Nonsense. If she was able to deal with losing, she wouldn't have been crying last night.

She's probably one of those kids with pushy parents.

All the judges should have voted for her.
she was sensational unlike the comedian.

O.K. so that is a sport not a t.v. entertainment, good luck if she gets to the Olympics but what has that to do with BGT.?

So what do you say about the numbert of adult losers who are distraught.
ANYONE who has just lost and is standing in front of thousands of people, not to mention millions watching on TV would find it hard not to be emotional.
Pushy parents? They didn't seenm to be,but they were immensley proud of her and rightly so.
There are some mean spirited, jealous people on this forum, aren't there?

I'm no sports fan, and I thought she was entertaining.

Get your grandson on next year's show!

Hahahahahaha....

I'd give this post a golden buzzer

Can the poster making this huge claim Post a video of him performing as well as Jesse, so we can all see him ?
No? Didn't think so!

I have to say I agree with some of the posters on here. I'm not sure her act is actually a "talent" as such, more of a skill acquired. She is undoubtedly good at what she does, but whether BGT is the right showcase for it, I'm not entirely sure. Singers, dancers, musicians, impressionists, comedians etc are talented in my opinion, but I'm not so sure about some of the more "circus" type acts, of which she would be one. As someone else said, it is really just a sport that she has learnt. My son is a very talented swimmer, but obviously (lack of swimming pool aside) I wouldn't consider that a suitable act or "talent" to be appearing on BGT.

I actually really liked Boyband. I was simply being as dismissive about them as the poster was being towards Jessie Jane. Although to be honest I don't think they were as good as Diversity. I don't think any dance act on BGT has been as good as diversity. But that personally opinion doesn't take away from the talent of these acts.

Basically I was trying to point out not everybody likes the same thing and saying a child who is so good at her chosen sport she is a multiple world champion was 'gurning' in a silly outfit is just ridiculous.

Your comment is incredibly narrow minded she gave the performance everything she was just gutted to not get through to the final. Granted maybe she should not have cried but the girl 9 she was just gutted.

Well she could get a wildcard

I reckon that's a certainty.

I agree. She's got a skill, not a talent and this isn't the platform.

Out of all the 5 wildcards, she is the one is desperately don't want in the final

do hope not

Because it's annoying and she shouldn't be in the competition if she can't cope. Her place could have gone to a more deserving act such as the comedy trampolinist.

if you get annoyed cos a kid cries then I hope you never have kids

I think she is a terrific wee personality and her act is very unusual and mesmerising . Her experience has allowed her to be choreographed in such a way as to display her immense talent . She won't win, and I think she knows that , but getting to the final will mean a big deal to her , hence the tears when she thought she'd lost her chance .Anyway half the adults cry when they miss out or even when they get through, no big deal .

I don't know why you're separating sports talent from all other forms of talent. Martial Arts is a skill but so is singing, dancing, honing impressions, playing an instrument, making people laugh... They're are all learnt too... no one is born being able to play the piano, although a musical prodigy may be able to teach themselves at a very early age.

Nor work with them nor babysit them.

What rubbish - she should not have been in the show - it is a sport

So is gymnastics but Spellbound won. Britains Got Talent is open for any act and any age.

I'd rather watch the overweight Irish kid dance naked, than that awful kid with the girlfriend again.

He was nauseating, and thinks he's better than he is.

Fingers crossed.