|
||||||||
Characters you'd like to see return in Series 9 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 201
|
Quote:
The Reapers definitely have the potential to return. I wish I was showrunner because I know exactly how I'd bring them back.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
No need to create any CGI either, just take a short clip from fathers day and reuse it for a whole episode.
Yes, it would feature the Reapers and the Titanic. |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,428
|
I would prefer a series with all new monsters and villians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
I would prefer a series with all new monsters and villians.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Me too. My fingers will remained forever crossed.
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
I would argue the media already objectifies women anyway and always has done. Why change something that works?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
You're an actual idiot. Not long ago you were justifying child porn and now you're saying objectifying women is fine too. You're disgusting.
Surely you yourself have watched a TV show and thought 'Cor! That woman would look sexy in the shower!'? |
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
It's not that it's 'fine' as such, it's that so many media companies do it anyway. It's just the way the media works.
Surely you yourself have watched a TV show and thought 'Cor! That woman would look sexy in the shower!'? More just the fact you said "cast X cos she's bang tidy" and then threw on "great actress" like an afterthought or as though a secondary comment. Disgusting. She looks great, she's pretty, all the rest, sure, but I wouldn't gunna go around saying "hey, I'd cast X cos she's bang tidy". Christ, DB. You're paying nine grand for education presumably - so get some. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
"Just the way the media works", is basically you going "yeah, they do it, so it's fine." Just without you having to say it. And then saying "I'd cast X cos she's bang tidy (placing that BEFORE you say she's a good actor... or indeed saying it to begin with... is you clearly believing it's fine. That comment alone is you agreeing that it's fine. So yay for championing and objectifying women as sexual objects! How progressive. Just cos the media does it, doesn't make it right. In fact, that's why we should be more against the damn thing. You're totally clueless and, like I said, actually quite disgusting with some things you come out with.
More just the fact you said "cast X cos she's bang tidy" and then threw on "great actress" like an afterthought or as though a secondary comment. Disgusting. She looks great, she's pretty, all the rest, sure, but I wouldn't gunna go around saying "hey, I'd cast X cos she's bang tidy". Christ, DB. You're paying nine grand for education presumably - so get some. Besides, male actors are objectified just as much as female ones currently but you don't get people complaining about that. |
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
It's alright saying it's something that needs to be stopped but how do you stop?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3,703
|
Quote:
It's hard not to objectify women. It's alright saying it's something that needs to be stopped but how do you stop? .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
By not saying stuff like "I'd cast X cos she's bang tidy" for starters...
I'm sure plenty of women would cast some male actor they find attractive. Again, I'm not saying objectifying is fine but it's something that has been proven to work and if you were a TV/film company, you would risk losing a lot of your audience if you deliberately cast against that. Wonder how many viewers watched Transformers because of Megan Fox? Even our beloved Doctor Who does it. True, she still has a strong role but Jenna Coleman applies to being there for the male viewpoint as opposed to for someone for women to gaze at. |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
It's not hard - try a little self control and have some respect for other people.
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 612
|
Dalekbuster, sometimes you need to accept when you're wrong or when you've said something daft and just stop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
Surely it's showing more respect for other people by saying they're pretty online than if you said 'God, that actor is ugly'?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Saying someone is pretty or good-looking is a bit more respectful than "m8 she's bang-tidy." Starting to wonder if you even know what said phrase means, given you seem to think "bang tidy" is just another way of calling a girl (or whomever) pretty.
People use it plenty of times in modern conversation and I'm not referring to annoying chavs here. |
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
I know what it means. It's Kieth Lemon's phrase for a woman who's sexy, which is pretty much the same as calling a woman pretty IMO.
'Sexy' means 'sexually attractive or exciting.' That is not the same as 'pretty.' (Be honest, you heard KL use the phrase and thought it socially acceptable to adopt said phrase without actually learning what you're saying by using it. It's not smart or cool either. There's a difference in the way KL says it to you using it in day-to-day life.) Quote:
People use it plenty of times in modern conversation and I'm not referring to annoying chavs here.
Please stop. |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3,703
|
Quote:
I know what it means. It's Kieth Lemon's phrase for a woman who's sexy, which is pretty much the same as calling a woman pretty IMO.
People use it plenty of times in modern conversation and I'm not referring to annoying chavs here. BTW, do you have a girlfriend? |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
BTW, do you have a girlfriend? |
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
No. But I don't give a **** about romance like everyone else does (who seem to spend every bloody day looking for a new boyfriend or girlfriend).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3,703
|
Quote:
No. But I don't give a **** about romance like everyone else does (who seem to spend every bloody day looking for a new boyfriend or girlfriend).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,087
|
You can't stop talking...
Quote:
I know what it means. It's Kieth Lemon's phrase for a woman who's sexy, which is pretty much the same as calling a woman pretty IMO.
Next you'll be comparing Elmer Fudd with Chas & Dave... |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 266
|
From the last series, definitely Seb. I love him. GUS was great value, too.
Otherwise - River Song. She'd have fantastic chemistry with Twelve. As would Captain Jack Harkness. Imagine the flirting! Leela, Tegan and Donna would be fab, too, because Twelve seems fondest of people who challenge him the most.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Steven Moffats pantry
Posts: 8,808
|
Quote:
No wonder. Even if you did, I bet people would happily stay well away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,236
|
Quote:
Quite a nasty thing to say and notably considerably more offensive than anything Dalekbuster has said. Coming across as a bit of a sanctimonious individual I'm afraid and your constant 'oh so superior' prodding of said forum member is bordering, note I said bordering, on what I would consider bullying. It's certainly highly unpleasant and I would suggest you stop picking on easy targets.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:10.





Leela, Tegan and Donna would be fab, too, because Twelve seems fondest of people who challenge him the most.