DS Forums

 
 

This might one be twist too far for me


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27-05-2015, 23:26
DUNDEEBOY
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,295

Okay my fave Sarah is in real danger of going however, it just goes against everything big brother stands for.

Yes they have had swapped noms before, they have did the quadruple before but to do both is just one step far and basically tells you noms mean nothing and if the result isn't correct there will just ignore them and do what they like.

Depends what types they bring in whether I stick with it
DUNDEEBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 27-05-2015, 23:29
bb2011fan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,429
I honestly cannot believe it. I don't know what to think and I'm someone who hates people who complains. I've been loving this series. I don't want to see four people leave
bb2011fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:32
yohinnchild
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kandy Kitchen
Posts: 37,693
To be honest last year was a joke with nomms anyway for interfering etc.

Again I don't see this as anything that different and to be honest means we are rid of a load of deadwoood

I guess I would care more if there was some HMs I liked being in trouble of going, but there isnt
yohinnchild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:32
Verence
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kessingland, Suffolk
Posts: 85,565
If I was still voting on BB evictions then this total farce would make me stop
Verence is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:33
DUNDEEBOY
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,295
To be honest last year was a joke with nomms anyway for interfering etc.

Again I don't see this as anything that different and to be honest means we are rid of a load of deadwoood

I guess I would care more if there was some HMs I liked being in trouble of going, but there isnt
Danny is deadwood and is the safest of all.

However the newbies rarely work they just pick them off week by week
DUNDEEBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:36
yohinnchild
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kandy Kitchen
Posts: 37,693
Danny is deadwood and is the safest of all.

However the newbies rarely work they just pick them off week by week
I guess it depends really - some newbies can be good (Aisleyne for instance and even HMs like Tim, Jonty, Sara, Kinga, Eugene were good)

Although if they're like last years lot then god help us
yohinnchild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:36
gator8
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 794
Surely Sepp Blatter came up with this twist.
gator8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:36
dirrrty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 8,222
They did something similar BB6. All those who didn't nominate were up.
dirrrty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:36
nagel84
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,467
I've been thinking much the same. It's become so far removed from the show I first became massively drawn to (BB1) that I don't know why I now bother.

Just when you thought it had reached the bottom in terms of sensationalist nonsense it only goes and outdoes itself once again.
nagel84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:36
SegaGamer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
To be honest last year was a joke with nomms anyway for interfering etc.

Again I don't see this as anything that different and to be honest means we are rid of a load of deadwoood

I guess I would care more if there was some HMs I liked being in trouble of going, but there isnt
I don't see how that "deadwood" excuse is even fair. They may be deadwood to you but they have fans and the people in charge of this show are putting 2 fingers up to the fans of those HM's. It's a joke, we have twist after twist after twist just to save HM's that they don't want to see leave.

I wouldn't mind twists like this once or twice a series, but we are getting ridiculous twists like this every few days. It's a farce.
SegaGamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:37
paperdreams
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 661
I think it's unfair, but perhaps more importantly I hate new housemates! I can rarely connect (sound like I'm nominating here ) to them. Maybe 1 would be fine, but 4 is too many IMO.

I'm not particularly passionate about any of those up, but I don't think they deserve to be evicted in this way.
paperdreams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:37
chloedancer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,153
its a siily twist and sarah will go,and ill be annoyed and i realize i'm being a hypocrite, but why not do the 4 out with the original nominations? if they have to do it
chloedancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:38
benbeez1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11,976
why can't they do a triple instead
benbeez1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:38
brad_reg
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 344
This has ruined the series for me. It just makes a mockery of it all. What is the point in even having noms if they are just ignored?
brad_reg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:40
wazzyboy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 9,514
They did something similar BB6. All those who didn't nominate were up.
But IIRC it was weeks in and part of BB lying to HMs all week. And we knew before the noms were done. So it didn't smack of keeping certain people safe after nominations.
wazzyboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:40
Warp
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,030
I thought this year was going to be a bit more relaxed on intervention, there goes that idea.
Warp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:40
aurichie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,100
Surely Sepp Blatter came up with this twist.
Still can't stop the twist of him fawning over the royal family, prime minister and English World Cup bid only to privately encourage everyone to vote against the bid and humiliate them.
aurichie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:40
cah
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 18,890
I've said on other Threads ,we can't get to know the lot that are in there properly so don't see the point of 4 new ones

I've never liked New H'MS anyway

For the 1st time since bb began 15 years ago i'm about ready to give up on it
cah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:46
nagel84
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,467
To be honest last year was a joke with nomms anyway for interfering etc.

Again I don't see this as anything that different and to be honest means we are rid of a load of deadwoood
If they wanted rid of deadwood it would have been better to have made it a vote to save and even then getting rid of 4, particularly out of a possible 6, seems more than a bit too much.

I certainly don't consider Sarah to be deadwood and it's likely IMO that she'll go. As much as I don't like Harriet I don't think she's been the type of housemate that would usually be considered deadwood. Anything but in fact.
nagel84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:53
Seveneyes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Old Trafford
Posts: 12,516
I said the same before this 4 out 4 in rubbish...kinda funny to see some of those laughing cause the twins were going now fretting cause it's 4...ill have a look at the newbies same as you DB but I'm probs out for this series,couldn't even watch tonight..gonna take a hell of a good housemate to pull me back in.
Seveneyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:55
TVScanner99
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 746
The new rule is...

Big Brother can change the rules at any time and can do whatever they wish.

At the end of the day, if the housemate was so popular they'd survive this quadruple eviction. If not, then tough.
TVScanner99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-05-2015, 23:59
andrewr
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Posts: 183
It's an awful twist. The wrong house mates are up now, and four out/in is too much change in one go.
andrewr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2015, 00:03
eva_prior
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 2,408
I guess I am the only FM who likes it !
eva_prior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2015, 00:05
Vulpes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: lalaland
Posts: 1,411
Bloody ridiculous.
Vulpes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2015, 00:06
jeanoj
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Posts: 19,833
I've said on other Threads ,we can't get to know the lot that are in there properly so don't see the point of 4 new ones

I've never liked New H'MS anyway

For the 1st time since bb began 15 years ago i'm about ready to give up on it
Me too. There is far too much interference IMO. Not just with nominations, although that is bad enough, but also giving them so much information from the outside world and causing arguments and disagreements when there is no necessity to do this. I am at the point when I am done with BB. I know we have to move with the times and things must change but surely not for the worse? Recent years have been so far removed from the original concept of Big Brother that I think the producers have really lost the plot.
jeanoj is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:32.