|
||||||||
sarah fav to go |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: about to jack satan shhhh
Posts: 684
|
sarah fav to go
oddschecker and she's the only one listed in next eviction section, so i asume only 1 of the 4 are realy getting evicted the others will probably enter a secret house
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: London
Posts: 9,192
|
There had better not be a secret house, I want Harriet gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mayfair
Posts: 49,860
|
Nope that's a mistake as it only has her on there at 12/1. Pretty sure half of thr others will have lower odds than that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,087
|
If it's a secret house it's pathetic because that's not even a twist , the twist would be 4 leaving for good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,530
|
Could be a mistake. Pretty sure Twins will be fave, followed by Harriet, Sarah then Kieran.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 🕳
Posts: 1,858
|
Good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: about to jack satan shhhh
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
If it's a secret house it's pathetic because that's not even a twist , the twist would be 4 leaving for good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,980
|
People are spending money to evict not put people into a secret house.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Shall I be the cat? =^..^=
Posts: 31,759
|
There is no secret house for goodness sake. They would have had to clarify it before opening the phone lines, else they'd be hauled over the coals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: about to jack satan shhhh
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
There is no secret house for goodness sake. They would have had to clarify it before opening the phone lines, else they'd be hauled over the coals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,980
|
Quote:
i take you don't know how bb works they can change the rules at anytime any rule
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Shall I be the cat? =^..^=
Posts: 31,759
|
Quote:
i take you don't know how bb works they can change the rules at anytime any rule
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 97,118
|
Quote:
oddschecker and she's the only one listed in next eviction section, so i asume only 1 of the 4 are realy getting evicted the others will probably enter a secret house
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 39,227
|
Oddschecker list the source of the odds as Paddy Power, but Paddy Power don't have their eviction market open: http://www.paddypower.com/bet/novelt...ng/big-brother
So i'd suggest everyone ignores this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,808
|
Harriet and the Twins would be my choice. Don't care who the other two are
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 39,227
|
Quote:
that's not a twist then is it if they do what they say and evict 4 for good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,978
|
Quote:
Harriet and the Twins would be my choice. Don't care who the other two are
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Left London
Posts: 19,882
|
Quote:
Oddschecker list the source of the odds as Paddy Power, but Paddy Power don't have their eviction market open: http://www.paddypower.com/bet/novelt...ng/big-brother
So i'd suggest everyone ignores this. shows up for me
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
Quote:
i take you don't know how bb works they can change the rules at anytime any rule
Did you not see the big reality television scandal in the news in 2008? |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In a building
Posts: 24,022
|
It cant be true a secret house can it. Remember numbers how are BB going to have 4 new housemates enter and at some point 3 of the four 'evicted' tonight will come back. How will they evict all this lot in the remaining weeks ? More mass evictions may be.
I think BB should be careful here they could make this whole time bomb twist thing over complicated here , it could look a mess then. Mind you i've just thought if the 4 new housemates aren't able to win and are in the house only for a temporary period then BB don't have to think about finding the time and weeks to evict them. They could even go out of the side door i.e diary room. Damn BB don't mess this up and make it over complicated
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 938
|
obviously there is so error in odd checkers website that has caused the others not to show and odds of 8 will get you 1 are the type of odds you generally see for the most likely to stay..NOT the most likely to leave
edit *1 will get you 8* |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
|
Quote:
Not where the public spending money to vote is concerned .... as they found out to their detriment the first and second time they returned previously evicted HM's to the house.
![]() The two times I can remember when they returned previously evicted HMs are Jon (bb4) and Nikki (bb8). I don't think they found anything to their detriment about Jon's return, except that it was a damp squib. What happened with Nikki's is that the regulator accepted that BB could change the rules, but hadn't made the rule change sufficiently clear to viewers (specifically by not changing the copy of the rules on the show's website). So BB can change the rules but has to tell people that they're changed before the vote begins, so that viewers aren't misled. Quote:
Evidently you don't.
Did you not see the big reality television scandal in the news in 2008? |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
|
Sarah is NOT the fave to go
Oddschecker is messing up. Here are the current odds from Paddypower's website:
8/11 -- Amy and Sally 9/4 --- Harriet 6/1 --- Chloe 7/1 --- Kieran 8/1 --- Sarah 12/1 -- Danny |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
Quote:
I probably did at the time, but I don't still remember which scandal it was. Many shows were found guilty and fined. Lots of shows were playing fast and loose when it came to the public voting for something by phone and spending their own money. The upshot of it was that TV shows have to be completely transparent when it comes to the public vote and when it comes to the show explaining clearly what the public are voting for. No ambiguity is allowed and you have to be crystal clear. I've just dug up an old article from a quick Google search.... http://www.express.co.uk/finance/cit...-phone-in-scam Here's a list of ITV shows named and shamed....http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...mmes-here.html If you root around there are other articles from around the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 9,918
|
If four of them are going those odds look too good. The top four are almost dead certs, so why can you get good odds on Kieran and Chloe for example?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41.




