Originally Posted by Salv*:
“The thing is for me... balance.
I don't support someone too confrontational (Helen, Hopkins) or too dull (Sam), I like to find people in the middle. For example, my Top 5 ever are Aisleyne, Aaron, Victor, Helen BB2 and Alex S. All different types, Gina is in my Top 10, but then so is quieter HMs like Rachel. And Helen wasn't just confrontational, she was too nasty to support. So it's not based only on confrontational/dull, but if they are likeable. People who argue a lot can be likeable too.
I didn't mind Pricey winning.”
I liked Helen, the only people she argued with was Danielle who called her a slag and Matthew who looked down his nose at her. Gina on the other hand was my idea of a nasty piece of work, her pure hatred of Hazel and constantly trying to discredit her, as far as I am concerned Hazel did nothing wrong, it was Daley's responsibility to stay faithful not Hazel's, the way Gina constantly went on at her it's no wonder Hazel snapped at her. It was worth voting for Sam to win just to stop Lady Muck getting the winning title. Also, can't stand Aisleyne, something about a grown woman who speaks well trying to be 'down with the kids, innit' by speaking like a teenage wannabe rapper is kinda sad.
Although I liked Rachel and was happy to see her win, she wasn't entertaining though, but it was either her or that blind man, and he was horrible.