• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
BOTS Are Obsessed With Sex/Viewer manipulation!
Colm101
26-05-2015
Everytime i watch BOTS i get soo irritated. Im all for a few rude jokes and all,but they really take it too far.And i worry because i know a lot of young people watch the show and look up to these foolish presenters. Sex this,PUSSY(cat) that, its all just too much.

And on top of all that you have Rylan prancing around practically shoving his sexuality down our throats.By the way i am not homophobic or do i dislike gay people,in fact i voted for marriage equality just yesterday. I just think there is a time and a place for everything.

Even on the panel that Kim Woodburn lady, such a vile old b***h.She should start a new show called -How Clean Is Your Mouth Out with Soap- I swear, if a man her age went on tv and said the things she said he would be crucified.

And the studio audience.. Most of them get paid by BB.They clap when they are told to clap and boo when they are told to boo. The only reason they have a studio audience is so that they can make the chosen HM look like the fav so it rubs off on the viewers at home.The Only show that ever gave real viewers a chance to speak was on Big Brother Big Mouth.But that show ruined BB's agenda so we cant have that anymore.

This show is just a big viewer manipulating pile of turd. And to think i actually use to looked forward to this show (SIGH SMH)

Also live feed was cut so they could manipulate the viewers even more.BB edit the show to split public opinion and thus creating more conversation.

Just a few things i had to get off my chest

What you guys and gals think?
Colm101
26-05-2015
Agree?? Disagree??
Colm101
26-05-2015
Anyone??
Captain Kipper
26-05-2015
Agree with you OP.

I've been saying this for years, BOTS is low rent and tries to influence the viewers...they promote hero and villain HM's to steer us into liking or disliking them.
Groundhogal
26-05-2015
You're probably not getting a lot of comments because it's been mentioned plenty of times before, including a thread I started last night during the show.
Kim was awful but she has so much competition on that show.
joeysneddon
26-05-2015
I take issue with "practically shoving his sexuality down our throat" and suggesting that there “is a time and a place for [acting gay]”.

Fairly certain you wouldn't rag on Keith Lemon for 'shoving his sexuality' down people's throat, nor one of the more... amiable… lasses from something like Geordie Shore — much less suggest that the should only be straight at an 'appropriate time and place'!



The rest is your opinion. But BOTS is a show going out at 11PM, skewed at a young demographic, with a shoe string budget. It is what it is.
acid rain
26-05-2015
This is why Little Brother was better than Bots.

Little Brother wasn't sleazy, it was an informative, respectable show.
Captain Kipper
26-05-2015
Originally Posted by acid rain:
“This is why Little Brother was better than Bots.

Little Brother wasn't sleazy, it was an informative, respectable show.”

Couldn't agree more.

Those were the golden days for the BB sister shows...Dermot was the best presenter they ever had.
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map