|
||||||||
UDI are not really Attraction are they |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 30,268
|
UDI are not really Attraction are they
I thought they had a chance of winning but maybe they were trying to hard to be Attraction What do you guys think
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,191
|
They needed to change it up a bit more, it was too similar to their previous routines so fell flat
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
I thought they were great but their chances were scuppered IMO by Jules & Matisse coming from nowhere and delivering a fantastic performance.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,987
|
It's unfair to compare them to Attraction.
It's completely different |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Docklands, London
Posts: 2,255
|
1) their performance was similar to previous ones
2) the narrative to their performance wasn't great compared to attraction.. and.. . 3) I know some will disagree with me, but I really didn't want an act from another country, who can't even speak English, win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,413
|
Screwed over by the very early performance slot and Jules and Matisse being flawless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,746
|
I like the idea, but their stories aren't very good.
The story seems to be good man against bad man, and they fight each other with birds and some mask faces make an appearance for some reason. Rinse and repeat. Not much of a story. At points I'm also trying to work out what is actually going on. For example I don't understand what the mask faces are all about and what they are actually doing when they appear. I think they could be very good in the future when they polish things up a bit. They look to have potential but at the moment they feel like an unfinished work in progress act at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Devon
Posts: 988
|
It also doesn't help when you can see their hands when lifting each other. IMO they need better costume and set design along with more clarity in story telling, variety in routine themes and tighter choreography to deliver a routine with finesse.
Attraction were the finished product from the first audition. No comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 27,583
|
Quote:
I like the idea, but their stories aren't very good.
The story seems to be good man against bad man, and they fight each other with birds and some mask faces make an appearance for some reason. Rinse and repeat. Not much of a story. At points I'm also trying to work out what is actually going on. For example I don't understand what the mask faces are all about and what they are actually doing when they appear. I think they could be very good in the future when they polish things up a bit. They look to have potential but at the moment they feel like an unfinished work in progress act at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,746
|
Quote:
It also doesn't help when you can see their hands when lifting each other. IMO they need better costume and set design along with more clarity in story telling, variety in routine themes and tighter choreography to deliver a routine with finesse.
Attraction were the finished product from the first audition. No comparison. I wish them all the best and I think they can improve significantly once they provide stories which resonate with the watcher and work on communicating those stories with more focus and clarity on key elements within the story. For example there were pauses where everything was a bit 'floaty', for lack of a better description, where nothing was happening and felt like too much time was being spent on not saying anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,006
|
I agree with all the criticisms here, but I also think they were the most interesting act we had on this year, so its a bit of a difficult one for me. I think I'd prefer something different and at least reasonably original that isn't the finished article over the same old stuff that fills every final as it has became the same acts, different people.
Its a shame they didn't get more support, they should have been much higher in the rankings. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,746
|
Quote:
I agree with all the criticisms here, but I also think they were the most interesting act we had on this year, so its a bit of a difficult one for me. I think I'd prefer something different and at least reasonably original that isn't the finished article over the same old stuff that fills every final as it has became the same acts, different people.
Its a shame they didn't get more support, they should have been much higher in the rankings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,019
|
I didn't want the winners of BGT to be foreign spending the winnings on charities in their own country. We wouldn't see a single penny of that money being spent in this country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Sees me at the tower
Posts: 1,669
|
Nope, Attraction could only dream of being as good as UDI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 2,987
|
Quote:
Nope, Attraction could only dream of being as good as UDI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,122
|
I think as most posters have already said attraction were far better storytellers and looked the finished article . Most people thought attraction would win the moment they saw them , but I never got that feeling with UDI
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Sees me at the tower
Posts: 1,669
|
Quote:
They are completely different acts, so don't compare them
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.


