DS Forums

 
 

Most stupid answer to a quiz question ever!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23-01-2016, 11:27
valkay
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,280
I was referring to proving that Rome was the only name to be common to all the continents (which was the inference of the question) - that would be a considerably more onerous task.
I would think that there is a "Victoria" on each continent. ?
valkay is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 23-01-2016, 11:40
davads
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,401
I would think that there is a "Victoria" on each continent. ?
Don't tell me, I didn't write the question
davads is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 11:43
jjwales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,443
I wasn't watching it, another TV had it on, i think from Thursday Nights Pointless, question;
Who was the caped crusader?
Answer given was, Superman.
Well, he was caped, and he was a crusader. So not really stupid!
jjwales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 11:53
davelovesleeds
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 10,953
Where did you go to school? This is not the model used in the UK which has separate North and South American continents? I've lived here 60 years and can never remember them being combine into one in general use, the combined model being an alternative of academic interest.
I was schooled in Yorkshire and we were definitely taught that there are only five continents in the world, and we were also given the explanation below.


Not when I went to school in the 50s and 60s, only 5,.... there are only 5 Olympic Rings, one for each continent.
davelovesleeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 12:33
jjwales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,443
I was schooled in Yorkshire and we were definitely taught that there are only five continents in the world
I vaguely remember being told that too, back in 1950s Lancashire.
jjwales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 16:50
The_Bonobo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,501
I was schooled in Yorkshire and we were definitely taught that there are only five continents in the world, and we were also given the explanation below.
That's interesting to hear. Did you also go to school in the 50s or 60s? I was at school later than that and definitely remember being taught there were seven continents. Maybe it changed at some point or does it vary in different schools?
The_Bonobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 17:31
JeffG1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newbury
Posts: 6,749
Maybe when you went to school they hadn't yet discovered the other two...
JeffG1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 17:40
davelovesleeds
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 10,953
That's interesting to hear. Did you also go to school in the 50s or 60s? I was at school later than that and definitely remember being taught there were seven continents. Maybe it changed at some point or does it vary in different schools?
I was there in the 60's and 70's.
davelovesleeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 17:52
The_Bonobo
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,501
I was there in the 60's and 70's.
Thanks well I guess the way it was taught must have changed at some point then. I didn't realize there was so much debate about it actually but it appears there is no definitive correct interpretation.
The_Bonobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 18:44
iaindb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,948
Deleted. Wrong thread.
iaindb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 20:48
lundavra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25,465
That's interesting to hear. Did you also go to school in the 50s or 60s? I was at school later than that and definitely remember being taught there were seven continents. Maybe it changed at some point or does it vary in different schools?
I am sure we were always taught about 'five continents'. 'Six continents' or 'Seven continents' certainly does sound familiar whatever the reasons for adding the extra continents.

I get the impression there is some politics in the choice of numbers. The French use six with one continent of America - is this to knock the USA down in status by including South America?
lundavra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2016, 22:29
bobcar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,718
I think you are stretching it a bit to call the 7 continent model the standard. It is one of several.
Wiki (and other sources) says this.

Originally Posted by WIKI
The 7-continent model is usually taught in Western Europe, Northern Europe, Central Europe, China and most English-speaking countries. The 6-continent combined-Eurasia model is preferred by the geographic community, Russia, Eastern Europe, and Japan. The 6-continent combined-America model is taught in Latin America, the Iberian Peninsula, Italy, Iran and some other parts of Europe; this model may be taught to include only the 5 inhabited continents (excluding Antarctica).[
The fact there are different conventions in use makes the question potentially unanswerable.
It's not unanswerable, using all the definitions South America is the only continent that fitted, no other continent under any of the models fitted.

Whatever people were taught in our schools, the Olympic rings confuse things because people also "know" that each ring symbolises a continent. Five does not allow for North and South America to be separate.
The Olympic rings thing just confuses things, it is not an authoritative source and doesn't include Antarctica which is a continent on almost all models. People probably remember 5 continents because of the rings (easy catchy thing to remember) but that doesn't make it right.
bobcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 08:38
Janet43
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,137
Having been a teacher, I can say that about 50% of what you are taught in school becomes wrong at some point.

Maths is usually OK, but some genius at some point will question even that.

History depends on who's telling it. Different countries, and even regions, tell it from their own point of view.

Geography is always changing even if it's only outlines of countries through coastal erosion.

English is a living language and therefore changes as new words and ways of communicating develop.

The sciences most definitely change as new discoveries are made. For instance, when I was at school in the 1950s who knew that mercury gives off dangerous vapour? And how many of us happily sucked on asbestos fibres when using Rawlplastic for holding screws into walls?

So really a fact may only be a fact depending who's telling it, when it's being told, when it's proven to be completely wrong or until something else supercedes it.
Janet43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 09:14
jjwales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,443
Having been a teacher, I can say that about 50% of what you are taught in school becomes wrong at some point.

Maths is usually OK, but some genius at some point will question even that.

History depends on who's telling it. Different countries, and even regions, tell it from their own point of view.

Geography is always changing even if it's only outlines of countries through coastal erosion.

English is a living language and therefore changes as new words and ways of communicating develop.

The sciences most definitely change as new discoveries are made. For instance, when I was at school in the 1950s who knew that mercury gives off dangerous vapour? And how many of us happily sucked on asbestos fibres when using Rawlplastic for holding screws into walls?

So really a fact may only be a fact depending who's telling it, when it's being told, when it's proven to be completely wrong or until something else supercedes it.
The spelling of "supersedes" hasn't changed though That's one thing I remember from school!
jjwales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 09:16
jjwales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,443
Maybe when you went to school they hadn't yet discovered the other two...
jjwales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 09:45
lundavra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25,465
The spelling of "supersedes" hasn't changed though That's one thing I remember from school!
'supercede' is an older form that was used in the 17th and 18th Century though surprisingly it has not even survived in Transpondian.
lundavra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 09:48
Venetian
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,287
The spelling of "supersedes" hasn't changed though That's one thing I remember from school!
If you say so, but most people get it wrong.
Venetian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 10:42
jsmith99
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 19,936
'supercede' is an older form that was used in the 17th and 18th Century though surprisingly it has not even survived in Transpondian.
I've always used "supercede", on the rare occasions I've used the word. Probably because I've always taken it as stemming from "cede".
jsmith99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 10:44
kmusgrave
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,046
That's interesting to hear. Did you also go to school in the 50s or 60s? I was at school later than that and definitely remember being taught there were seven continents. Maybe it changed at some point or does it vary in different schools?
I was at school in the 60s and 70s and we were taught that there were 5 continents - and each one had the same first and last letter.
kmusgrave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 10:50
Bassthound
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Blackpool
Posts: 612
Having been a teacher, I can say that about 50% of what you are taught in school becomes wrong at some point.

Maths is usually OK, but some genius at some point will question even that.

History depends on who's telling it. Different countries, and even regions, tell it from their own point of view.

Geography is always changing even if it's only outlines of countries through coastal erosion.

English is a living language and therefore changes as new words and ways of communicating develop.

The sciences most definitely change as new discoveries are made. For instance, when I was at school in the 1950s who knew that mercury gives off dangerous vapour? And how many of us happily sucked on asbestos fibres when using Rawlplastic for holding screws into walls?

So really a fact may only be a fact depending who's telling it, when it's being told, when it's proven to be completely wrong or until something else supercedes it.
Agree... I'm sure there was a QI topic where they talked about the percentage of facts they'd given in previous series that had now been proven wrong as knowledge is updated over time.
Bassthound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 10:57
JeffG1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newbury
Posts: 6,749
The spelling of "supersedes" hasn't changed though That's one thing I remember from school!
If you say so, but most people get it wrong.
Doesn't make it right, though. How do you know it's "most" people, anyway?

And the etymology has nothing to do with "cede". It comes from the Latin "supersedere", "to sit above", or be superior to.
JeffG1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 11:13
jjwales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,443
I was at school in the 60s and 70s and we were taught that there were 5 continents - and each one had the same first and last letter.
Yes, I remember that too.
jjwales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 11:15
jjwales
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,443
Doesn't make it right, though. How do you know it's "most" people, anyway?

And the etymology has nothing to do with "cede". It comes from the Latin "supersedere", "to sit above", or be superior to.
Yes, our Latin teacher mentioned that as a way of remembering the English spelling. It's always stuck with me.
jjwales is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 11:59
JeffG1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newbury
Posts: 6,749
Yes, our Latin teacher mentioned that as a way of remembering the English spelling. It's always stuck with me.
As a slight digression, it's sad that Latin isn't taught as a matter of course in schools these days. Much of the English language derives from it, and it helps with the learning of other languages too, which British people in general are notoriously bad at.
JeffG1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2016, 13:44
Venetian
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central London
Posts: 8,287
Doesn't make it right, though. How do you know it's "most" people, anyway?
..
Because I work in an office where the word comes into use quite frequently, part of my job is proof reading and "most people" at work get it wrong, Obviously I cannot do a census of the whole of the population
Venetian is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:14.