|
||||||||
Making Nick nominate first is really crappy |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 15,052
|
Making Nick nominate first is really crappy
He's basically got two guaranteed votes now, he should be allowed to vote after everyone else.
I suppose the only good thing is he can get away with nomming the same two over and over until they go or he goes, which may prevent more votes coming his way. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Posts: 729
|
Quote:
He's basically got two guaranteed votes now, he should be allowed to vote after everyone else.
I suppose the only good thing is he can get away with nomming the same two over and over until they go or he goes, which may prevent more votes coming his way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,088
|
It's actually a ridiculously huge advantage, - it tells the rest of the house who already has two votes, letting the rest of the house know who the easy targets are (as well as telling the remaining 11? housemates that Nick didn't vote for them, so it's much less likely they'll target him. Even if Nick gets 2 votes, it's unlikely that would be enough to put him up.
It's only a drawback a week or two before the end when the numbers are low. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 849
|
Quote:
He's basically got two guaranteed votes now, he should be allowed to vote after everyone else.
I suppose the only good thing is he can get away with nomming the same two over and over until they go or he goes, which may prevent more votes coming his way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
It's actually a ridiculously huge advantage, - it tells the rest of the house who already has two votes, letting the rest of the house know who the easy targets are (as well as telling the remaining 11? housemates that Nick didn't vote for them, so it's much less likely they'll target him. Even if Nick gets 2 votes, it's unlikely that would be enough to put him up.
It's only a drawback a week or two before the end when the numbers are low. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 67,823
|
Quote:
He's basically got two guaranteed votes now, he should be allowed to vote after everyone else.
I suppose the only good thing is he can get away with nomming the same two over and over until they go or he goes, which may prevent more votes coming his way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,981
|
He should have to vote last, otherwise it is a disadvantage to both him and the people he put up.
When has BB been fair lately though? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nikki Grahame ♥ Fan Club
Posts: 60,862
|
I agree it was totally wrong and unfair to make him nom first, now that the other hms have heard his noms, its bound to influence them or at least some of them. Should have waited til the others had nomd to avoid any chance of influencing them, he's now guaranteed two noms from those he nomd and anyone else who disagrees with him.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35.

