Originally Posted by Boz_Lowdownl:
“I think you are forgetting / conveniently ignoring the 1979 ITV strike. The rest of your post is pure fantasy / re writing of history. After The Robots of Death and The Talons of Weng Chiang were fans wishing for Hinchcliife's departure? Of course not!”
Not fantasy at all - if you were involved in organised fandom back then you'd know that the fans were not completely united behind Hinchcliffe at all. Williams wasn't seen as necessarily
better than Hinchliffe but a great many fans were massive supporters of the direction in which Williams initially took the show. What
is re-writing history is the commonly held view these days that the Williams era was considered poor. Not in 1977 / 78 it wasn't. It might not be well regarded today, but that certainly wasn't the case at the time.
I personally didn't like what Williams did with the show, but my views back then were somewhat out of step with the views of many other fans at the time.
My point, however, is not so much the Hinchliffe / Williams divide but that whoever is the incumbent producer always, almost without fail, gets a lot of stick from the fans and the fans always, almost without fail, pin their hopes on whoever might be next. Then the next producer is feted for a while before he somehow becomes a figure of hate amongst those who profess to love Doctor Who. It's always been this way. And always will be I'm sure.
I would imagine that this, more than almost anything else, is why it's so hard to find a replacement for Moffat. I quite agree that plenty of talented people would love to run Doctor Who, and I'm sure there is probably a number of people who are actually very capable of running a complex, demanding and unique show like Doctor Who. But it's the extraneous demands on such a showrunner - the sheer amount of hatred and insults and derision that such a showrunner is subjected too - which is what puts off most sane people from taking the job.