• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
'Fess up. Did you cry when........
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
silly sausage
29-05-2015
well I liked them. I'd sooner see a man who had a heart attack and decided to follow his dream while he still could, team up with his sons and have a great time, than constantly see weeping women telling us all they're 'doing it for their kids'. Maybe they're not the greatest singers in the world, but I'm fed up with screaming screeching woman showing us their fillings and what they ate for dinner when they deliver a song. I couldn't stand Alexandra Burke or Sam Bailey, but I understood their appeal and accepted they won. I liked the Neal's and i hope they do well in the final, just as I hope the choir, Jules and Matisse and Old Men Grooving do well.
topcat3
29-05-2015
I don't think the heart attack thing was relevant, it shouldn't have been mentioned
Blondie X
29-05-2015
Not at all. It was the most blatent attempt to tug on the heartstrings yet and was beyond cheesy.

Only if Peter Andre, Olly Murs, Mark Wright and Christopher Maloney formed a group could there be more cheese on one stage
SegaGamer
29-05-2015
No, i'm not a sucker for these things. They are set up in a way to get people to vote for them when they ain't really that great and this country fool's for it everytime. They did that because it was the only way they could get through. They weren't that great and they were in my bottom 3 on the day.

I'm fine with all of the finalists so far but the dog act and these guys were really not all that great.
SugarNSpice
29-05-2015
Originally Posted by jerefprdterra:
“People voted because they felt sympathy for them, and not because of their singing.”

Yes, I suspect this was the case with some voters seeing as they were not great singers. I probably would've been inclined give them a vote if I felt sympathy and was moved by their performance, but I wasn't.
The Prumeister
29-05-2015
I've had more emotional poos tbh.
fleur2013
29-05-2015
I missed some of BGT last night and watch it today. I agree and disagree with some of the comments here. I prefer their audition rather than their live performance. I'm not sure what vocal range they are. It looks like a Karaoke get together. Doesn't surprise me. People like hearing emotional stories and maybe have sympathy for them.
lovecat86
29-05-2015
I did but I also teared up at the Kanneh-Masons...
lovecat86
29-05-2015
Also, just because I got teary doesn't mean I'm some super fan - they got a grand total of zero of my votes. I didn't rate their singing, just thought that act was sweet.
leelee69
29-05-2015
Just reminded me of one of Peter Kays spoof acts. Just rename them R'Dad and it's spot on.
Cestrian18
29-05-2015
Originally Posted by leelee69:
“Just reminded me of one of Peter Kays spoof acts. Just rename them R'Dad and it's spot on.”

Hahahahaha, it really did- It was so saccharine and cringeworthy, plus the dad is just awful cabaret standard- It was so bad on so many levels so I'm amazed they were put through but each to their own
Sick Bullet
29-05-2015
Nah it was way to cheesy
feckit
29-05-2015
"Neal....Neal...................Orange Peal"
<<
<
2 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map