DS Forums

 
 

Fix!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-05-2015, 20:14
connor the judg
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 8,770

Yes
THE TWIST IS A FIX! It's JUST SO WE GET MORE ENTERTAINMENT! HOW DEAR THEY COME UP WITH A GOOD IDEA!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'M GOING TO MAKE 100 COMPLAINTS TO OFCOM!
connor the judg is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 27-05-2015, 20:18
yohinnchild
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kandy Kitchen
Posts: 37,693
Who cares

All the crap ones barring Jack are now up
yohinnchild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:21
SegaGamer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
Well if you think fixing the show and ruining the credibility of the show is entertaining then good for you, you are exactly the kind of fan channel 5 has been searching for.
SegaGamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:23
wazzyboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,514
Depends what you call entertainment. I like it when the housemates decide who is up.
wazzyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:24
WeeJintyMcGinty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,435
Well if you think fixing the show and ruining the credibility of the show is entertaining then good for you, you are exactly the kind of fan channel 5 has been searching for.
Credibility ? BB ? LOL.

Have you been timebombed into the future from 2001 ?
WeeJintyMcGinty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:25
quasimoron
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 19,590
The fence sitters, clever bitches that target others and useless ones are now up, so its all good. Sadly the most useless one Jack is safe now.
quasimoron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:25
WhatJoeThinks
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 10,236
LOL! Damn the production team and their meddling! How dare they save the most entertaining HMs without telling us first!
WhatJoeThinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:30
wazzyboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,514
Why do they need saving if they are so entertaining? Let me guess, they'd get voted out otherwise. So not everyone thinks they are all that entertaining then eh?
wazzyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:30
lon_chaney
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,469
Manipulating the show in favour of any housemate isnt a good idea.
Prolonging the Jade Show just means other stories that would have evolved between other HMs dont.
lon_chaney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:30
JVS
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8,737
They should do this more often - have a whole series randomly alternating between saving the nominees and putting them up. That would really screw with their heads.
JVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:34
SegaGamer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
LOL! Damn the production team and their meddling! How dare they save the most entertaining HMs without telling us first!
I wonder what you will think when they come up with a fix that goes against your favourite HM, i bet you won't be thinking the same way then.
SegaGamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:40
WhatJoeThinks
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 10,236
Why do they need saving if they are so entertaining? Let me guess, they'd get voted out otherwise. So not everyone thinks they are all that entertaining then eh?
It's quite simple really. The HMs always nominate the people who are the most interesting (love them or hate them) and the quiet, boring ones slip under the radar. The public only get the chance to vote for the HMs with the most nominations, usually, so they have to pick one of the entertaining ones. This way the least entertaining ones are all up for eviction. Don't you think that's a good thing?
WhatJoeThinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:43
Cornchips
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 67,823
Well if you think fixing the show and ruining the credibility of the show is entertaining then good for you, you are exactly the kind of fan channel 5 has been searching for.
To be fair it lost its credibility circa 2007. Pure BB has long gone and although I'm a fan from the very beginning I've had to move with the times. When I have been unable to move with the times such as putting up with the likes of Helen and Perez I've switched off and found something else to do.
Cornchips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:44
WeeJintyMcGinty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,435
I wonder what you will think when they come up with a fix that goes against your favourite HM, i bet you won't be thinking the same way then.
It's just a tacky downmarket gameshow, not real life.

Yes it's a bit annoying that BB have done this to save Eileen but fck em - the basic tenet of BB still remains the same, regardless of this manipulation. HMs still have to balance popularity with both their fellow HMs and with the public, no matter what the twist/interference. Eileen can only win if the public want her to, BB don't decide that.
WeeJintyMcGinty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:44
connor the judg
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 8,770
I wonder what you will think when they come up with a fix that goes against your favourite HM, i bet you won't be thinking the same way then.
i KNOW!!!!!!!!

IF IT WOULD BE A FIX AGAINST JADE IT WOULD BE GREAT!!!!!!!!
connor the judg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:44
WhatJoeThinks
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 10,236
I wonder what you will think when they come up with a fix that goes against your favourite HM, i bet you won't be thinking the same way then.
I don't get that invested. If I had to pick a favourite at the moment it would probably be Nick, but if he was kicked out tomorrow I wouldn't give a fig.
WhatJoeThinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:45
Cornchips
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 67,823
It's quite simple really. The HMs always nominate the people who are the most interesting (love them or hate them) and the quiet, boring ones slip under the radar. The public only get the chance to vote for the HMs with the most nominations, usually, so they have to pick one of the entertaining ones. This way the least entertaining ones are all up for eviction. Don't you think that's a good thing?
Upto a point. However the boring ones will still be there after Friday. I don't like either Harriet or the twins but at least the add more than Danny or Chloe.
Cornchips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:45
Stigofthedump
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,231
Yes
THE TWIST IS A FIX! It's JUST SO WE GET MORE ENTERTAINMENT! HOW DEAR THEY COME UP WITH A GOOD IDEA!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'M GOING TO MAKE 100 COMPLAINTS TO OFCOM!
This is the only twist I have ever liked. I'm also pleased to see we will be getting more entertainment.
Stigofthedump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:47
sorcha_healy27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,941
Yes
THE TWIST IS A FIX! It's JUST SO WE GET MORE ENTERTAINMENT! HOW DEAR THEY COME UP WITH A GOOD IDEA!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'M GOING TO MAKE 100 COMPLAINTS TO OFCOM!


Really?
sorcha_healy27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:47
Janette800
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Wales...Land of the Dragon
Posts: 11,430
Let's hope Harriet gets the boot
Janette800 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:48
SegaGamer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
It's quite simple really. The HMs always nominate the people who are the most interesting (love them or hate them) and the quiet, boring ones slip under the radar. The public only get the chance to vote for the HMs with the most nominations, usually, so they have to pick one of the entertaining ones. This way the least entertaining ones are all up for eviction. Don't you think that's a good thing?
If you put every HM up i guarantee that one of the ones you consider to be entertaining would still go.
SegaGamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:48
TheManWhoLaughs
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,088
It's quite simple really. The HMs always nominate the people who are the most interesting (love them or hate them) and the quiet, boring ones slip under the radar.
Nick, Joel and Christian are all simpering mute dullards and they were all up for eviction this week.

When the cast has only a couple of entertaining housemates who the production team are forced to save, the series is shit no matter how much they rig things to save them (cf the Speidi season).
TheManWhoLaughs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:48
WeeJintyMcGinty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,435
I don't get that invested. If I had to pick a favourite at the moment it would probably be Nick, but if he was kicked out tomorrow I wouldn't give a fig.
Same here - I'm baffled how anyone can still get steamed up over this trivial nonsense. It's quite funny though.
WeeJintyMcGinty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:49
DamienS
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,851
I love how big brother basically just sticks its fingers up to everyone
DamienS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 20:49
Cats_Eyes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 2,546
The fence sitters, clever bitches that target others and useless ones are now up, so its all good. Sadly the most useless one Jack is safe now.




He was safe in any case - for the first three evictions.
Cats_Eyes is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:19.