• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
  • Soaps Appreciation
Brendan Brady (Emmett J. Scanlan) Fan Thread! (Part 196)
<<
<
10 of 485
>>
>
ardluck
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by Daphne G:
“S2 was so much better than S1, so it's disappointing that there won't be a S3.

On the bright side, that means that they won't have a chance to kill off Icarus, so Pythacarus can live happily ever after! Also, Jason won't be cheating on his wife who he is supposedly in love with. The Jason/Medea storyline has made me really dislike Jason because Ariadne deserves better than that. It's a shame that Delmos died because Ariadne and Delmos would have made a nice couple.”

Oh yes I agree with you there.

In my mind, Delmos is resurrected and finds love. Jason and Medea die tragically and the rest all live happy ever after. The End.
Ready Steady Go
17-05-2015
I just braved an interview with James and Kieron at the BSAs. Luckily there's absolutely nothing shippy. I should have known

Kieron's beautiful. I want Brendan to stroke the stubble and run his tongue over the Bambi lashes
Celine3028
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by Ready Steady Go:
“I just braved an interview with James and Kieron at the BSAs. Luckily there's absolutely nothing shippy. I should have known ”

You brave soul. Thank You for that. I'm still struggling after watching their last scene together (i was tricked) so i would have never found the strength to watch it
AnotherSarah
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by Ready Steady Go:
“I just braved an interview with James and Kieron at the BSAs. Luckily there's absolutely nothing shippy. I should have known

Kieron's beautiful. I want Brendan to stroke the stubble and run his tongue over the Bambi lashes ”

'Hints that they might get back together in the future.'
Ready Steady Go
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by Celine3028:
“You brave soul. Thank You for that. I'm still struggling after watching their last scene together (i was tricked) so i would have never found the strength to watch it ”

You're welcome

Oh no How were you tricked?
Celine3028
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by Ready Steady Go:
“You're welcome

Oh no How were you tricked?”

What else? A beautiful gifset. I just had to see the boy... and then the horror... *clings*
Celine3028
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by AnotherSarah:
“'Hints that they might get back together in the future.' ”

Ready Steady Go
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by Celine3028:
“What else? A beautiful gifset. I just had to see the boy... and then the horror... *clings*”

Always the way

You poor thing.

Originally Posted by AnotherSarah:
“'Hints that they might get back together in the future.' ”

I'm not that surprised - I think Hollyoaks will keep the opportunity there in case Harry/Ste fail even more than McHay did. Maybe they'll see fan reaction (i.e. the twitter people), and if there's enough uproar about John Paul and Ste in years to come then they'll just put them back together.
ME1234567
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by AnotherSarah:
“'Hints that they might get back together in the future.' ”

Ugh, No
AnotherSarah
17-05-2015
I hadn't seen this little chat with Kieron at the Baftas. The interviewer asks him at the end what he's got coming up apart from HO, and he says he likes to have fingers in different pies so there'll be stuff happening soon, he hopes.

We hope so too, Kieron.
Ready Steady Go
17-05-2015
Originally Posted by AnotherSarah:
“I hadn't seen this little chat with Kieron at the Baftas. The interviewer asks him at the end what he's got coming up apart from HO, and he says he likes to have fingers in different pies so there'll be stuff happening soon, he hopes.

We hope so too, Kieron.”

Thanks for sharing! The marriage talk is beyond adorable.

Oooh I hope this at least means that we could see him more in other things as well as Hollyoaks. We know he's being offered roles, like with Suspects, so it's probably just a matter of one of them being a Lime Pictures connected project. I was looking up that short film he did with with Ricky Tomlinson, and that was a Lime thing. It explains why BK let him do it
Nancy_Cottone
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by Celine3028:
“”

Well remember guys they said this right before Hollyoaks basiclly got it's but kicked
So the writers and execs make be thinking of a different direction, if they are smart, I mean JP and Ste were not even nominated for best on-screen partnership, that should say something
Nancy_Cottone
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by Ready Steady Go:
“Always the way

You poor thing.



I'm not that surprised - I think Hollyoaks will keep the opportunity there in case Harry/Ste fail even more than McHay did. Maybe they'll see fan reaction (i.e. the twitter people), and if there's enough uproar about John Paul and Ste in years to come then they'll just put them back together.”

Maybe not they said this right before Hollyoaks got there buts kicked So the writers and producers might want to think of a whole new direction if they are smart. And someone just told me that in a recent interview Kieron said Ste's next husband won't be JP or Harry so I don't know what that says

I mean JP and Ste were not even nominated for best on screen partnership that should say something right there
Nancy_Cottone
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by Ready Steady Go:
“Always the way

You poor thing.



I'm not that surprised - I think Hollyoaks will keep the opportunity there in case Harry/Ste fail even more than McHay did. Maybe they'll see fan reaction (i.e. the twitter people), and if there's enough uproar about John Paul and Ste in years to come then they'll just put them back together.”

Plus there's more Stendan fans on twitter then there ever were MCHay, and I don't see that changing, that should tell them something
lulu g
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by AnotherSarah:
“'Hints that they might get back together in the future.' ”

As I said in the main Hollyoaks thread, talk about flogging a dead horse! Better to give it a decent burial.

TPTB don't seem to have grasped that, although there's nothing the viewers like more than a will-they-won't-they storyline, it has to be about people they care about and that they really believe belong together.
Nancy_Cottone
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by lulu g:
“As I said in the main Hollyoaks thread, talk about flogging a dead horse! Better to give it a decent burial.

TPTB don't seem to have grasped that, although there's nothing the viewers like more than a will-they-won't-they storyline, it has to be about people they care about and that they really believe belong together.”

Exactly and Ste belongs with Brendan, but before anything they need to have Ste have more counseling about his fear about having sex
ME1234567
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by lulu g:
“As I said in the main Hollyoaks thread, talk about flogging a dead horse! Better to give it a decent burial.

TPTB don't seem to have grasped that, although there's nothing the viewers like more than a will-they-won't-they storyline, it has to be about people they care about and that they really believe belong together.”

Does anyone even care or want McFail back together? lol
ME1234567
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by Nancy_Cottone:
“Plus there's more Stendan fans on twitter then there ever were MCHay, and I don't see that changing, that should tell them something”

That because people Stendan wasn't forced down peoples throats unlike McFail
ME1234567
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by AnotherSarah:
“'Hints that they might get back together in the future.' ”

No just No
AnotherSarah
18-05-2015
Radio Times's online cast list for ep 4 of No Offence doesn't include Emmett. He's in it according to the IMDb cast list.

Woss going on?
mojo5000
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by AnotherSarah:
“Radio Times's online cast list for ep 4 of No Offence doesn't include Emmett. He's in it according to the IMDb cast list.

Woss going on?”

I wondered that! Maybe the episode is wrong on IMDb.

In AD news he's in it a fair bit again this week. Next week he meets Jesus by the look of it
AnotherSarah
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by mojo5000:
“I wondered that! Maybe the episode is wrong on IMDb.

In AD news he's in it a fair bit again this week. Next week he meets Jesus by the look of it ”



Yes, poor Saul's started hallucinating.
ardluck
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by Ready Steady Go:
“I just braved an interview with James and Kieron at the BSAs. Luckily there's absolutely nothing shippy. I should have known

Kieron's beautiful. I want Brendan to stroke the stubble and run his tongue over the Bambi lashes ”

Haha I've looked at this again and at one point when Kieron is talking James does appear uninterested and he gets distracted by what's around him.


Afternoon.
ardluck
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by mojo5000:
“I wondered that! Maybe the episode is wrong on IMDb.

In AD news he's in it a fair bit again this week. Next week he meets Jesus by the look of it ”

Yay!!! Exciting.

Can you please help me view it again this week mojo?
mojo5000
18-05-2015
Originally Posted by ardluck:
“Yay!!! Exciting.

Can you please help me view it again this week mojo?”

Of course!
<<
<
10 of 485
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map