DS Forums

 
 

Three 4G Discussion Thread (Part 2)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13-12-2015, 12:38
PrinceGaz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Posts: 8,175
I put a 3 PAYG in my iPhone 6 yesterday to test at my mate's house in Fleet, Hants. The 4G 800 worked intermittently, as it kept picking up a sliver of 3G (which is unusable for calls and ends up always dropping) in preference.

When the phone stayed on the 4G 800 the VoLTE worked well and calling the top up line was instant and quality crisp.

Very obvious the priority is wrong, or they need to reduce the transmit power of the 3G/2100 a tiny amount.
Reducing the power of the 3G2100 wouldn't really help, it would just move the same problem a bit closer to the mast.

I feel the current priority is correct given that they only have 5MHz of 4G800 to play with, but they need to adjust it so that it only jumps to a weaker 3G2100 (or 4G1800 if VoLTE gets enabled on it) if the signal strength is a bit higher than the current setting of "anything, no matter how weak".
PrinceGaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 13-12-2015, 12:46
Stereo Steve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,376
Maybe they are assuming they will get their hand's on O2's 800 spectrum soon and will then move it up the order?
Stereo Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 13:02
domr1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1
I don't even seem to have 4G800 at all on my iPhone 6s with the carrier 23.1!
I have a home signal box and when I turn it off and go downstairs, I still get no service when according to the coverage checker I should be getting 'excellent' coverage by 4G800.

They just need to change the priority slightly so it switches at a very low 3G signal (1 bar or between -100 to -110 dBm instead of losing 3G and then switching to 4G800.

Although I am covered quite well by 3G2100 on 3 where I live which is fairly rural, 4G800 would still be nice to have as it can drop out occasionally or get a bit slow, and I would be able to turn off my home signal! Come on three!!
domr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 13:45
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,693
I put a 3 PAYG in my iPhone 6 yesterday to test at my mate's house in Fleet, Hants. The 4G 800 worked intermittently, as it kept picking up a sliver of 3G (which is unusable for calls and ends up always dropping) in preference.

When the phone stayed on the 4G 800 the VoLTE worked well and calling the top up line was instant and quality crisp.

Very obvious the priority is wrong, or they need to reduce the transmit power of the 3G/2100 a tiny amount.
Yeah as has been said that would fix the problem in that location but the issue would just move inwards towards the mast.

What they actually need to do (and don't really know why they haven't) is to have an idle mode handover threshold.
So for example and idle device would switch to 800 at, say, -100dBm on 3G.
Then it would switch back to 3G when the 3G signal was say, -90.
I think they are worried that would mean an awful lot more device on 800 more of the time and it couldn't cope.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 14:43
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,389
Yeah as has been said that would fix the problem in that location but the issue would just move inwards towards the mast.

What they actually need to do (and don't really know why they haven't) is to have an idle mode handover threshold.
So for example and idle device would switch to 800 at, say, -100dBm on 3G.
Then it would switch back to 3G when the 3G signal was say, -90.
I think they are worried that would mean an awful lot more device on 800 more of the time and it couldn't cope.
Yes, they are really stuck. As it is, my mate wouldn't consider switching to Three as it was still as unlikely to make successful calls as on EE's 3G. However EE's WiFi Calling is the killer feature and means his phone works great in his place.

So "Super-Voice" or "Super-Pumped" is a bit of a misnomer.... and the coverage map is LOL.
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 15:10
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
Yes, one thing came to light with WiFi calling.
That is how much better phone signals really need to be. The allnround situation often sounds quite dire.

I am switching to 3 in the New Year. Though I have no idea if I will have 4G, I do know the 3G signal is impressive and so will be quite happy with that if there is no 4G.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 15:26
Skippy2005
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 731
Yeah as has been said that would fix the problem in that location but the issue would just move inwards towards the mast.

What they actually need to do (and don't really know why they haven't) is to have an idle mode handover threshold.
So for example and idle device would switch to 800 at, say, -100dBm on 3G.
Then it would switch back to 3G when the 3G signal was say, -90.
I think they are worried that would mean an awful lot more device on 800 more of the time and it couldn't cope.
But surely It would cope nicely if they enabled it on every site and gave it the same priority as 3G if it has about the same capacity as DC HSPDA, then that would double the capacity 3's network has? Or is it not as simple as that? And use 4G1800 solely as data?
Skippy2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 15:46
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,693
But surely It would cope nicely if they enabled it on every site and gave it the same priority as 3G if it has about the same capacity as DC HSPDA, then that would double the capacity 3's network has? Or is it not as simple as that? And use 4G1800 solely as data?
No not as simple as that.
It can't have the same priority. It has to be higher (which they can't do as they have loads of 800 masts with no 1800), or lower.
Also it's not going to be on every site.
EE have 18000+ sites and have stated they are doing 3800+ sites with 800.
It wouldn't make sense to do all of them. Lots don't need it.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 16:04
tghe-retford
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Retford
Posts: 20,453
4G 1800MHz has been spotted in Retford, although from my investigations, only the mast in the centre of Retford has it switched on.

And now that 4G has come to my town, I await the inevitable 30 day notice that'll soon arrive because Murphy's Law is like that.
tghe-retford is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 16:40
Skippy2005
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 731
No not as simple as that.
It can't have the same priority. It has to be higher (which they can't do as they have loads of 800 masts with no 1800), or lower.
Also it's not going to be on every site.
EE have 18000+ sites and have stated they are doing 3800+ sites with 800.
It wouldn't make sense to do all of them. Lots don't need it.
Ok wishful tanking then, do 3 plan to have 18000 masts too both 3G2100/4G1800? Does anyone know how many 4G800 sites they plan to have. Assuming 3 don't get o2.
Skippy2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 17:05
Gigabit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,876
I am switching to 3 in the New Year. Though I have no idea if I will have 4G, I do know the 3G signal is impressive and so will be quite happy with that if there is no 4G.
No doubt you will hate it and then praise O2 again...
Gigabit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 17:18
mupet0000
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 620
Three doesn't understand the meaning of the word Excellent. It looks like my town has got just the one mast with 800, yet the coverage checker shows blanket coverage almost everywhere with a bigger footprint than 3G.

It's simply not true, I haven't found a single place where I now get service where I was unable to before. Downstairs in my house I get awful 3G, when I first got the update the iPhone stuck on 4G800 and it was much better, but after some VoLTE testing it went back to 3G and I haven't been on 800 since.

I've tried 3 locations that I know of where the coverage checker shows Excellent indoor 4G Super-Voice coverage, yet I get no service at all. Nothing has changed.

It may look good on a coverage map but in reality it is absolutely no where near anything shown. And it's clearly showing 800+1800 coverage on the map which makes no sense as the two bands don't operate together or handoff to each other.
mupet0000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 17:25
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,693
Ooops, wrong thread....
Deleted!
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 17:34
Skippy2005
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 731
Ok wishful tanking then, do 3 plan to have 18000 masts too both 3G2100/4G1800? Does anyone know how many 4G800 sites they plan to have. Assuming 3 don't get o2.
DevonBloke you must know the answer
Skippy2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 18:06
hatton920
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
The only place I've seen any change is at my girlfriends on the outskirts of sleaford Nottingham. Normally I'm on 1 bar of 3G or no signal and now I get 1 bar of 4g. But often I've took my phone out of my pocket and it's no signal then maybe a minute later I get 1 bar of 4g 800. And this is in a area where three say excellent 3G and no 4g.

I've also tried at my dads who has a signal box and once the signal box is turned off I just lose signal altogether and get nothing till the signal box is turned on.
hatton920 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 18:31
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,693
DevonBloke you must know the answer
Sorry, I don't.
I was hoping someone else might!
I don't think Three have released any information about it.
EE did the other day stating "more than 3800".

I take this to mean at least 3800 identified masts but there may be more when the coverage is tested.

EE and Three are sharing the tri-band antennas on masts. Whether that's all of them or some of them and who decides what I don't know.

Hoping someone might!
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 19:00
GavinAshford
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 229
They're not sharing all 800 antennas it seems, or at least according to this planning application for MBNL near Hull.

http://gdurl.com/L3Sa

From:
https://newplanningaccess.eastriding.gov.uk/
15/03735/TELCOM

Edit: I read Devons post as EE/3 sharing the 800 frequency, hence the above comment, having reread though I don't think he meant that.
GavinAshford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 19:19
Pedro_C
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 660
They're not sharing all 800 antennas it seems, or at least according to this planning application for MBNL near Hull.

http://gdurl.com/L3Sa

From:
https://newplanningaccess.eastriding.gov.uk/
15/03735/TELCOM

Edit: I read Devons post as EE/3 sharing the 800 frequency, hence the above comment, having reread though I don't think he meant that.
That doesn't mean that EE can't come along later and deplo 800 using the 800 antenna though.
Pedro_C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 20:07
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,693
They're not sharing all 800 antennas it seems, or at least according to this planning application for MBNL near Hull.

http://gdurl.com/L3Sa

From:
https://newplanningaccess.eastriding.gov.uk/
15/03735/TELCOM

Edit: I read Devons post as EE/3 sharing the 800 frequency, hence the above comment, having reread though I don't think he meant that.
Yeah I meant sharing the physical antenna panels.
Thing is as Pedro says there is nothing stopping EE coming back and linking across to the 800 feed in exactly the same way as you can see in that diagram that Three are linking back across to EE's side to the 1800 antenna. https://www.dropbox.com/s/73ol4cvucq...-1800.JPG?dl=0
Bookey said the same.
Thing is Three are on this manic 800 rush to roll out 800 that no one can use. Hahaha
EE are more concentrating on the base 1800 rollout and doing the 800 as they go afterwards.
Those are just initial plans showing initial connections.
EE could and probably will come back afterwards and link theirs in.
Hell it's probably them paying most of the cost of antennas.
I can't see EE not having 800 wherever Three have it.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 20:13
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,693
Actually if I was running the EE rollout I would make damn sure that wherever Three had the 800 hooked up, so would EE.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 20:20
lightspeed2398
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,303
Actually if I was running the EE rollout I would make damn sure that wherever Three had the 800 hooked up, so would EE.
How much extra would it cost them, considering they would already have the base station and backhaul? And considering that would in the short term fill the gap caused by restricting 1800 power I suppose it would act as the fill in until they can 2G CSFB.
lightspeed2398 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 20:30
DevonBloke
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Totnes, Devon
Posts: 6,693
How much extra would it cost them, considering they would already have the base station and backhaul? And considering that would in the short term fill the gap caused by restricting 1800 power I suppose it would act as the fill in until they can 2G CSFB.
I just think EE could always stay ahead of Three (coverage wise) by making sure all Three 800 sites were also EE sites. not that staying ahead of Three is particularly difficult at the mo. But then that's Three's fault.
DevonBloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 20:38
Denco1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 983
Ok wishful tanking then, do 3 plan to have 18000 masts too both 3G2100/4G1800? Does anyone know how many 4G800 sites they plan to have. Assuming 3 don't get o2.
Goodness no 3 aren't planning to have 18000 4G1800 masts Would cost Hutchinson far too much

I think jabbamk1 stated the revised plan was about 70% population coverage under 1800MHz? I'd guess they don't plan on over 5000 4G1800MHz sites.
Denco1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 20:43
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,546
Three isn't aiming at the same market as EE, it is designed to be lower cost, more for your money but for the lower cost you get less coverage and lower speeds.

I'm perfectly happy as anything over 6 Mb/s allows you to do everything you want really, I'd much rather have the unlimited which you can't get on EE and the lower pricing.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-12-2015, 20:45
Denco1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 983
Actually if I was running the EE rollout I would make damn sure that wherever Three had the 800 hooked up, so would EE.
I think EE might actually match Three even if they didn't do all the masts Three have 800MHz at.
In Manchester Three seem to have avoided quite a good few site locations. I'm unsure if it is landlord problems or not as these sites because they also have EE 2600MHz but no Three 4G. If EE add 800MHz to the better locations Three aren't present at they could easily beat Three coverage wise without needing to 800MHz every site Three are already at.
Denco1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:26.