|
||||||||
The best phone for signal strength? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
The best phone for signal strength?
I've had a Galaxy S6 for a month now, loving the phone but I'm really disappointed by the signal strength compared to my Galaxy S4. There's between 5-10dBm difference and it's enough to see a usable 4G signal turn into a slow 3G signal.
I'm on Three and there are plenty of spots where the 4G is poor, my house included. The S4 can hang onto 4G just fine but the S6 in the same spots has a worse signal (in terms of dBm) and it also seems to drop to 3G more aggressively rather than holding onto 4G. So worse signal and drops to 3G quicker, bad combo. I've seen a marginal improvement in the phone holding onto 4G after some OTA updates but still the signal is worse than my S4. As much as I like the phone, I'm not going to keep it if the radio can't compete with my 2 year old S4. So I'm looking for suggestions for a new smartphone with a great radio. Maybe a Note 4, maybe an iPhone 6? Which smartphones do you find have the best signal? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,683
|
All I can say is ever since not using the old Nokias (6110 etc), signal has never been as good. iPhone 3Gs / 5 pretty crappy really.
Then I got my iPhone 6 and right away noticed a difference. Also family members and friends who subsequently got the 6, it was the first thing they mentioned so I wasn't just imagining it. I still don't think it's quite as good as an old mobile with external antenna but it's damn close! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,294
|
I always think that the Motorola line up has good reception. The current Moto X has an external antenna.
If not I agree with Devon that the antenna on the 6 is pretty good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 456
|
Quote:
All I can say is ever since not using the old Nokias (6110 etc), signal has never been as good. iPhone 3Gs / 5 pretty crappy really.
Then I got my iPhone 6 and right away noticed a difference. Also family members and friends who subsequently got the 6, it was the first thing they mentioned so I wasn't just imagining it. I still don't think it's quite as good as an old mobile with external antenna but it's damn close! The option for an external antenna would appeal to me as well, but I can't see Apple, or Samsung, spoiling their nice sleek devices with an ugly socket, somehow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Woore, Cheshire/Shropshire
Posts: 1,672
|
I can confirm that later models of Samsung (I presently have the note 3) after the S4 have noticeably weaker signal levels then before and loose true network much easier then before, the note 4 has better GPS then the note 3 but no reports on any improvement in reception levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 369
|
Plastic phones seem to do better than the glass clad aluminium type for signal. which might be why you were doing better with your Galaxy s4 than you are with your S6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
I always think that the Motorola line up has good reception. The current Moto X has an external antenna.
If not I agree with Devon that the antenna on the 6 is pretty good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 621
|
Living in rural Suffolk a decent phone signal for me is a must. I have found both the Backberry Z30 and Passport to hold on to a signal far better then anything else. Then comes the Moto X and Nexus 6 and IPhone 6 (+). They all seem to be about the same. The HTC M9 is almost as good for signal reception. And the worst by a long way the S6. Yes I have used all the above phones. Where I work at the 6+ manages to get 1-2 bars of 4G. So does the Motos. The S6 just stays on H+.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 301
|
Just to add that I had an S4, and needed inTouch in my house as I had no service..
switched to a Sony Z2, 2/3 bars consistently (all 3G), no need for intouch at all!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 499
|
every handset is different even two the same make i had a lemon Z2 which was weaker than my previous Z so i took it back and swapped it for a another one which was noticeably better but still not quite up to the Z
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,875
|
Samsung phones, especially the Note 3, have terrible reception, in my experience.
I have the Moto X (2013) and I find that to be slightly above average, better than the iPhone 5S but not as good as the iPhone 4S which I think is the best phone I have ever owned, signal-wise. The iPhone 6 isn't too bad either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 41
|
Motorola phones have always been fairly good for me. Mrs has an iPhone 5 and previous to that a 4 and they seem to fairly good at hanging onto a signal. I've had a first gen Moto X and now have the 2nd gen and think the the latter is slightly better. I'm in rural N Yorkshire on Vodafone 4G and some days my phone reports up to 50% of the day without signal? Find it very strange as I never catch the Moto X without a signal and only the very occasional call goes straight to answerphone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,257
|
Quote:
All I can say is ever since not using the old Nokias (6110 etc), signal has never been as good. iPhone 3Gs / 5 pretty crappy really.
Then I got my iPhone 6 and right away noticed a difference. Also family members and friends who subsequently got the 6, it was the first thing they mentioned so I wasn't just imagining it. I still don't think it's quite as good as an old mobile with external antenna but it's damn close! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 58
|
So, I have done a fair bit of research into this.
The better brands for signal: Motorola Blackberry Some Nokia devices Sony The average signal oem Apple Htc Weak signal devices Samsung Lg |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,985
|
Quote:
So, I have done a fair bit of research into this.
The better brands for signal: Motorola Blackberry Some Nokia devices Sony The average signal oem Apple Htc Weak signal devices Samsung Lg |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
The iPhone 6 (as was the 4s from memory) is far better than any recent Motorola device I've tried (original E, original G, original 4G, new G, new 4G and X), so your list is a little inaccurate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,985
|
Quote:
Just my experience, including the 4s and 6. I am not going to get into an argument with you. It is just my own personal experience, living in a weak signal area and testing a large number of devices.
Probably better to be clearer to avoid misunderstanding .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,875
|
The 4S had fantastic signal. The 5S was worse and the 6 was better than the 5S, in my experience anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
|
Appreciate all the input guys! So out of the devices mentioned, my favourites are the iPhone 6, Moto X (2014) & the Nexus 6.
Has anyone had any experience with the Note 4 signal compared to other devices? I'd like to rule it out if it's as bad as other Samsung devices. So far, I'm leaning towards the iPhone 6. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 621
|
The Note 4 is slightly better then the S6. But not by a lot. When I compared them at various locations the Note 4 was about 1db better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,918
|
Quote:
Oh, sorry, I misunderstood your post, I thought you meant you had done research into the matter (as opposed to it just being your personal experience and an opinion).
Probably better to be clearer to avoid misunderstanding .What absolutely pisses me off is when someone says “I have done my research and I know which TV (or whatever) I am going to buy”. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
Samsung phones, especially the Note 3, have terrible reception, in my experience.
I have the Moto X (2013) and I find that to be slightly above average, better than the iPhone 5S but not as good as the iPhone 4S which I think is the best phone I have ever owned, signal-wise. The iPhone 6 isn't too bad either. I'm intrigued as to how people are backing up some of these claims, as the phones themselves don't give accurate readings of signal strength .... |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
It really bothers me when the term research is misused. Research in this case could have been as simple as having a number of devices at the same location at the same time. The same location at different times (separated by weeks/months/years) is an invalid test as far as real conclusions go. But at least d123 was talking about a personal experience.
What absolutely pisses me off is when someone says “I have done my research and I know which TV (or whatever) I am going to buy”. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,875
|
Quote:
If the 4S is the best you've owned signal wise, you must have had some pretty bad phones. I like my 4S, but signal strength is not something that they're renowned for.
Moto X 2013, 2014 Moto G First Gen Moto E First, Second Gen iPhone 3G, 4, 4S, 5S, 6 Samsung Galaxy Note 3, 4 Samsung Galaxy S2, S4 OnePlus One HTC One M7, M8, M9 Nokia Lumia 830 HTC Incredible S, Desire HD Sony Xperia Z1, Z2, Z3 Those are what I remember off the top of my head. The iPhone 4S was the best out of those, as far as I remember. The Note 3 was particularly bad, as I have mentioned: I got rid of it for that reason. I remember the iPhone 4S being quite renowned for its ability to latch onto signal, it was recommended by an Australian carrier because it was so good in weak signal areas. Apple probably did quite a lot of testing to get it really good after the iPhone 4's antenna issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,985
|
Quote:
You clearly do not understand the definition of research then. Look it up.
Quote:
Research: (noun) the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions. I'll bite, just using a handset and then having an opinion does not constitute "research" it just shows a personal experience. "the group carries out research in geochemistry" Research would indicate a systematic approach, say using 10 of the same handsets, from the same location at the same time and comparing the average results against multiples of tens of the other handsets being tested at the same time and place. When you said you "did a fair amount of research", I doubt you did that, did you? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:53.



.