• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Up For Eviction With TWO Nominations?!
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
Dee_110
25-05-2015
Since when exactly?
Hollie_Louise
25-05-2015
Since they could change the rules whenever they want sadly.
Cornchips
25-05-2015
It will be to do with the twist. They want six up or an even number up.
erin_p
25-05-2015
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“It will be to do with the twist. They want six up or an even number up.”

I agree must be twist related .
Groundhogal
25-05-2015
I thought it was the same last year. If you get more than one nom, you're up.
SegaGamer
25-05-2015
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“It will be to do with the twist. They want six up or an even number up.”

Nothing to do with the "twist", they did this last year too. They just change when they feel like it.
SegaGamer
25-05-2015
Originally Posted by Groundhogal:
“I thought it was the same last year. If you get more than one nom, you're up.”

It's 2 or more noms and you are up.........but only when they feel like sticking to that rule.
Cornchips
25-05-2015
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“It's 2 or more noms and you are up.........but only when they feel like sticking to that rule.”

Jade had three last week but wasn't up.
Mr_XcX
25-05-2015
Since they are struggling to get 2m viewers.

They need cash and fast so putting up 6 people gives more vote revenue.
SegaGamer
25-05-2015
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“Jade had three last week but wasn't up.”

Exactly, that is the point i am making here. They stick to the 2 or more noms and you're up rule when they feel like it.
boy_number_8
25-05-2015
I remember one year (it might have been the celebrity version) all you had to do was be nominated once and you were up. Its so stupid. getting two votes should not mean your up, especially when there are 4 people would got more.
Dee_110
25-05-2015
It should have been Jade and Eileen up for eviction and I imagine Jade would have had a good chance of going but maybe the plan is that Jade sticks around a bit longer so chuck a load of other members of the cast into the eviction pot, air some controversial stuff of them and chances are Jade isn't going anywhere!
Alrightmate
25-05-2015
I suppose with so many up it's going to be so much easier to hide Jade from the edit.
PJ2
25-05-2015
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“Exactly, that is the point i am making here. They stick to the 2 or more noms and you're up rule when they feel like it.”

Ridiculous.

Anyone who spend's any money voting is mad.
SegaGamer
25-05-2015
Originally Posted by PJ2:
“Ridiculous.

Anyone who spend's any money voting is mad.”

That is why i have quit voting, the show is rigged.
erin_p
25-05-2015
BB did say received the most nomination not up for eviction, that will be decided after the twist I presume.
cah
25-05-2015
Like Sega said C5 have always had the 2 Noms and your up rule ,but they seem to enforce it when they want ,so chop and change willy-nilly
Dee_110
25-05-2015
Originally Posted by SegaGamer:
“That is why i have quit voting, the show is rigged.”

Yep, they're trying to play us like a fiddle.
benbeez1
25-05-2015
i hate the producers , it should & ALWAYS be the 3 or more housemates with the most votes
Cats_Eyes
26-05-2015
Originally Posted by Cornchips:
“Jade had three last week but wasn't up.”

Is up for about now for - is it eight ?

But she won't go because BB will make sure of that.
coke_pepper
26-05-2015
When they are disingenuous and inconsistent with how many nominations merits being up for the public vote it damages the integrity of the show. It shows poor sportsmanship and quite clearly frustrates the viewers.
On the flip side of the coin it means that they get to choose who stays and who goes, extending the entertainment value (in there eyes) of who they think will contribute most.
It's a poor strategy because it negates the whole process which in turn is far more damaging than any one individuals continued participation and is most likely the area they need to be focusing on to halt the nosedive in viewing figures.
In essence, interfering in such a bold manner with the format in a negative manner will cost them more than the eviction of any housemate ever will. They're just not intelligent enough to understand this.
Virgil Tracy
26-05-2015
Originally Posted by erin_p:
“BB did say received the most nomination not up for eviction, that will be decided after the twist I presume.”

hang on - have they not announced who's up for eviction yet ?

.
connor the judg
26-05-2015
Didn't 3 people get more than 2 nominations? so that's how many were up last week.
patricia50
27-05-2015
This is the reason why I just dip in and out of watching it now instead of religiously watching every show. I've been watching since series one and its gradually got worse and worse since Ch5 took over. They pay no attention to public opinion and then wonder why viewing figures are going down and down.
Mr_XcX
27-05-2015
It should be the 2 with the most IMO.

Head to Head evictions.

That way you can get a good season like BB13 was.

This 2 nominations rule just ruins the show because anyone who could cause drama or a new potential villain for the show is immediately up for the vote and evicted.

Hate to say it but thank goodness for Helen Wood's pass to the finals. Without her it would have been just Ashleigh / Danielle carrying the show that season.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map