|
||||||||
Mick stealing Stans money EE |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
|
Mick stealing Stans money EE
Who the hell does he think he is???? Why the hell did Lee think he had ANY entitlement to it either???
Shirley and Tina are Stan's legal next of kin how dare he steal their inheritance, that man has no bloody shame!!!!!! Even worse that he is using Shirleys inheritance to buy her out of the Vic, shameless. Poor Shirley |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
Who the hell does he think he is???? Why the hell did Lee think he had ANY entitlement to it either???
Shirley and Tina are Stan's legal next of kin how dare he steal their inheritance, that man has no bloody shame!!!!!! Even worse that he is using Shirleys inheritance to buy her out of the Vic, shameless. Poor Shirley Actually no just realised he didn't divorce did he? Then Sylvie is actually his legal next of kin. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22,735
|
There's some justice I suppose as Shirley is using the money she got from Stan which she never paid back to extort more money from Mick
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
There's some justice I suppose as Shirley is using the money she got from Stan which she never paid back to extort more money from Mick
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
The least he should have done was to share it with Sylvie, Tina and Shirley. In fact Tina should have got the lion's share as she'd always been there for Stan. It was theft, pure and simple.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22,735
|
Quote:
The least he should have done was to share it with Sylvie, Tina and Shirley. In fact Tina should have got the lion's share as she'd always been there for Stan. It was theft, pure and simple.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
Quote:
They'd have to take off the £10k Shirley got off Stan though as that was just a loan and he wanted it back. So the estate was worth £5k and the estate was owed £10k
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Doesn't matter what she did or did not pay. She didn't pay Mick or Linda that money.
Nor does she have any more entitlement then Mick or Tina all are legally listed his children. But none of them are his legal next of kin. So this is all irrelevant considering he was married and thus it is his wife. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 1,142
|
Quote:
Who the hell does he think he is???? Why the hell did Lee think he had ANY entitlement to it either???
Shirley and Tina are Stan's legal next of kin how dare he steal their inheritance, that man has no bloody shame!!!!!! Even worse that he is using Shirleys inheritance to buy her out of the Vic, shameless. Poor Shirley |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22,735
|
Quote:
Shirley paid Stan back with money she borrowed from Phil. When Dean found out he then helped pay Phil back.
![]() ETA Off topic but why on earth does Phil keep giving Shirley money ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
Oh so there is another £10k at least which Sylvie should be getting as next of kin. I won't hold my breath
![]() ETA Off topic but why on earth does Phil keep giving Shirley money ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
Quote:
Oh so there is another £10k at least which Sylvie should be getting as next of kin. I won't hold my breath
![]() ETA Off topic but why on earth does Phil keep giving Shirley money ![]() ![]() Anyway we're going off topic...what do you think of Mick helping himself to money that wasn't his ? |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
|
Quote:
Shirley took shares she paid nothing into worth far more than 5K, so no sympathy from me. Tina however you may have a point. And legally they are all his next of kin as he is the listed father on all of their birth certificates.
Actually no just realised he didn't divorce did he? Then Sylvie is actually his legal next of kin. The money to repair the Vic came from money Stan gave Shirley, making it technically hers, which led to her becoming a shareholder. Stan must have legally divorced Sylvie as he was about to marry Cora, making Shirley and Tina Stan's legal next of kin. Mick is a thief |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22,735
|
Quote:
We have a bank of Phil joke. He gave money to Roxy, Ronnie, and Charlie this year. Bought Abi a car. He is using his resources for Dot. He is like an ATM. Wish he lived near me.
![]() Quote:
If she'd gone ahead with the wedding she'd have been entitled to half of everything when she left him...they were together for years. A few thousand's not much compensation for what he and his son put her through.
Anyway we're going off topic...what do you think of Mick helping himself to money that wasn't his ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
Micks birth certificate details have NEVER been explained, do the viewers actually know who is on Micks birth certificate?
The money to repair the Vic came from money Stan gave Shirley, making it technically hers, which led to her becoming a shareholder. Stan must have legally divorced Sylvie as he was about to marry Cora, making Shirley and Tina Stan's legal next of kin. Mick is a thief |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 414
|
he shudda hired a assasin to kill Shirley, dean n Buster, then turn the gun on himself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
Quote:
Yes I'm starting to see his attraction to the ladies now
![]() I wont rest until it's returned to the rightful recipient, Sylvie ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
And we do know what's on his birth certificate. He was married to Mick's legal mother (which is not Shirley). At 39 he would have seen his birth certificate, Shirley is not on it. His grandmother and her husband are. Which by the way was her husband at the time of death he admitted it to Cora.
When your married your husband goes on the birth certificate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
|
Quote:
If she'd gone ahead with the wedding she'd have been entitled to half of everything when she left him...they were together for years. A few thousand's not much compensation for what he and his son put her through.
Anyway we're going off topic...what do you think of Mick helping himself to money that wasn't his ? Shirley also knows a lot of Phils dirty dealings, enough to probably put him behind bars. Phil is wise to keep her sweet. or Maybe its just because Shirley is Phil's one true love ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQMPtbuls58
at 14:04 babe tells her Cora pretends she knew. With at 16:58 they talk about him dying a bigamist. Just as well they didn't complete their vows! So his wife was his next of kin and is entitled to the money. Of course had he legally married Cora it would have been her but he didn't. So not poor Shirley or Tina. Poor Sylvie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South West England
Posts: 4,636
|
Phil gave Shirley money because she blackmailed him. Gotta love Shirley Carter's style
![]() Mick should have shared it with Sylvie, Shirley and Tina. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
Regardless of how Shirley came to have shares in the Vic, that money was Stan's and should have been shared equally between Sylvie, Mick, Shirley and Tina. Mick shouldn't have taken it as his own. If Shirley or Tina had taken that money and not informed the others or shared it, they would be called out for it on here.
Edit: 'Re Phil, he deserves all he gets really, after everything Shirley did for him and everything he put her through, Shirley is the only person who can blackmail Phil and get away with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
|
Quote:
Regardless of how Shirley came to have shares in the Vic, that money was Stan's and should have been shared equally between Mick, Shirley and Tina. Mick shouldn't have taken it as his own. If Shirley or Tina had taken that money and not informed the others or shared it, they would be called out for it on here.
I don't care about him paying Shirley as she shouldn't be paid in the first place she paid no money in she shouldn't get any out. Tina is a bit different she has been scammed. It belongs to his wife some reason we are all skimming over that. The 3 might be able to contest they had half to share between them but that's the most they would get 2.5k between them. His wife would get at least that if not the entire amount. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 9,495
|
Quote:
Oh I am defiantly calling Mick out. He has no more rights to it then his 2 other legal children.
I don't care about him paying Shirley as she shouldn't be paid in the first place she paid no money in she shouldn't get any out. Tina is a bit different she has been scammed. It belongs to his wife some reason we are all skimming over that. The 3 might be able to contest they had half to share between them but that's the most they would get 2.5k between them. His wife would get at least that if not the entire amount.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22,735
|
Quote:
I'd have like to have seen it split between Sylvie and Tina.
![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:02.






