Of course it's her choice and good luck to her and her kid but just as she's allowed to choose whatever, I'm allowed to have an opinion.

We grow up in different environments and have different morals, ideals and beliefs. In my world, leaving your kid for 3 mths regardless with whoever is a big deal.

I don't have an opinon in that respect.

Billions of women had babies long before she ever did & some of them have even appeared on Big Brother before too.

What about singers who have kids that go on tour for months on end to make money and leave their kids with child minders?

There's a guaranteed pay off at the end, with BB it's a gamble.

Very much so, he is ever so slowly circling round his intended prey and she hasn't quite grasped what his strategy is, other than he likes her.
Wouldn't want him anywhere near, what a smooth operator he is, to the point of being creepy.
She would be better to steer clear of him and just concentrate on her child....and smoke a bit less, for her own good.

It wouldn't be the first time a woman has entered the BB compound leaving their children behind, why after 16 series do you ask this??

Defeats the 'no contact with the outside' rule

Besides it could be heart breaking for both child and mother which isn't fair on either.

Which is why I can't stand it when pets go in for 5 minutes - the feels are too great

If "SHE" was the father of a child no matter what age it would be far more interesting as well as a miracle of modern science.

Okay, I offered a pedantic reply earlier but -

I'm guessing your meaning was - "What is your opinion of a mother with a young child giving up several weeks of contact with said child in order to be on a reality show which may not actually result in any concrete benefit to either?"

In which case, it might be better if you actually started a thread to that effect and not one that looks a bit idiotic.

Have you ever watched BB before? Last years winner had a child and I'm sure there have been others.

If she's at university/college then maybe her childs grandparents look after the little one, so she knows she's leaving her child in very good hands. I look after my grandson while his parents work and he'd be perfectly happy with us if it was for a day or even a month. He wouldnt suffer in the least. In fact he benefits from spending time with us and vice versa.

Shes very young too have a child and deserves to live a little as well. This chance will never come along again so she should take it while she can.

I think Sarah's child misses her. Therefore I will be voting in favour to reunite them.

I agree.

LMAO, did you just agree with yourself?

Child's with grandmother, no problem, probably having a whale of a time.

Sarah's studying law isn't she, so she's already trying to make a better future for herself and her daughter. I can imagine that I, as a mother with a daughter who is studying, possibly working (does Sarah work?) and who has a young child, would encourage her to go for it and have a break whilst she has the opportunity ... do something for herself.

I wonder if this is someone that has extra accounts accounts and forgot to change the name before agreeing with him/herself.
Ive seen this a couple of times before.
I don't know if this is the case here but when people have done it I don't get it. I have enough to do keeping one account/opinion going without having extra ones to operate lol.

Me too, although it's tempting just to be able to pat myself on the back occasionally and tell myself how wonderful my posts are

The thing with Mothers who have children IS that there will be a Father for the child who I am sure will be more than capable of taking care of her!
I'm sure there is grandparents too and the child will be well taken care of to enable Sarah to go into the house !

On a personal note I am a mum of two daughters and I could never potentially leave them for that long a time, but that's just my own personal opinion & circumstances.

I wonder if the same question would be asked if one of the men had a child in the BB house?