so he could use up his immunity early on.

Thats what I would do but they wont

I think they will... As much as the immunity is a pass for him to escape eviction it's also a pass for the others to nominate him without guilt. I mean, they always say that it's so hard to choose, they always say 'oh but I like all of them... This is so difficult,' and now they have someone they know they can put up for eviction whilst also knowing he'll be safe.

Incidently, my money is still on Big Brother re-enacting that launch night twist anyway... I'm sure that's part of the timebomb concept... Time rewinds, they all go through that first task again, everyone ends up with different results. I even think 'Showbiz!' will return.

They won't act tactically as that would label them as gameplayers, which is seen as a negative for BBUK housemates.

I tell you what I thought. That if Nick had nominated Jack, and gave his reason that he did not think that Jack would have a cat in hell's chance of leaving because he was popular, and gave the same reason, voting Harriet. What could BB do. Valid reasons, and tactical.

If they have any sense they will, after all its a game.

Why not.

Seems like BB has given the HM contact lenses that make them think fatso is David Beckham or something.

Fingers crossed there is some kind of twist when he uses his immunity passes!!

I think they'll see it as "wasted", unless he really does a Pauline/Wolfy and becomes so unbearable that he has to go. But I'd probably nominate him every week unless he was my absolute best friend in there (which I doubt, as I can't stand watching him ) for that reason, gives him more chance of using up all his immunity passes.

As he won the public poll and he's also got those immunity passes, he's obviously the clear favourite so it would make tactical sense to vote for him. Right now though I think the housemates will mostly vote for who they aren't getting on with rather than tactically.

and 'showbiz' wins the show. that would be really funny

I suppose if they want to play it tactically they could but if they like Jack, why would they? Some probably won't nominate him because he selflessly turned down the beamer to save his, sorry their £150 grand prize. The worst case scenario is, if they think he's so popular with the viewers that nominating him, will make them unpopular.
I suppose if he is up early on, he might get overconfident and save his 3 immunities for later.

BIB - They will never nominate him for that reason. They think we all love him and would turn against anyone who nominated him.

they should all nominate him for he first 4 weeks then his free passes will be used up , but know how dumb some of them are i can't see it happening

They don't all need to nominate him though. If it's like the last few years then only one or two of them need to nominate him to get him up.

Danny and Harriet are the only ones with any evidence yet that they are popular with the public, whereas the others will want to keep a low profile and not nominate anyone which could change the public's perception of the nominator.

Danny and Harriet could get away with nominating Jack without being in danger themselves but can the others?

That is, if the public really does love Jack and hate anyone who doesn't like Jack.

I'd nominate Jack if I were in there, especially after the fuss he put up the other night. It would be smart for them to nominate him anyway, even if they're his friends, since he has 3 passes and the house won't think he has the possibility to go anyway. So it'd be an easy way to get passed voting other housemates if you're friends with the majority of them.

They have to vote him up three times before he can finally face the public, I don't think it's worth it.

Exactly, that's what I would do if it were me. Whether they are bright enough to work that one out is another matter

I thought it was up to Jack, when he used his immunities. If he thinks he's really popular now, he might save them till later.

I don't think he'd risk it in case there's a twist or something.

They should ,it's risky as they might put themselves up ,,but if you're playing the game you have to get rid of his advantage asap