Originally Posted by Mulett:
“I am in no way a fan of Moffat. The 'Matt Smith' years remain, for me, a barren time of poor story telling and little character.
And I think Moffat continues to make poor decisions, such as keeping Clara on as companion when her story has well and truly been told already.
I also worry about his time commitment to the show. We've had years of on-off production and no spin-off shows. The Doctor Who franchise shrunk significantly under Moffat and I think that's an enormous shame.
But I did notice an improvement with Season 8, which I think had a lot to do with Brian Minchin being back on board. The story telling improved and although there were a few wrong-turns (the Clara/Danny story didn't work) I think overall I enjoyed Capaldi's first season more than any of Matt Smith's
So whilst I continue to have concerns about Moffat being in charge, the show did feel a little more on track last year so I guess I'm open minded.”
Completely agree with everything you have said here. Series 8 was an improvement, but it feels like there still yet to be a series which as a whole matched any of the RTD one's. It's as though the show was left by someone who knew exactly how to competently write a story arc and make a series work as a whole, and given to a person who has been trying to experiment on how to do it as well ever since (evident by all the format changes) and hasn't quite gotten there yet. But yes, series 8 was an improvement on that front, and like you I stay open minded because basically, what else can you do? Having the show is better than no show at all, and we still get some good individual episodes, but I would like to think that in the future that it could hit, what I personally perceive to be the quality highs of the RTD era.
Also before anyone says it, I'm not trying to bash Moffat exactly, I'm saying I want him to produce quality, I want to be able to praise his latest series and how it perfectly worked as a whole, but unfortunately that oppourtunity hasn't arisen for me yet.
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“It really wasn't.
I sent two emails to LEGO when RTD was in charge suggesting they make LEGO Doctor Who sets and both times I got the reply that it wasn't global enough. LEGO know more than any of us what is and isn't a worldwide success.”
You can't honestly believe that lego is the ultimate marker of a succesful show. If that is the case I suppose you'll have to go and tell all the many shows around the world that think they are successful because of there good ratings, critical praise, and dvd sales that actually, if there hasn't been a lego set made of their show then they are wrong and will actually be facing immenent cancellation soon.
Originally Posted by Mulett:
“I don't think I'm ever going to agree with some of the views on this forum/in this thread about when New Who became internationally successful.
Classic Doctor Who wasn't originally a niche show. I think it became so in its later years, but in the 60s, 70s and early 80s it was prime time family viewing. And those viewing patterns were replicated around the world - it was a family show, not a niche sci-fi fan favourite.
The show's current popularity continues to grow around the world, but RTD did more than just lay the foundations for that. He left a show in 2010 that was already an international hit. And I personally think it sad that so many fans on here refuse to acknowledge that early success.
All that's happened since then is a continuation of that upward trend. Some of the countries where the show is now broadcast haven't even reached the Matt Smith episodes yet but we would still be expected to count that success as Moffat's.
I also think there is some confusion as to the role RTD/Moffat play in this. They produce a popular product and one that can be sold profitably around the world. But they certainly don't play a role in where/how it is sold or how it is marketed.”
Again I agree with you. RTD created a successful revival of the show which at that time never seemed to be out of the papers and often seemed to be in general conversation. Then, when thanks to those initial years it was already solidified as a success and sure to return year on year, the bbc then began more and more marketing it worldwide.
There has been no magical jump in quality since 2010.I personally think there has been the opposite, but If I was trying to look objectively without my personal feelings involved, I would say that the quality has roughly stayed the same since 2005 to now
What I absolutely believe though, is that those first few years were crucial. Think how Rose was so perfectly balanced. It invited in new audience members such as myself whilst being completely respectful to established fans. As such I feel that RTD's contribution is the reason the show is still on air today, and that had Moffat been the show runner from the start, and series 5 had been series 1, I doubt the show would have ever made it this far.