DS Forums

 
 

Finally removed EE's rootkit of my phone


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23-05-2015, 14:58
Chrysalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581

If anyone here is wanting a guide on how to disable 'computrace agent' the rootkit that appears on all high end EE supplied devices, let me know and I will post a guide.

Before I disabled it, it was causing high battery drain, reverting some settings and slowing down my access to "usage data" stats in android.

Users on XDA have also reported it sending encrypted sms messages to carriers.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 23-05-2015, 15:06
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
Rootkit? Really!? Really!?

Custom firmware maybe but are you accusing EE of putting malware on your phone?

*black helicopters whoosh overhead*
Thine Wonk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 15:08
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,640
Rootkit? Really!? Really!?

Custom firmware maybe but are you accusing EE of putting malware on your phone?
It wouldn't be unheard of, the US networks were caught out with "carrierIQ" and special means to restrict tethering on their phones without payment
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 15:13
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
It wouldn't be unheard of, the US networks were caught out with "carrierIQ" and special means to restrict tethering on their phones without payment
Yes to deliver the service, because as we know from people here, they cheat and don't stick to the terms they signed up to. People want to have unlimited handset data and the carriers know it is popular, but some try and get data for all their services without paying for it. Installing firmware that prevents tethering is understandable and again isn't malware.

Making allegations about carriers putting in a rootkit? Really?
Thine Wonk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 15:16
moox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,640
Yes to deliver the service, because as we know from people here, they cheat and don't stick to the terms they signed up to. People want to have unlimited handset data and the carriers know it is popular, but some try and get data for all their services without paying for it. Installing firmware that prevents tethering is understandable and again isn't malware. It maybe undesirable, but I wouldn't call it a rootkit
carrierIQ wasn't about tethering restriction though - it was more about being able to snoop on a handset's user.

You may have a point, but tethering restriction should be something that is enforced at network level, not by modifying a user's phone


Making allegations about carriers putting in a rootkit? Really?
http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/c...t-you-need-to/ for Carrier IQ - I think something that can track keystrokes, intercept messages, and more is pretty bad, don't you?

I'm not saying that this is what EE are doing, I'm simply saying that the idea is not so farfetched and that the US networks seem to have done it

Computrace appears to be some sort of anti-theft software. http://forum.xda-developers.com/note...nsent-t3113309 suggests that it is installed by Samsung, not EE though. Worrying either way, and makes me glad I stick to Nexus devices
moox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 15:27
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
I'm not saying bad things never happen, just that this is quite a claim to make.

OP - do you have a screenshot showing this using battery or any evidence of it doing anything harmful or unwanted, all SMS is encrypted by the way and without knowing more information I think we're jumping to conclusions calling it Rootkit.
Thine Wonk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 15:40
Chrysalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581
Rootkit? Really!? Really!?

Custom firmware maybe but are you accusing EE of putting malware on your phone?

*black helicopters whoosh overhead*
I classify it as a rootkit.

Anyway its the computrace agent they activate which they can use to block phones that are stolen or sold within the first 6 months (whilst EE still own the phone).

My phone has never been blocked, but I didnt like the behaviour so I disabled it.

Its not hard to do a bit of googling to find out more before deciding to post sarcastic comments, there is even discussions on the EE forum about it.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 15:44
Chrysalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581
I'm not saying bad things never happen, just that this is quite a claim to make.

OP - do you have a screenshot showing this using battery or any evidence of it doing anything harmful or unwanted, all SMS is encrypted by the way and without knowing more information I think we're jumping to conclusions calling it Rootkit.
Well yeah, basically all I did was check the battery data in android, and computrace agent was at the top. It wasnt always draining battery, it seemed to occur on and off for me personally. Did I make a screenshot, I dont think so but I will check and post it if I did. You see on other forums such as XDA, people arent loyal to companies and dont accuse posters of lieing, they take your word for it.

Here is a thread of evidence of the encrypted sms messages.

http://forum.xda-developers.com/note...nsent-t3113309

Also the weird behaviour when I was checking my data usage (weird 30 sec lag) and my "restrict background usage" kept been reverted to the allowed state until I disabled computrace agent.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 15:50
Chrysalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581
carrierIQ wasn't about tethering restriction though - it was more about being able to snoop on a handset's user.

You may have a point, but tethering restriction should be something that is enforced at network level, not by modifying a user's phone



http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/01/c...t-you-need-to/ for Carrier IQ - I think something that can track keystrokes, intercept messages, and more is pretty bad, don't you?

I'm not saying that this is what EE are doing, I'm simply saying that the idea is not so farfetched and that the US networks seem to have done it

Computrace appears to be some sort of anti-theft software. http://forum.xda-developers.com/note...nsent-t3113309 suggests that it is installed by Samsung, not EE though. Worrying either way, and makes me glad I stick to Nexus devices
Yeah the service that controls it is on all modern touchwiz firmwares, but EE is the only EU carrier I am aware of that activates it. Users from other EU carriers have reported computrace agent been activated after installing EE firmware's. Computrace agent is seperate to the hidden samsung service.

When the device is booted the hidden samsung service will protect and restore missing files in the /persdata/absolute/ folder.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 16:18
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
I am not loyal to EE, not even a customer, to claim Rootkit are being put into your phone is a bit mad when it seems a single legitimate process has been put in by the manufacturer and enabled by your carrier.
Thine Wonk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 16:25
Chrysalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581
Definition of a rootkit is something designed to preserve itself and be hidden from the user with root privileges. It doesnt matter who put it there.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 17:53
finbaar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,921
Flashing network supplied phones with either the UK or European generic firmware is an absolute must for me. My G3 had a Vodafone splash screen that drove me crazy.
finbaar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 18:05
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
Definition of a rootkit is something designed to preserve itself and be hidden from the user with root privileges. It doesnt matter who put it there.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rootkit?s=t
Thine Wonk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 19:01
Chrysalis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Leics
Posts: 581
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 21:22
finbaar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,921
I think he is agreeing with you as that is exactly the definition of what you described.
finbaar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2015, 21:35
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
No I'm not agreeing if you looks at most definitions of its malware backdoors or malicious. Just Google it.

As this is legitimate and installed by a reputable company (all be it the OP doesn't want it ) I don't class it as a rootkit.
Thine Wonk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2015, 01:16
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,693
Agreed. The two words there are "malicious" and "unauthorised".
The software on the phone is not malicious nor it is unauthorised.
Therefore it cannot be a rootkit.

if you are one of those who doesn't like this kind of thing then that's fine. It's your right to not like it. Not taking sides. Everyone is different. But just because you don't like it doesn't make it a rootkit.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2015, 15:58
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,389
Computrace appears to be some sort of anti-theft software.
You find Computrace in many BIOSes on corporate grade laptops from Dell, Lenovo and HP.
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2015, 17:09
dabotsonline
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 225
Anyway its the computrace agent they activate which they can use to block phones that are stolen or sold within the first 6 months (whilst EE still own the phone).
This is actually useful to know. Thanks.
dabotsonline is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:21.