Originally Posted by fawltytowers93:
“I keep seeing constant remarks saying: "Linda led Dean on, she's just to blame as he is", or "Mick and Linda are treating Dean appallingly, Team Dean all the way!", or "Ffs Linda just leave Dean alone, he's lost his granddad!"
I know its not real, but defending a rapist and and attempting to paint the victim as the villain is actually quite sick! I have a feeling people are only doing this because they think Dean is 'fit.'
I'm seeing it constantly on Twitter now, and it's really annoying me”
I would imagine that this is stupid little girls who fancy Matt and have an awful lot of growing up to do.
At least I would hope so! The thought that they might not be silly little girls fills me with horror
Originally Posted by GeekInfected:
“EastEnders is to blame. Rather than showing Dean as the monster he is, they are painting him to be a victim, which in turn is cultivating these worrying views in the fans of Dean / Matt di Angelo.
They should be ashamed of this mess they have created.”
I agree. The only way could have got off with this was if they didn't actually tell us if Linda had been raped or not and it was she said/he said.
Personally when he showed his bruises to Shirley I felt nothing. I didn't care. But then again I'm a middle aged woman who isn't swayed by his pretty face or 'feel sorry for me' facial expressions. But it's also because I keep first and foremost in my mind that he bent Linda over that table and took her even though she was saying no as if she was nothing then played mind games with her the next day as if it was consensual.
Originally Posted by bass55:
“I agree. It feels as if the writers are trying to create a sense of moral ambiguity when it comes to this story. Which is wrong, considering we actually saw Dean rape Linda. He simply cannot remain in the show.”
Exactly. I honestly don't know why this is so difficult to comprehend. Even if someone loves the character now they're going to have to face that many viewers are NEVER going to forget what he did. That he assaulted and violated someone in the worst way you can without actually killing them. He's a rapist, as simple as that. Doesn't matter if he loves his granddad and has other 'good' qualities, the bad thing he's done by far outweighs them.
Originally Posted by Lizzie Brookes:
“It's boring if you always have villains that are supposed to be hated and not necessarily true to life as not all criminals are monsters. If Dean was supposed to break the stereotypes surrounding rapists then he should have been written and acted ambigiously. If Dean was meant to be hated, then they should have shown him not caring about anyone like Finn O Connor/Frank Foster and reoffending, not shown him genuinely caring about Stan, Shirley etc.”
I never quite get what you mean when you say this. Are you talking about previous stereotypical soap portrayals of 'bad guys'? That they're generally nasty all the time so we know it and don't forget that they're the bad things they've done but in this case it's different?
Because in the real world loving family men have been exposed as rapists, even serial ones and their families had no idea. Hell, even Hitler loved his dog! People are complex beings and it's quite possible to love your granddad and go off it if anyone did anything to
him yet still commit rape, violating and brutalising a person and barely give it a second thought. Some people are strange.