|
||||||||
Quality of acts better on BGMT? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 555
|
Quality of acts better on BGMT?
Does anyone else feel that the acts shown on BGMT are of better quality and funnier in general than the main show? I felt this last week and also this week. I don't understand why the producers would want to show better acts on the spinoff show than on the main show which the majority of people see. I also find Stephen Mulhern a better presenter than Ant and Dec and is great at interacting with the contestants. Sorry if no one else feels the same!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,058
|
are u on drugs there far worse and tricky
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
The dancing dog should have been on the main show. How do you write to the editor to complain about his stupid decisions?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,075
|
Think it is all in the editing. Was it last year or the year before there were two pole dancers (but more like gymnasts) that easily deserved to be in the semis. Got 4 yeses but weren't put further. Think that is why they were on BGMT rather than the main show.
They still got robbed in my opinion. That is just one that stands out for me oh and this.. didn't make the semis really, seriously? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgJ1HX1ejQ4 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.


