|
||||||||
EE Should they recast Peter |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
|
EE Should they recast Peter
In order to make Lauren's return credible should they recast the Peter Beale role as Ben is not going to return ever?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
If Thomas Law is free after that play he's in I'd be cool with him coming back as Peter. I don't know if I want another new face to get used to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,374
|
I think it would be too soon after Ben Hardy, it's pretty likely he not going to return, I'm sure they will in the future but seems too early to be thinking about it, last time was nearly a 3 year gap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 4,618
|
I think we can guarantee that in the lifespan of Peter Beale, he will be back on the square. He's too important a character in the Beale family tree to disappear. Even if it's 20 years down the line, he will be back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 12,992
|
No. You mention Lauren's return being credible. I feel yet another face for Peter wouldn't be credible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 4,645
|
I don't really want Lauren to return at all. I just can't stomach more of the face-pulling, arm-waving and shrieking that accompanies every scene.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Albert Square
Posts: 10,674
|
Thomas Law all the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,128
|
Hopefully no because I don't want Lauren to return full stop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 631
|
You know, I'd be very happy with Tom Law making a return. He's a decent actor and BLOODY GORGEOUS. Oh, sorry. Just slipped out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 376
|
He should be killed off
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
|
Quote:
You know, I'd be very happy with Tom Law making a return. He's a decent actor and BLOODY GORGEOUS. Oh, sorry. Just slipped out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
|
Couldn't disagree more always thought it was a shame Ben gave up the role when he did with the Lucy storyline and bringing Thomas back or re-casting would be interesting because it will be about February or March next year when Lauren returns on-screen and with Kathy back this would bring the Lucy story back to life
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 525
|
Knowing EE, Lauren will come back with no mention of Peter. Oh he might be mentioned in passing but that will be it. No Peter shouldn't be recast, he should move over to the Steven department, odd mention every 4 years.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Winter is coming.
Posts: 13,324
|
Awful lot of people here trash-talking MyLauren
I'm going to have to politely insist that it stops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Herr Flick's dungeon
Posts: 5,939
|
Yeah!
With the eyebrow-tastic Thomas Law! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Albert Square
Posts: 10,674
|
Quote:
Awful lot of people here trash-talking MyLauren
I'm going to have to politely insist that it stops. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
|
Quote:
Awful lot of people here trash-talking MyLauren
I'm going to have to politely insist that it stops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
|
I think after Lauren and Peters sentimental exit in February that it seems a shame to either split them up offscreen or to recast Peter too soon. I think either option will undermine and subtract from their exit.
Peter shouldn't be recast for at least 5 years in my honest opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,746
|
If they don't bring back Peter Lauren will be added to the list of single females saddled with a pointless child. Unless they have a miscarriage off camera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,202
|
Yes and he should come back with Lauren.
Peter has already had a few different heads so what difference will one more make |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,206
|
Quote:
If they don't bring back Peter Lauren will be added to the list of single females saddled with a pointless child. Unless they have a miscarriage off camera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 414
|
no! Bring Ben back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
She never seemed sexy to me, but I tried bashing off to her the other day, and it was good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 23,726
|
Quote:
no! Bring Ben back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North of England
Posts: 14,124
|
I like Lauren, but now's the time to let another young female character shine. She had her spotlight so I'm not going to care too much if she doesn't hurry back. I personally wouldn't mind her coming back with Tanya who I reckon should return sometime next year.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:18.




I'm going to have to politely insist that it stops.