Phil Mitchell? No thanks!
I do agree. I hate seeing Phil broke but I wish he could lose a fight for once.
sorcha_healy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 18:47
joe gillott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,526
I know people on here hate the fact that Phil always has to win (it is a little annoying to be fair), but I'd rather see Phil winning that down and out. A broke Phil Mitchell? No thanks!
He needs to be broke imo. This bully attitude he has gone on far too long and has turned Phil into a panto character. Phil being paralyed permamently would be a brilliantly storyline I think.
joe gillott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-2015, 19:22
Lizzie Brookes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,318
He needs to be broke imo. This bully attitude he has gone on far too long and has turned Phil into a panto character. Phil being paralyed permamently would be a brilliantly storyline I think.
I agree.
Lizzie Brookes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-04-2015, 00:54
dd68
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 16,810
Max and Phil are as bad as each other, I like Max though
dd68 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:02.