• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
This is why Aaron was ejected from the house
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
little-monster
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by Maxine_Roch:
“This is an absolute joke i'm not a fan of Aaron but no way should he have got removed becauase of that he should have got a warning at most .”

Maybe Aaron has been warned for something else

Big brother are sly with the editing. Helen was warned loads last year, but only about 2 of her warnings ever made it to the finished edited episode.
Nate_Thomas
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“It wasn't just a flash, I think he was removed because he wouldn't stop doing it.”

Yes and it's different from the other person just laughing about it he was asked to stop.
Dangermoose
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by Maxine_Roch:
“This is an absolute joke i'm not a fan of Aaron but no way should he have got removed becauase of that he should have got a warning at most .”

I don't think anyone can judge until the footage has been aired and we've seen it in its full (edited) context.
Jimmy Skitz
28-05-2015
sorry but if Danny had done this to Sarah and she reacted how Joel did people on here wouldn't be making excuses, equality works both ways
Nate_Thomas
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by Jimmy Skitz:
“sorry but if Danny had done this to Sarah and she reacted how Joel did people on here wouldn't be making excuses, equality works both ways”

That is rubbish he would of got the same treatment or worse.
Jimmy Skitz
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by Nate_Thomas:
“That is rubbish he would of got the same treatment or worse.”

Exactly Danny would have been castigated but people are sticking up for Aaron
emptybox
28-05-2015
Doesn't seem a good enough reason to throw somebody out.
But then they are throwing four people out on Friday, for no good reason, so they probably thought one more wouldn't make any difference.
Jimmy Skitz
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by emptybox:
“Doesn't seem a good enough reason to throw somebody out.
But then they are throwing four people out on Friday, for no good reason, so they probably thought one more wouldn't make any difference.”

they should reduce that to 3 now IMO
Littlegreen42
28-05-2015
I don't think people are understanding why he has been removed, it would seem it's not because he was simply flipping out his penis... it's because despite being told many times to basically put it away by others - he didn't listen.
pugamo
28-05-2015
Jimmy Skitz
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“I don't think people are understanding why he has been removed, it would seem it's not because he was simply flipping out his penis... it's because despite being told many times to basically put it away by others - he didn't listen.”

exactly, that would be considered a sexual assault in the outside world
What a shambles
28-05-2015
Must have been more serious than what they are leaking to the likes of tellymix.

Damage limitation.

Has Victor removed his tweet yet?
Jimmy Skitz
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by What a shambles:
“Must have been more serious than what they are leaking to the likes of tellymix.

Damage limitation.

Has Victor removed his tweet yet?”

what did he say?
acid rain
28-05-2015
When Bianca kept throwing herself at Winston it was seen as acceptable by Big Brother.
Nate_Thomas
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by acid rain:
“When Bianca kept throwing herself at Winston it was seen as acceptable by Big Brother.”

I don't remember him saying no.
kaceyy
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by Nate_Thomas:
“I don't remember him saying no.”

Winston constantly rebuffed her advances and threads were made on here regarding had he been a woman this would have been handled differently.
Jean_Daniels
28-05-2015
4 words,there is a god!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MissDeeBlue
28-05-2015
All I can say is
'its all in the SCRIPT'

Aaron knew his role in this ch5 panto hand he's acted his scenes.

I'm off to get my interval choc-ice from the usherette
cyro
28-05-2015
Perhaps they knew 4 girls would be going and removed him to even it out a bit.
aurichie
28-05-2015
There is absolutely no justification for vile behaviour of that nature. I'm disgusted BB is even considering airing the footage. This could be the final straw. BB will never recover from this if they air it.
Bagshot85
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by JillyA:
“Oh f*** its gonna be ShowBiz!!!”

Which won't be as bad as who I heard it might be.
Spoiler
Nikki
JVS
28-05-2015
It's good publicity for the show, viewing figures for Celeb BB went up after Jeremy Jackson was ejected. Aaron may have been sacrificed for their own purposes, they may have been waiting for such an excuse.
trevor tiger
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by Jimmy Skitz:
“sorry but if Danny had done this to Sarah and she reacted how Joel did people on here wouldn't be making excuses, equality works both ways”

Do you mean equality between heterosexual men and homosexual men

If Danny exposed himself in a sexual manner to Sarah and she asked him to stop I'm pretty sure the other HMs wouldn't be laughing like they were apparently when Aaron was doing this to Joel.
pugamo
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by aurichie:
“There is absolutely no justification for vile behaviour of that nature. I'm disgusted BB is even considering airing the footage. This could be the final straw. BB will never recover from this if they air it.”

Oh don't be ridiculous. This forum is full of drama queens.
Jimmy Skitz
28-05-2015
Originally Posted by trevor tiger:
“Do you mean equality between heterosexual men and homosexual men

If Danny exposed himself in a sexual manner to Sarah and she asked him to stop I'm pretty sure the other HMs wouldn't be laughing like they were apparently when Aaron was doing this to Joel.”

exactly my point, just because he's Gay doesn't mean he should get away with something like this
<<
<
2 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map