• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
People on Twitter are constantly defending Dean and saying Linda is in the wrong
<<
<
3 of 5
>>
>
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“Hitler had a mother he probably loved that died. Perhaps we should absolve him of all his sins too?”

It's different.

Dean committed one horrific action but he was clearly mentally unstable and had been drinking. He was also in a state due t Shirley abandoning him and his personality had been shaped to some extent by his first prison stint. While it doesn't jutify or excuse what he did to Linda, these are reasons why it happened. Previously he was imprisoned for a non violent crime (framing Sean for something he didn't do) and got a warning for spiking Stacey's drink (though I don't think he did that with intent to rape and he told the truth when Bradley was arrested).

Hitler was a deranged, bigoted mass murderer not unlike Will Savage or Dr Browning. In Dr Browning's case I tried to understand when he initially confessed to Mercedes but couldn't forgive him when he tried to kill Myra and Cindy. Finn and Frank Foster both tried to rape others and Finn beat up Blessing too - It's Finn, Frank, Will, Dr Browning etc that are more like Hitler than Dean imo.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by fawltytowers93:
“I think Dean does know what he's done, that was made very clear during his confrontation with Linda at Stan's funeral.

But I don't think he realises what an evil thing rape is, and the true severities of it. Not that it makes it any better, of course.”

The writing's a bit messed up anyway. First they had Dean act like he thought it was a one night stand and then had him lie to Shirley about Linda saying no. I would have preferred them to go for the delusional angle myself as that is more interesting and ambiguous.

I do agree with the line in bold though.
srhgts
29-04-2015
I haven't seen any of the stuff on twitter but obviously it sounds utterly disgusting. What the hell is wrong with people. Being young is no excuse whatsoever, neither is fancying the actor.

Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“One of the many reasons I avoid Twitter. Its full of twits.

He's lost his granddad though - that's a classic one. They have only known each other less than a year LOL!”

They've known each other longer than that, it was made clear Dean had a relationship with Stan offscreen. Not that Stan's death does anything to excuse Dean being a rapist, obviously.

Originally Posted by Hankshaw:
“Its no surprise to me. You only have to see the messages defending Dan Osborne from TOWIE to see how messed up peoples views are on things like abuse and assault on women. Thats a real life issue so people sticking up for a soap character doesn't surprise me.”

What did he do?

Originally Posted by shrinkingviolet:
“The story started out well but their insistence on keeping Dean in has made it a complete mess. Instead of justice we see it considered acceptable for the rape victim to be intimidated and attacked constantly so it makes sense that idiots would use that as a justification for their view that she should just 'get over it'.

There's been similar stuff elsewhere - it's pretty sad.”

I agree.

Originally Posted by _NiallDEE_:
“lol that's so ridiculous considering Linda is being much more reasonable to Dean then she needs to be”

She really is. She has a level of compassion and empathy for him and Shirley that I doubt many would have.

Originally Posted by bass55:
“I agree. It feels as if the writers are trying to create a sense of moral ambiguity when it comes to this story. Which is wrong, considering we actually saw Dean rape Linda. He simply cannot remain in the show.”

I agree.

Originally Posted by fawltytowers93:
“I do understand what you're saying, but even complete monsters like Adolf Hitler probably genuinely cared for at least one person.

Just because someone shows care and consideration towards another, it doesn't make them a better person, or justify their actions.

And he HAS reoffended. He hasn't raped anyone else since, but he did hold Nancy captive and attempt to set the Vic alight. If Mick hadn't caught him in the act, who knows what he would've done”

Good point.

Originally Posted by lotty27:
“Perhaps he knows his wife and knows that she was just saying that to keep the peace (which is very Linda and probably why she didn't speak up about the rape for so long) so he didn't want her to have to be in the same room/vicinity as her rapist? Let's not forget he didn't ban Shirley, just Dean but Shirley decided to take a stand and not attend altogether. Perhaps he's also pissed off with his family that they've pretty much called Linda a liar, even old Stan, so he has the right to be bloody angry even if it's a pain to watch?

And let's not forget his own guilty conscience which is probably making him even more protective of Linda. He actually asked Linda to look after Dean while (as per) he was chasing after Shirley. He's also got them into a right pickle now financially by being guilt tripped by Shirley and then guilt tripping his wife into giving Shirley a part of the business etc so I don't think we can discount Mick's own guilt at leaving Linda vulnerable both psychically and even in their business which will be accounting for a lot of his behaviour.”

Good point.

Originally Posted by fawltytowers93:
“I think Dean does know what he's done, that was made very clear during his confrontation with Linda at Stan's funeral.

But I don't think he realises what an evil thing rape is, and the true severities of it. Not that it makes it any better, of course.”

I agree.
eejm
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Ell_Ren:
“I would much rather have seen the truth come to light earlier and seen Shirley dealing with the fact that her son raped her other sons wife - to see how that would feel for a mother knowing that - rather than just seeing her blindly defending Dean and shouting the odds. It would have given Linda Henry better material also.”

I'm thinking we might see more of this later. Shirley obviously realizes - but doesn't want to admit - Linda could be telling the truth about the rape. Shirley seems to be holding on very tightly to the possibility that Dean is being honest when he said it was consensual sex. I still think that she's doing this out of massive guilt for abandoning Dean multiple times, and that she sees that this situation is somehow her fault.

However, we get the idea that Shirley is supporting Dean right now whatever her motives. This story really needs to progress, and soon.
srhgts
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by lotty27:
“I would imagine that this is stupid little girls who fancy Matt and have an awful lot of growing up to do.

At least I would hope so! The thought that they might not be silly little girls fills me with horror



I agree. The only way could have got off with this was if they didn't actually tell us if Linda had been raped or not and it was she said/he said.

Personally when he showed his bruises to Shirley I felt nothing. I didn't care. But then again I'm a middle aged woman who isn't swayed by his pretty face or 'feel sorry for me' facial expressions. But it's also because I keep first and foremost in my mind that he bent Linda over that table and took her even though she was saying no as if she was nothing then played mind games with her the next day as if it was consensual.



Exactly. I honestly don't know why this is so difficult to comprehend. Even if someone loves the character now they're going to have to face that many viewers are NEVER going to forget what he did. That he assaulted and violated someone in the worst way you can without actually killing them. He's a rapist, as simple as that. Doesn't matter if he loves his granddad and has other 'good' qualities, the bad thing he's done by far outweighs them.



I never quite get what you mean when you say this. Are you talking about previous stereotypical soap portrayals of 'bad guys'? That they're generally nasty all the time so we know it and don't forget that they're the bad things they've done but in this case it's different?

Because in the real world loving family men have been exposed as rapists, even serial ones and their families had no idea. Hell, even Hitler loved his dog! People are complex beings and it's quite possible to love your granddad and go off it if anyone did anything to him yet still commit rape, violating and brutalising a person and barely give it a second thought. Some people are strange.”

Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“It's absolutely disgusting. Classic victim blaming. In no way did Linda ever 'lead him on'. She was just nice to him as a member of her extended family that she felt sorry for due to his relationship with his mother. Even if she had 'lead him on' re flirting (which she didn't but hypothetically) she still had a right to say no and have that respected when he made a move on her.

Sadly, i think it is because he is young, attractive and does sad eyes well. These silly little girls (I'm assuming they are mostly young) want him to stay in the show.

I just pray to God they never find themselves in a similar situation to Linda where they have 'lead an attractive man on' who thinks he has a right to take whatever he wants regardless of their feelings.”

Fantastic posts.

Originally Posted by Lizzie Brookes:
“In Dr Browning's case I tried to understand when he initially confessed to Mercedes but couldn't forgive him when he tried to kill Myra and Cindy.”

So it was completely fine that he murdered Lynsey?
shrinkingviolet
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by elliecat:
“not this again. Caring for his Granddad does not make his crime any less repugnant than any of those you have mentioned. I am sure Frank Foster loved his Mum and Dad too, just like I am sure Jack the Ripper loved someone.”

It's a joke, isn't it? Archie treated Roxy like a princess, it doesn't change what he did. Likewise Harry. ridiculous.
bass55
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“It's absolutely disgusting. Classic victim blaming. In no way did Linda ever 'lead him on'. She was just nice to him as a member of her extended family that she felt sorry for due to his relationship with his mother. Even if she had 'lead him on' re flirting (which she didn't but hypothetically) she still had a right to say no and have that respected when he made a move on her.

Sadly, i think it is because he is young, attractive and does sad eyes well. These silly little girls (I'm assuming they are mostly young) want him to stay in the show.

I just pray to God they never find themselves in a similar situation to Linda where they have 'lead an attractive man on' who thinks he has a right to take whatever he wants regardless of their feelings.”

Excellent post. As I have said before on this subject, I very much doubt that if Phil or Ian had been the rapist these idiots would be going to such lengths to defend them. But Dean is pretty so it's alright.

I'll give the writers credit for one thing, they really have exposed just how much victim-blaming culture, and in some cases blatant misogyny, is still very much a thing.
fawltytowers93
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by shrinkingviolet:
“It's a joke, isn't it? Archie treated Roxy like a princess, it doesn't change what he did. Likewise Harry. ridiculous.”

Archie didn't treat Roxy like a princess. It was him who paid Suzy to put the DNA test inside the Christmas cracker, to expose her secret to Sean and the whole family on Christmas Day and humiliate her. He knew his daughter was madly in love with Sean, and deliberately set out to tear them apart. He even asked Suzy to "make it as painful as ever."

That is NOT the actions of a loving father.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by srhgts:
“
So it was completely fine that he murdered Lynsey?”

Obviously killing Lynsey wasn't right but I did see how it happened - that it wasn't planned and very spur of the moment - it was similar in some ways to Joe/Pauline on EastEnders (although that wasn't actually shown) - it was perhaps unwise of her to provoke him the way that she did but he should either have controlled himself and left or handed himself in. (Assuming this was a real life scenario), I can imagine that if he had handed himself in and facedthe consequences for killing Lynsey I may have visited him in prison and not hated him but he crossed the line when he deliberately set out to harm Myra and Cindy, especially as that was more calculated/premeditated.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by fawltytowers93:
“Archie didn't treat Roxy like a princess. It was him who paid Suzy to put the DNA test inside the Christmas cracker, to expose her secret to Sean and the whole family on Christmas Day and humiliate her. He knew his daughter was madly in love with Sean, and deliberately set out to tear them apart. He even asked Suzy to "make it as painful as ever."

That is NOT the actions of a loving father.”

I agree. Archie was vile through and through. I don't remember him ever doing anything good.
Deschanel
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by bass55:
“I agree. It feels as if the writers are trying to create a sense of moral ambiguity when it comes to this story. Which is wrong, considering we actually saw Dean rape Linda. He simply cannot remain in the show.”

BIB: He could if they want him to. Home and Away did it with Kane: he raped Dani, then they made him a regular and had him fall in love with her sister Kirsty, and they went on to form a popular super-couple! Fans loved Kane, and berated Dani, the victim. And this was before Twitter ever existed.

I don't think they are trying to make it morally ambiguous, more trying to show that Dean and Linda's views on what happened differ. Emmerdale are doing that with Alicia/Lachlan, while keeping the truth of the story in tact. I don't think EE are doing it as successful, and have created a bit of mess of a story with how they are writing the characters, like Shirley, Buster, Denise and Babe. Even Stacey is being written in a way that detracts from the moral of the story - they should never have had her return to Blade's, b/c working for Shirley is no different to working for Dean, and it makes her look unreasonable, which in turn makes this story lose its main focus.

Dean shouldn't stay in the show long term (he really should have left already), and I hope they not only have him realize what he did, but that all who doubted Linda give her the apology she deserves (Shirley, Denise, Buster).
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Deschanel:
“BIB: He could if they want him to. Home and Away did it with Kane: he raped Dani, then they made him a regular and had him fall in love with her sister Kirsty, and they went on to form a popular super-couple! Fans loved Kane, and berated Dani, the victim. And this was before Twitter ever existed.

I don't think they are trying to make it morally ambiguous, more trying to show that Dean and Linda's views on what happened differ. Emmerdale are doing that with Alicia/Lachlan, while keeping the truth of the story in tact. I don't think EE are doing it as successful, and have created a bit of mess of a story with how they are writing the characters, like Shirley, Buster, Denise and Babe. Even Stacey is being written in a way that detracts from the moral of the story - they should never have had her return to Blade's, b/c working for Shirley is no different to working for Dean, and it makes her look unreasonable, which in turn makes this story lose its main focus.

Dean shouldn't stay in the show long term (he really should have left already), and I hope they not only have him realize what he did, but that all who doubted Linda give her the apology she deserves (Shirley, Denise, Buster).”

You have a point about Home and Away.

Babe has always been manipulative and self serving so I'm not sure that she's been written badly.

While Shirley standing by Dean is understandable, the way she sometimes behaves isn't.

I don't have a problem with how Buster and Denise are written.

Regarding Stacey, not only does Stacey naturally despise Dean but it's also unsafe for her to work in Blades when he is there. The same doesn't apply to Shirley though because apart from her occasionally obnoxious behaviour, she hasn't done anything wrong in the Linda/Dean situation. Also, she needs to earn a living and is refusing to work for Max (not that she can do that now anyway) so Blades was her only option and she does have Lily and Kat to think of.
kitkat1971
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Lizzie Brookes:
“It's different.

Dean committed one horrific action but he was clearly mentally unstable and had been drinking. He was also in a state due t Shirley abandoning him and his personality had been shaped to some extent by his first prison stint. While it doesn't jutify or excuse what he did to Linda, these are reasons why it happened. Previously he was imprisoned for a non violent crime (framing Sean for something he didn't do) and got a warning for spiking Stacey's drink (though I don't think he did that with intent to rape and he told the truth when Bradley was arrested).

Hitler was a deranged, bigoted mass murderer not unlike Will Savage or Dr Browning. In Dr Browning's case I tried to understand when he initially confessed to Mercedes but couldn't forgive him when he tried to kill Myra and Cindy. Finn and Frank Foster both tried to rape others and Finn beat up Blessing too - It's Finn, Frank, Will, Dr Browning etc that are more like Hitler than Dean imo.”

Well actually Hitler had a difficult upbringing due to being illegitimate and then had horrific experiences in World War 2. He was without a doubt also mentally unbalanced, partly due to his experiences shaping. He also had 'reasons' for being as he was. But that doesn't make what he did forgiveable in any way at all.

Of course he is an extreme example, i picked as an extreme an example as I could think of. The point i was trying to make is that the most evil of people can still love people close to them and grieve when they are hurt or die so Dean feeling upset over Stan's death shpuld not come into it at all re Linda and Mick needing to 'leave him alone' as many of his supporters seem to attest. It's like, he can't be all bad, he loved his Grandad so leave him be. Well of course he isn't all bad but that doesn't mean he should be 'let off' his despicable crime.
sorcha_healy27
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by joe gillott:
“Exactly my point. He barred Shirley and Dean from their own father/grandfathers funeral in spite. His selfish me me me act is disgusting and getting to the point where j want Dean tl kill him and go to prison for that.

Linda/Shirley/Tina don't need this stress on top of their grief.”

He barred them from the pub not the funeral
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“Well actually Hitler had a difficult upbringing due to being illegitimate and then had horrific experiences in World War 2. He was without a doubt also mentally unbalanced, partly due to his experiences shaping. He also had 'reasons' for being as he was. But that doesn't make what he did forgiveable in any way at all.

Of course he is an extreme example, i picked as an extreme an example as I could think of. The point i was trying to make is that the most evil of people can still love people close to them and grieve when they are hurt or die so Dean feeling upset over Stan's death shpuld not come into it at all re Linda and Mick needing to 'leave him alone' as many of his supporters seem to attest. It's like, he can't be all bad, he loved his Grandad so leave him be. Well of course he isn't all bad but that doesn't mean he should be 'let off' his despicable crime.”

I agree about Hitler.

I don't think I ever said Mick and Linda needed to "leave Dean alone" but I do think that Mick's continual anger and resentment doesn't help matters plus - he had no right to pick a fight with Buster or ban him from attending the funeral as Buster did nothing wrong.

Obviously in an ideal world Dean would be punished for the crime and given psychiatric treatment for his mental health issues but sadly there wasn't enough evidence to convict him or even bring the case to trial which was just unfortunate.

I'm glad you agree that Dean is not all bad but surely that explains why some viewers/posters don't hate Dean. Like I said, if Dean was supposed to be "hated" they shouldn't have given the impression that he is not all bad.
kitkat1971
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by fawltytowers93:
“I do understand what you're saying, but even complete monsters like Adolf Hitler probably genuinely cared for at least one person.

Just because someone shows care and consideration towards another, it doesn't make them a better person, or justify their actions.

And he HAS reoffended. He hasn't raped anyone else since, but he did hold Nancy captive and attempt to set the Vic alight. If Mick hadn't caught him in the act, who knows what he would've done”

Yes, this was the point I was trying to make - I hadn't seen it when I posted.

People like Frank Foster and Finn O'Conner were portrayed as monsters, almost pantomime villains which destroyed the storylines for me. It made it completely unbelievable as people aren't like that, real life rapists do not sit there twirling their metaphorical mustache. There probably are people they demonstrate genuine care, love and affection towards.

It is okay to have some sympathy towards Dean for some of his experiences and to have some understanding as to what has made him into what he is but it is not okay to turn that into blaming the victim or trying to excuse his actions.
kitkat1971
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Lizzie Brookes:
“I agree about Hitler.

I don't think I ever said Mick and Linda needed to "leave Dean alone" but I do think that Mick's continual anger and resentment doesn't help matters plus - he had no right to pick a fight with Buster or ban him from attending the funeral as Buster did nothing wrong.

Obviously in an ideal world Dean would be punished for the crime and given psychiatric treatment for his mental health issues but sadly there wasn't enough evidence to convict him or even bring the case to trial which was just unfortunate.

I'm glad you agree that Dean is not all bad but surely that explains why some viewers/posters don't hate Dean. Like I said, if Dean was supposed to be "hated" they shouldn't have given the impression that he is not all bad.”

I wasn't saying that you personally had said that Mick and Linda should leave him alone but referring to those people on Twitter that are doing so. I'm pretty sure you've never implied that Linda lead him on in any way.

I've just addressed feeling sympathy or understanding for him in another post. Also why i wouldn't have wanted him portrayed in the panto baddie way Frank or Finn were.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Twitter's a very dodgy invention imo. I am quite shocked that some people on it blame Linda for Dean raping her but I think it's pointless for us to have a heated debate over that. Luckily those posters are in the minority.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“Yes, this was the point I was trying to make - I hadn't seen it when I posted.

People like Frank Foster and Finn O'Conner were portrayed as monsters, almost pantomime villains which destroyed the storylines for me. It made it completely unbelievable as people aren't like that, real life rapists do not sit there twirling their metaphorical mustache. There probably are people they demonstrate genuine care, love and affection towards.

It is okay to have some sympathy towards Dean for some of his experiences and to have some understanding as to what has made him into what he is but it is not okay to turn that into blaming the victim or trying to excuse his actions
.”

BIB - I agree.
Deschanel
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Lizzie Brookes:
“You have a point about Home and Away.

Babe has always been manipulative and self serving so I'm not sure that she's been written badly.

While Shirley standing by Dean is understandable, the way she sometimes behaves isn't.

I don't have a problem with how Buster and Denise are written.

Regarding Stacey, not only does Stacey naturally despise Dean but it's also unsafe for her to work in Blades when he is there. The same doesn't apply to Shirley though because apart from her occasionally obnoxious behaviour, she hasn't done anything wrong in the Linda/Dean situation. Also, she needs to earn a living and is refusing to work for Max (not that she can do that now anyway) so Blades was her only option and she does have Lily and Kat to think of.”

I'm not saying Babe is being written out of character or anything, but when you have her act the way she does with Team Dean, at the same time that Dean actually has a team, it comes across as too much. It's also difficult to judge who she believes, which makes it worse.

Shirley is Dean's a mother, and is wanting to defend him (more so out of past guilt I would imagine), but they don't have her act in a sympathetic way. She always victimises herself in every situation. How she treats people is just appalling.

Buster and Denise are there to prop Team Dean. Denise in particular was quite unpleasant to Linda, which is why I hope she apologises when the truth is revealed. Buster has breezed into town, and automatically taken Dean's side. I prefer characters to be more rounded than what Buster is; he just Shirley's lap dog.

There's not much morally different between Stacey working for a rapist and working for the rapist's mother who openly supports her rapist son. It's hypocritical for Stacey to have gone back to Blade's in the first place. Lily and Kat will always be her priorities whether she's working with Dean or Shirley, that will not change. Stacey had no where else to work before, and that hasn't changed now. She needs to get her principles in order and stick to them.

I really hate that they've ruled out Dean facing legal justice, b/c all it leaves is a redemption arc, where Dean realizes the error of his ways and apologises to Linda, which she accepts (I'm ruling out him being killed, as they've played that story twice already).
kitkat1971
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Lizzie Brookes:
“I meant he hasn't raped anyone else. True, he did try to set fire to the pub and held Nancy captive but he didn't go through with it and it's pretty rubbish writing imo. They should have had him disappear after the showdown with Mick and then arrive back with Buster.

Obviously nothing can justify Dean raping Linda but the fact that he is capable of caring about certain people does differentiate him from Finn and Frank Foster who imo didn't care about anyone. It's easier to hate those types.

Besides, hating or not hating a fictional character is purely subjective. why do we get people who hate a certain character criticising those who don't hate that character. why not just agree to differ. All we can really agree on is that Dean committed a horrific crime which he should have been punished for.”

Of course liking or hating different characters is subjective and there shouldn't be any harm in it except in this case it is tipping over into the very real issue of rape and victim blaming and I think many are concerned at how real life rape victims would feel about that and perhaps scared that some of these attitudes aren't just about fiction but real life people. Would these people automatically side with a man accused of rape because he was young, attractive and showed he cared about other people whilst vilifying the alleged victim?

I'm not saying they would but that is the worry and why it can't be the same as people having differing opinions over a 'villain' like JR Ewing.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by kitkat1971:
“Of course liking or hating different characters is subjective and there shouldn't be any harm in it except in this case it is tipping over into the very real issue of rape and victim blaming and I think many are concerned at how real life rape victims would feel about that and perhaps scared that some of these attitudes aren't just about fiction but real life people. Would these people automatically side with a man accused of rape because he was young, attractive and showed he cared about other people whilst vilifying the alleged victim?

I'm not saying they would but that is the worry and why it can't be the same as people having differing opinions over a 'villain' like JR Ewing.”

I see your point, and yes I agree that the posts blaming Linda are disturbing.
Lizzie Brookes
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by Deschanel:
“I'm not saying Babe is being written out of character or anything, but when you have her act the way she does with Team Dean, at the same time that Dean actually has a team, it comes across as too much. It's also difficult to judge who she believes, which makes it worse.

Shirley is Dean's a mother, and is wanting to defend him (more so out of past guilt I would imagine), but they don't have her act in a sympathetic way. She always victimises herself in every situation. How she treats people is just appalling.

Buster and Denise are there to prop Team Dean. Denise in particular was quite unpleasant to Linda, which is why I hope she apologises when the truth is revealed. Buster has breezed into town, and automatically taken Dean's side. I prefer characters to be more rounded than what Buster is; he just Shirley's lap dog.

There's not much morally different between Stacey working for a rapist and working for the rapist's mother who openly supports her rapist son. It's hypocritical for Stacey to have gone back to Blade's in the first place. Lily and Kat will always be her priorities whether she's working with Dean or Shirley, that will not change. Stacey had no where else to work before, and that hasn't changed now. She needs to get her principles in order and stick to them.

I really hate that they've ruled out Dean facing legal justice, b/c all it leaves is a redemption arc, where Dean realizes the error of his ways and apologises to Linda, which she accepts (I'm ruling out him being killed, as they've played that story twice already).”

I agree that it's frustrating that Dean is not facing legal justice. If they wanted to redeem him, they could easily have done it through imprisonment and rehabilitation and maybe him admitting and apologising to Linda and managing to salvage his relationships with Buster, Shirley, Denise and possibly Carly (if she were brought into it)

I agree about Babe and Shirley but I don't think Denise was especially cruel - at least not in the same way Shirley was.

While there may not be much difference morally between whether Stacey works for Dean or Shirley, at the end of the day as you rightly said, Kat and Lily are her priorities and principles cannot pay bills or buy food and shelter - that's partly why in Coronation Street so many factory workers initially went to work for Frank until Michelle gave them their jobs back. But there is one point - it would be dangerous to work for Dean as he is a rapist but it's not dangerous to work for Shirley because she isn't.
kitkat1971
29-04-2015
Originally Posted by MarcoRossi:
“exactly this, with poor mental state being held accountable for rape but Mick's mental state (which must be that of disappointment, anger, failure and so much more) completely disregarded.”

I'd add impotence into that as well. Mick is powerless to protect Linda from Dean's continued presence (which whether he means it to or not is a torment for Linda) or get him punished. He also probably feels guilty for telling Linda to comfort Dean whilst he was off looking for Shirley.

Plus, he has the head ++++ of having discovered his sister is his mother and he's been dealing with his father dying as well.

Mick isn't helping matters in many ways but why can't people see that his head is in as big a mess as Dean's was the night of the attack? If you have sympathy for one, you must also have it for the other one surely?
Ethan_Scott
29-04-2015
Sadly this is the outcome when you have a good looking guy depicted as the rapist.
<<
<
3 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map