Surely the inconsistency in twists and favoring certain housemates over others means that the producer can rig the votes. By rig I mean the producers mass voting out who they want evicted. I don't think that there is a rule that says that producers can't interfere with the votes by voting themselves. I can see this happening especially in cases of close votes where they want one storyline (ie Ash and Helen's romance) prevailing against another (Hurricane Toya).

I don't think people who work for Channel 5 are allowed to vote.
At least, that was certainly the rule in the Channel 4 days.

Judging by last year's result I think viewer's votes are put in a skip and BB producers pick winners/losers out of a hat.

It might be a rule, it should be, but there's no way to enforce it.

Surely WHAT means that they rig the votes?

That part seems to be missing.

They wouldn't do it because of the consequences if it came out.

a cheap pay as you go mobile with a couple of hundred pound credit would be impossible to trace.

Does anyone actually care any more in the outside world, they know BB is flawed and just shrug their shoulders and go back to their Times crosswords. Sorry, Star word searches.

That doesn't make any difference to what I said.

you're talking about the consequences if it came out, and i'm saying it would never come out, as it would be impossible to trace. it could never come out with an unregistered pay as you go, therefore there could be no consequences.