DS Forums

 
 

DTC creates another messed up storyline with Kat's unknown twin baby


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-05-2015, 21:04
Sweet_Princess
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 10,830

DTC creates another messed up storyline with Kat's unknown twin baby which could be Sean Slater like WTF how can that be possible? surely she would of known she had twins. And Sean being the twin brother cant be right
Sweet_Princess is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 01-05-2015, 21:08
Firegazer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Downtown
Posts: 5,810
"which could be Sean Slater"

-.-
Firegazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:10
lordOfTime
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: County Durham
Posts: 15,062
It's more likely that the twin *isn't* Sean given that Jean is his mum!
lordOfTime is online now Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:13
Ell_Ren
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
I agree. I don't usually jump the gun and wait for stories to play out - but this is ridiculous.
Ell_Ren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:14
Sally77
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 725
My only thing with Sean being the twin, when he was in it, it was assumed he had the bipolar condition like Stacey and Jean.

Also, if Sean was Kats son, in her funny moments, wouldn't Jean have said something like "Sean isn't my son" or something like that?
Sally77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:16
Get Den Watts
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,237
It's more likely that the twin *isn't* Sean given that Jean is his mum!
Jean's doolally so that bit of history can easily be changed. Maybe she just imagined giving birth to Sean.
Get Den Watts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:16
Sally77
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 725
I agree. I don't usually jump the gun and wait for stories to play out - but this is ridiculous.
I agree too! I did another thread where people were moaning that I hadn't given the SL enough time! The original part of this story has been going on for 15 years and they have just changed the core of it!
Sally77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:17
Sally77
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 725
Jean's doolally so that bit of history can easily be changed. Maybe she just imagined giving birth to Sean.
True! So we will have Jean imagining giving birth to a baby and Kat never knowing she gave birth to baby!!
Sally77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:18
vald
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
My only thing with Sean being the twin, when he was in it, it was assumed he had the bipolar condition like Stacey and Jean.

Also, if Sean was Kats son, in her funny moments, wouldn't Jean have said something like "Sean isn't my son" or something like that?
He was the one who was afraid that he could be like his mum.
vald is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:19
0...0
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
Jean's doolally so that bit of history can easily be changed. Maybe she just imagined giving birth to Sean.
They were all high on magic mushrooms!
0...0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:20
DUNDEEBOY
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,342
I don't like the way this producer seems to be rewriting eastenders history, he needs to go as soon as possible
DUNDEEBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:21
lordOfTime
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: County Durham
Posts: 15,062
Jean's doolally so that bit of history can easily be changed. Maybe she just imagined giving birth to Sean.
She's Bipolar. Not "doolally".

She did not imagine giving birth!

EE wouldn't go there!
lordOfTime is online now Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:21
rhys_soapfan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 64

we all know she has Bert and Ernie but now she has Zoe and unknown. I know there are two different fathers but hell this must be rare but what the heck sure its a soap :)
on another note I hope to god they don't make Sean the mystery son. I am sick to death of family trees changing just for a storyline. we already have had Shirley turning out to be micks mum which in my opinion should never have been done and now it looks like Kathy's husband Gavin will turn out to be Sharon's dad which would make a brilliant dynamic but it is just ott. btw brilliant acting from Jessie Wallace tonight.
rhys_soapfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:21
GeekInfected
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: EastLUNDERN
Posts: 6,247
DTC is slowly morphing into Kirkwood.

- Numerous baby plots.
- Celebrity stunt casting.
- Far-fetched unlikelihoods.
GeekInfected is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:22
NoughtiesMusic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,124
They were all high on magic mushrooms!
Or sausage surprise.
NoughtiesMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:25
BadLadAsh
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,076
It'll be just too much if it turns out to be Sean!
BadLadAsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:26
Get Den Watts
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,237
She's Bipolar. Not "doolally".

She did not imagine giving birth!

EE wouldn't go there!
EE has "gone there" a lot under DTC: bringing Kathy back from the dead, magicking up a secret son for Shirley (and convoluted, nonsensical timeline and backstory to go with it), magicking up a son for Kat/twin brother for Zoe, having Lucy being offed by "Damien" Beale.
Get Den Watts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:28
kitkat1971
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 23,466
I'm not sure it is all that rare. My god mother had a twin brother and two of her elder sisters were also twins. So basically, :er Mum had 7 children which included two sets of twins. My godmother went on to have twins herself.

If a woman produces two eggs each cycle, it isn't that odd that both eggs should be fertislised, resulting in twins.
kitkat1971 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:30
Get Den Watts
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,237
FWIW, the Federers have two sets of twins.
Get Den Watts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:31
Jimmy Skitz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Leicester
Posts: 2,583
I bet it would be more common but when people have twins the desire to have more kids is probably lessened
Jimmy Skitz is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:32
SteveOwen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the Wind
Posts: 28,373
FWIV, the Federers have two sets of twins.
I came in here to post the same thing.

It does happen, although statistically it is pretty rare.
SteveOwen is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:33
joe gillott
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Master of all fit EE males
Posts: 6,529
Twins are more common from a family where someone has a had twins before and more likley to be passed down mainly down the female decentants. Charlie/Harry/violet any of them could be twins or their parents?
joe gillott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:41
Sylvia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
I knew someone who was a member of a family with three sets of twins - 2 girls, 2 boys and a boy and a girl.
Sylvia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:49
VIP101
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,442
It's more likely that the twin *isn't* Sean given that Jean is his mum!
Have you not seen how the rewrite history with Zoe being a twin? Kathy being alive? I'm pretty sure they can rewrite history so Jean adopted Sean. It really isn't rocket science! What a silly comment!
VIP101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2015, 21:55
Knives326
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 172
DTC just couldn't resist another stupid retcon, could he?

We've had Shirley and her re-written past, Nick Cotton's never before mentioned wife and son, Shabnam having a baby by Dean when he wasn't even in town at the time she supposedly fell pregnant and the implausible, still to be explained resurrection of Kathy. And now this utter nonsense. And why? What was the urgent need for another long lost offspring plot anyway?

The line has well and truly been crossed. What's this idiot going to dream up next, I wonder? The arrival of the third Mitchell brother who the family disowned in the 80s and vowed never to speak about again?

Can't believe people are praising this. I'm sure if something like this happened in Coronation Street, the forum would rip the storyline to shreds.
Knives326 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:55.