Originally Posted by Tt88:
“I can't see what there is to argue about!
To me a magician has one job, and that is to make the impossible seem possible. It doesn't matter if they are performing a trick that costs £20, or a big illusion that runs into thousands of pounds. Nor does it matter if variations of the trick has been done before.
Nobody is seriously suggesting that Jamie Raven should have been able to get the note into the lemon without touching the box, or the inner box, or the bag or even the lemon.
The fact is that when you watched the trick, you could see him fumbling with whatever was in the bag so the trick wasn't flawless. For that, you can make your own conclusions as to how the note got into the lemon.
I don't think thats enough to critise him, as performing on BGT is probably a big deal so he was bound to be nervous. But did he deserve to win on the basis of the trick he performed? Probably not.”
Exactly!
Now I have my suspicions about Jamie based on info Ive seen amongst magicians,BGT had a magic advisor called Russ Stevens who coached Jamie (badly IMO) whether he was sourced to get a magician on the show I dunno.
I thought the whole routine in the final was good,it referenced his first audition with drawing on the card in his pocket and BGT bank note.. Apology to Alesha nice way to introduce nest of boxes,and bill switch to instructions on paper nice way to lead into lemon.
There are better versions of bill to lemon and his was only spoilt by bad camera angles but unless its your own show you cant control that, a wrist move would have prevented hole being seen but pressure of live TV makes you forget things that would normally be second nature.
Lets be honest how much of the votes were for his act and how many for his looks?