DS Forums

 
 

Quadruple Eviction (2010) vs Quadruple Eviction (2015)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30-05-2015, 15:05
tullochs
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 908

Which 1 did you like more? Which will be remembered in years to come?
tullochs is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 30-05-2015, 15:09
DUNDEEBOY
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,295
2010 as it was near the end.

The idea of it was to remove Josies competition for the win
DUNDEEBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2015, 15:46
BeeBumble
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,624
They both made the mistake of making it vote to evict! I'd say I prefer this one because I don't think any of them we're a major loss to the show. Where's John James, Sam Pepper and Corin were all big charecters and it made for a very predictable and boring final week.
BeeBumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-2015, 15:49
hellomoto977
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 561
My favourite (John James) went out in the 2010 one, so I think I prefer this one as I wasn't too bothered about the ones that left. (Still dislike the new housemates though.)!
hellomoto977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 01:24
starry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,011
This was far worse, as it kills off the cast at the start.
starry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 01:34
Robbo19
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 292
BB11 quadruple eviction was so much better as it was the semi final night. Didn't agree with the evictees but at least they were all fairly nominated.

The BB16 one was horrible and unfair to those who left. Harriet was evicted without getting one nomination.
Robbo19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 02:05
starry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,011
Yeh to have one evicted without being up by nominations is strange, but to have 4 is just lunacy. And BB depends on us accepting the rules as we are meant to be engaged by those in the house. Blow the rules up and are you left with any audience? The rules change according to who the producers want in.
starry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 09:56
Lola_Rae_Perry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 355
The latter was much better. I frown upon bb11 solely for the that eviction. It was awful. I was fine when Steve? Was it got voted out. But then after Corin and Sam were evicted I gave up and only watched the final, through gritted teeth I might add. I couldn't stand Josie! But I had to watch the final because I thought it would be the last civilian series we'd ever see.

At least with the 2015 one we lost good people but we gained others who for some quickly made us forget they had been evicted.
Lola_Rae_Perry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 10:41
starry
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,011
'us forget'
what???

The whole thing was a joke. Apart from Kieren all the evictions were predictable and so boring, it got rid of people who brought drama to the house.

And the return of Simon was ridiculous. He's brought in and does a stupid timebomb saying 'safe'. Makes no sense, they meant he was returned and not 'safe'. And he obviously knew being back in the house that he was returning so it was just more chance for him to act up again. And the way people were evicted, in pairs at first (always stupid) and like it was by the back door was absolutely stupid as well.
starry is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:32.