I am baffled as to why they picked Chloe.

How did she stand out compared to other people who wanted to get in?

I suspect it would have been possible to find a better HM by picking someone at random off the street.

besides her norks nothing & that voice

To piss you off.

She's not even impressive from that POV.


Then they've failed.

I'd like some serious suggestions, please.

Perhaps they were short on time and figured what the hell, she'll probably be first out

Perhaps they interviewed her for more than 2 minutes, and saw some potential in her that a 2 minute VT can't demonstrate?

They did pick 15 others at random off the street.

she appeals to the chavvy/geordie shore loving type audience section?

Within a few days she will be getting paralytic drunk,telling everyone how much she loves chips and pies,and pissing her pants...............because this is how "real" women behave.

I agree. Maybe she is fodder for the first eviction.

She seems very aggressive and volatile. They want arguments.

It's not just the VT; and it pretty much never turns out that a HM has some huge potential that's actually realised during BB and that is also so far from being evident on launch night.

What "potential" do you think she might have?

Even Harriet makes much more sense as a HM choice than Chloe.

Michelle Visage was bigging up Chloe on BOTS, for some reason.

Seems very am-dram, as though she's trying to embody previous housemates. Right down to the only liking genuine people. Even though she doesn't come across as genuine to me.

She also says that she doesn't like posh people. So what happens if she meets a posh person who happens to be genuine? Has she thought about that?