• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Cult, Sci-Fi & Fantasy
Humans - Channel 4
<<
<
41 of 92
>>
>
Danger Close
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Prince Monalulu:
“I don't get the impression the Coppers Wife is 'having fun' with her synth or that he's 'helping' her, nothing worthy of quotes.
It's a useful machine that's helping her recovery and she doesn't find it objectionable as her husband finds synths.



Synth detective has been mentioned more than once, read some of the thread at least.
Last page or two would do so you can keep up with the discussion.

I don't think Mattie's done a complete U-turn, lots of people find sex with inanimate objects odd, blow up dolls for example.
I think her objections were spelled out, Sex with and de-activated synth, clearly had some parallels with drug rape.

Oddly enough many of us were also teenage boys at one time and see reasons why he wouldn't have copped off with the Girl at the party.”

Yes, mentioned but only in so much as people being surprised she turned out to be synth.

Mattie sees synths as nothing more than machines and demonstrated her anger at them and lack of caring when shooting Odi and trying to shoot Anita. Yet when it came to the party scene she suddenly went all protective and, normal.

The reason the boy gave was that there was someone else. Which we, the viewer, know to be Anita.


And, a bit less... aggression in your posts in future.
olivej
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Doctor_Wibble:
“I've clearly missed something critical here - why is it that Jill H-p is getting so many specific mentions? Not a criticism of those who have but I genuinely don't know, do I lose street-cred for that?”

she is a fairly well known actress and has been around for quite a long time, she was a teenager in a kids tv show called Byker Grove, she then starred as Phil Mitchells wife in Eastenders, she was a celeb on Strictly Come Dancing, I believe she then went onto the West End stage for a while too, after Strictly

Im sure she has done loads more tv work too but I cant think of what else she has been in - sorry
striing
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by dodrade:
“How come Anita/Mia has been running for 14 years when Odi is pretty much ready for scrap after just six?”

I didn't understand this either - but maybe Odi isn't only 6 years old. Maybe it's just that the paperwork George has says he's owned him for 6 years but really he was around much longer?

Originally Posted by Danger Close:
“Yes, mentioned but only in so much as people being surprised she turned out to be synth.”

Eh what are you talking about? She was robotty from the minute she looked up in the car and loads of the thread has been spent discussing whether she is a synth or just a crap actress. We didn't necessarily know if she was actually going to be revealed to be a synth and no one got the bag down the gullet bit. They got us good and proper with that one.
koantemplation
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“I
Eh what are you talking about? She was robotty from the minute she looked up in the car and loads of the thread has been spent discussing whether she is a synth or just a crap actress. We didn't necessarily know if she was actually going to be revealed to be a synth and no one got the bag down the gullet bit. They got us good and proper with that one.”

Eh? Most people got the bag down the gullet bit. It was only a few who didn't.

I'm still not sure if they made her 'robotty' to suggest she was a synth without giving the game away or if it was just bad acting. The hair style didn't help.
Danger Close
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“I didn't understand this either - but maybe Odi isn't only 6 years old. Maybe it's just that the paperwork George has says he's owned him for 6 years but really he was around much longer?


Eh what are you talking about? She was robotty from the minute she looked up in the car and loads of the thread has been spent discussing whether she is a synth or just a crap actress. We didn't necessarily know if she was actually going to be revealed to be a synth and no one got the bag down the gullet bit. They got us good and proper with that one.”

I did see mention of it by yourself and one or two others after last weeks episode. But that's the first I saw. Can't be arsed trawling the thread so I will concede this point.
striing
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by koantemplation:
“Eh? Most people got the bag down the gullet bit. It was only a few who didn't.”

Oh okay I didn't read anyone saying that she's going to be proved to be a synth by having a bag down her throat but it's entirely possible I haven't read all the posts. I thought it was a nice touch as the obvious things would have been to show her on a charging point or taking out brown contacts to reveal synth eyes but I guess is wasn't such a nice touch if people had worked it out in advance!
koantemplation
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“Oh okay I didn't read anyone saying that she's going to be proved to be a synth by having a bag down her throat but it's entirely possible I haven't read all the posts. I thought it was a nice touch as the obvious things would have been to show her on a charging point or taking out brown contacts to reveal synth eyes but I guess is wasn't such a nice touch if people had worked it out in advance!”

Oh I meant after she did it in the show. Most people might not have got that bit before hand.

Although anyone who saw A.I. would know that most robots can't eat unless they are designed to eat.

Personally I think a condom would be a bit risky. If it burst as she pulled it out, she could be harmed just as if she had drank the wine without the condom.
striing
07-07-2015
I meant before. We were talking about what people did or did not work out before the reveal (ie many had thought she might well be a synth).

I had wondered why blonde synth was ordering a drink and what she was gonig to do with it because I realised she couldn't drink but I hadn't even noticed whether police synth was eating and drinking or not.
Moleskin
07-07-2015
Has anyone wondered why they've made the androids so human and able to pose as humans using contact lenses and not like C3-PO or the ones in I, Robot where it would be obvious what they were?
koantemplation
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“I meant before. We were talking about what people did or did not work out before the reveal (ie many had thought she might well be a synth).
.”

I have to wonder how many of them had seen the Swedish version before hand.

I saw it after the talk of her being a synth but could see why people might believe she was one even without seeing the original show.
Prince Monalulu
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“I have been wondering if the more human synths, have minds based on human brianwaves, the rest do not, as for why she is working order, I dont know synths seem pretty sturdy to me, and can be easily repaired, if one lives a quiet life, does not get involved in car chases and the like, they should live a long time. I suspect more are replaed for a newer model, than because they stop working.

Also makes you wonder if like smart phones, is there a strong second hand market for synths? I dont see why not, can they be taken to CeX, or can they be traded in off the price of a new one like a car, and then a dealer gives them a tune up and sell them second hand, whilst the fact Antia was bought "new" from a store, seems to suggest no, im surprise that, this is not the case.”

We don't know anything much about the life expectancy of a synth nor how they're made.
There could be a selection of different brands/models all with differing problems, product recalls, etc like cars.
Odi could have come with a partworks Magazine for hobbiest Synth builders, build your own synth in 100 editions, full of cheap wiring and rarely completed
Anita/Mia could have been akin to manufacturers in house testbed, rarely used, no expense spared, constantly been fettled and upgraded, expensive gold connectors in her wiring, etc, etc.
Anita can't be used an example for the existence or non-existence of a S/hand market, as she's not standard in anyway.
Charnham
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Prince Monalulu:
“We don't know anything much about the life expectancy of a synth nor how they're made.
There could be a selection of different brands/models all with differing problems, product recalls, etc like cars.
Odi could have come with a partworks Magazine for hobbiest Synth builders, build your own synth in 100 editions, full of cheap wiring and rarely completed
Anita/Mia could have been akin to manufacturers in house testbed, rarely used, no expense spared, constantly been fettled and upgraded, expensive gold connectors in her wiring, etc, etc.
Anita can't be used an example for the existence or non-existence of a S/hand market, as she's not standard in anyway.”

agreed that Antia should not be used an example, but you have a point, had not thought about people out dating and upgrading their own synths, I guess I figured it something a little too complex for the majority.

lol at a Build your own synth in 100 issues.
Prince Monalulu
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Moleskin:
“Has anyone wondered why they've made the androids so human and able to pose as humans using contact lenses and not like C3-PO or the ones in I, Robot where it would be obvious what they were?”

Errm because the drama wouldn't work if they looked like assembly line robots.
That's the whole point, they've got to blur the lines.
See Hiroshi Ishiguro Laboratories
I think there's footage of James May in the lab with his robot somewhere, it's a bit ooky IMO.

I suspect that if a manufacturer could make robots to this level of 'realness' there would be legislation to stop them, to prevent some people getting overly attached to them.
Prince Monalulu
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“agreed that Antia should not be used an example, but you have a point, had not thought about people out dating and upgrading their own synths, I guess I figured it something a little too complex for the majority.

lol at a Build your own synth in 100 issues.”

Well we've got code hackers and online code exchanges, could be whole synth scenes out there.
Various synth competitions, robot wars, synth olympics, etc whole new outlets for hobbiests.

On that tip, there was that cack movie about robots boxing, blokey who played Wolverine.
Charnham
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Prince Monalulu:
“Well we've got code hackers and online code exchanges, could be whole synth scenes out there.
Various synth competitions, robot wars, synth olympics, etc whole new outlets for hobbiests.”

I get the coding thing, its more the physical mechanical hacking I would be surprised by
Prince Monalulu
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by koantemplation:
“Oh I meant after she did it in the show. Most people might not have got that bit before hand.

Although anyone who saw A.I. would know that most robots can't eat unless they are designed to eat.

Personally I think a condom would be a bit risky. If it burst as she pulled it out, she could be harmed just as if she had drank the wine without the condom.”

I'd say it's a safe bet that synth copper was manufactured or modified to accommodate the condom, that's a lot of redundant space inside a synth otherwise.
Prince Monalulu
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“I get the coding thing, its more the physical mechanical hacking I would be surprised by”

At £20K new and synths been so common, no reason why there wouldn't be a modifying scene.
Synths all dressed up like a F1 driver with the names of the upgraded parts manufacturers on them
myss
07-07-2015
Although i'm still trying to warm with the series, the latest installment was not a bad episode, it certainly opened up the story more than in previous ones. I more intrigued with Leo and the back story there than with Anita and that family - I think they all annoy me now, even the little 'un.

Originally Posted by Paul237:
“The Niska scenes are getting increasingly far fetched. As if a whole room of humans couldn't take down a synth. We saw there were plenty of weapons there - you'd just crack her over the head from behind while she was swinging her bat at someone.

Otherwise, it was good as usual. ”

I get that she might be stronger than the average man but to take on all of them in that room? Yeah that one was a bit hard to believe.
Prince Monalulu
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by myss:
“Although i'm still trying to warm with the series, the latest installment was not a bad episode, it certainly opened up the story more than in previous ones. I more intrigued with Leo and the back story there than with Anita and that family - I think they all annoy me now, even the little 'un.

I get that she might be stronger than the average man but to take on all of them in that room? Yeah that one was a bit hard to believe.”

They didn't know she was a synth, just some random woman going garrity, they didn't take her on, they ran around in a panic mostly.
It's the sort of thing that happens, if one person had picked up a weapon and had a good go at her others probably would have followed, human nature.
Tishtoshtess
07-07-2015
So I've had a read through and this thread has helped me piece together a few blanks I've had. But...have we touched on where the synths are coming from?

Spoiler
I have an inkling they're dead humans, being used as a vessel for the robotics.
striing
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by koantemplation:
“I have to wonder how many of them had seen the Swedish version before hand.

I saw it after the talk of her being a synth but could see why people might believe she was one even without seeing the original show.”

How would anyone see the Swedish one? It hasn't been on and there's no DVD. Anyway apparently the two shows aren't even the same so even if someone has seen the Swedish one it wouldn't tell them anything about this one.

She just looked like a synth right from the off - people were commenting on it even during the episode - so it was a fair line of thought that she might be one, though as I said we reserved judgement for the alternative possibility that she was just a crap actress.

Also, have you seen all the other guesses at things we've come up with? I've still got my clone idea based on nothing more than the fact that I think a synth at the very start looks like Jill Halfpenny! Just because one of the theories turned out to be true doesn't mean they all will. Having a stab a what's going on is part of the fun of watching stuff like this no?
koantemplation
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by striing:
“How would anyone see the Swedish one? It hasn't been on and there's no DVD. Anyway apparently the two shows aren't even the same so even if someone has seen the Swedish one it wouldn't tell them anything about this one. ”

A lot of people saw it when it was first shown and I've seen it recently (don't ask how).

There are DVDs and even a two season Blu-ray out, but very expensive.
Natarhi
07-07-2015
Originally Posted by Doctor_Wibble:
“In the same way that people having crushes on favourite band members don't just stop having other relationships, but on the other hand maybe it was an on-the-spot panic reaction as opposed to any particularly deliberate chain of thought about not being judged.”

Yes maybe.

Originally Posted by SepangBlue:
“We know that smash clubs were legal because we saw Hobb's colleague intercept a call to the police about a synth going rogue in one. If they were illegal would the humans there have called the law when things went p-shaped?”

I think they would if the going p-shaped was a random woman kicking off and attacking everybody. However I see no reason for them to be illegal in and of themselves (although I'd assume that some may be getting their synths via dodgy routes, which might be illegal).

Originally Posted by Thrombin:
“I think Niska is just as deluded as any human who anthropomorphises the synths. She may be sentiient but the others are no more worthy of consideration for their feelings than an outdated PC or mobile phone. .She'll be attacking humans for mistreatment to automobiles, next ”

Yes when she went to the back room and told them they were free I was wondering what she was thinking. Could be that she is deluded about how much a normal synth can think or feel, or it could be that she actually has very little experience of normal synths to know their capabilities. After all she may well have been kept hidden with only the other advanced synths and Leo for nearly all of her life.

Originally Posted by Danger Close:
“Mattie doing a complete u-turn wasn't in keeping with the way she's been set up so far.”

I don't know that it's a complete u-turn. She was attacking the synths in the first episode, but I think having Anita around has changed her attitude. Also she was shooting the synths basically because she was angry with them, she felt that they were making her talents meaningless. So I don't think it's a big step between being angry that the synths are smarter than you and being angry that boys in your peer group would rather have sex with a synth than talk to real girls at the party.
L.B.
08-07-2015
I'm curious about David Elster. Have we actually seen him in an earlier episode (and I missed it) or is he a character that's only, so far, been referred to?
Natarhi
08-07-2015
Originally Posted by L.B.:
“I'm curious about David Elster. Have we actually seen him in an earlier episode (and I missed it) or is he a character that's only, so far, been referred to?”

As far as I know he's only been referred to. I think he's supposed to be dead (not that we couldn't see him in flashbacks, and with a show like this it could turn out that everyone thinks he's dead but really he's in hiding or something).
<<
<
41 of 92
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map