Surely the logical way to do a "cull the dull" eviction would be to put every housemate up (I guess they'd still have to let Jack know and give him the chance to use his pass, sadly) rather than just sticking up six who weren't even nominated? Do they eve think these things through?

I think they just consult the asparagus for all their important decisions.

but that would've meant deciding to do that before the noms last Sunday .

I think they thought things would liven up after nomms but it hasn't really , so they figure the need a transfusion , but they also needed to do something to get public attention - 4-way eviction .

.

This way they can guarantee a certain HM or HMs will be safe, all up vote to save they couldn't.

Harsh on the asparagus.

because this is an ENTERTAINMENT show, not a zoo for watching nice people talk to each other about nothing very much while playing some childish gunge games.

so... if those "up" are seen as "deadwood" and not entertaining and thus making the show dull.. that is why...

of course with only 45 minutes to fill each day.. how many "rylan" like shreeking clowns can you take in one show...
the answer of course is where you want to position the show for advertisers.. and if your target is keith lemon's audience the answer is lobotomize the viewers and enjoy

^Did you even read the opening post?

This post makes no sense in correlation with the OP's post.

An all-up vote to save (note: not evict) would more than likely weed out the so-called 'deadwood'/dull housemates.

I agree. They should have said that due to so much noms discussions, this weeks noms are void and as punishment all housemates will face the public vote.

I don't understand how this makes sense as a response to the OP. It's almost as if you're answering an entirely different post altogether.