|
||||||||
Were you happy with the winner ? |
| View Poll Results: Were you happy with the winner | |||
| Yes |
|
150 | 65.22% |
| No |
|
58 | 25.22% |
| Don't care |
|
16 | 6.96% |
| Hated it, i'm going to sulk about it for a very long time and never watch the show again. |
|
6 | 2.61% |
| Voters: 230. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in? | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,530
|
Very happy!
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,530
|
Yes, really deserved it.
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
Isaac Waddington should have come second instead of Jamie Raven, but I thought the winner was the right choice. Best act on the night, and far, far superior to Ashleigh and Pudsey. As Amanda Holden said, Jules and Matisse blew all the other dog acts out of the water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 561
|
Well deserved, very happy!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,996
|
Quote:
Yes. My second favourite act won and third favourite came second. UDI coming below the family singers and kung fu girl was a bit baffling but no complaints overall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,856
|
Pathetic. They should have a separate show for animals. I dont watch it but for an effing dog to win, the humans must've been pretty shameful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,526
|
Not at all. Seems that all you have to do to be £250k better off is get to the rescue centre, get a disabled pet and use said pet as the trump card and voilà - fame and fortune
Feel very sorry for the talented people who lost out to an animal |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
Pathetic. They should have a separate show for animals. I dont watch it but for an effing dog to win, the humans must've been pretty shameful.
That dog had more talent than most of the acts. TOP 3 was spot on... you could say have a separate show for singer's. ..oh wait a minute |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,579
|
Quote:
Not at all. Seems that all you have to do to be £250k better off is get to the rescue centre, get a disabled pet and use said pet as the trump card and voilà - fame and fortune
Feel very sorry for the talented people who lost out to an animal |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,425
|
deserved what.... bullying a lovely dog until it walked on its hind legs.. I thought this act was outmoded back in the days of Lassie movies.. criminal and cruel.. she should be ashamed of herself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
I'm extremely disappointed. The magician or the choir that came 3rd ought to have won.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
Yes, absolutely delighted with the winner, first time I've ever actually bothered to vote for anyone in it. Matisse is amazing, and Jules is an extremly talented excellent trainer, it takes a lot of work to get a dog to do what Matisse can, and not every dog could either. As for Skippy being for sympathy votes, that's rubbish, he was part of the act, Matisse's character was only stealing sausages to help a less fortunate dog. The act wouldn't have worked with another four legged dog as it would be able to get them itself, whereas a three legged dog is obviously less able. Very very worthy winners
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,425
|
Quote:
I agree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,030
|
A gimlet eyed psychopath and that was just the dog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,973
|
Quote:
They are good at what they do, but I did want something more original to win instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 187
|
yes.
the dog rocks. haters can eat their sour grapes the magician sucked balls. his act was SO contrived. the choir should have came second. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,579
|
Quote:
yes.
the dog rocks. haters can eat their sour grapes the magician sucked balls. his act was SO contrived. the choir should have came second. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,425
|
http://stopanimalabuse.blogspot.co.u...forced-to.html abuse , the act was not clever but bullying a dog in every sense of the word.. how the hell could anyone have voted for this
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,339
|
Quote:
Isaac Waddington should have come second instead of Jamie Raven, but I thought the winner was the right choice. Best act on the night, and far, far superior to Ashleigh and Pudsey. As Amanda Holden said, Jules and Matisse blew all the other dog acts out of the water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 187
|
too many haters on this board, just saying.
other than one more, none of the other acts stood out for me tonight. all the dance acts were run of the mill. one singer choked, the others were standard. the little girl had barely any time to prepare so can't blame her. the magician was so contrived. the neales were holding themselves back. the impersonator wasnt that good. the choir was good and was the only other standout. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
http://stopanimalabuse.blogspot.co.u...forced-to.html abuse , the act was not clever but bullying a dog in every sense of the word.. how the hell could anyone have voted for this
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kent but ex Sarf London
Posts: 26,526
|
Quote:
too many haters on this board, just saying.
other than one more, none of the other acts stood out for me tonight. all the dance acts were run of the mill. one singer choked, the others were standard. the little girl had barely any time to prepare so can't blame her. the magician was so contrived. the neales were holding themselves back. the impersonator wasnt that good. the choir was good and was the only other standout. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,295
|
I've just finished throwing a hissy fit. I will still watch next year though.
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,425
|
Quote:
Zzzzzz.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
does that mean your too tired to be bothered with animal cruelty..
I read that article and whilst it is disgusting what that person was doing, it wasn't about Jules & Matisse. There's nothing to suggest Jules does any of that to her dogs. |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40.





