I dont know why everyones going crazy
she trained all 3 dogs thats harder than just one
she used her other dog because matisse doesnt like hieghts
and the story wouldnt of made sense if shed said at the beginning or at the end
but if they was hiding anything she wouldnt of admitted it the next day
at the end of the day her other dog done the high ropes and deserves to win its not like she had a robot or anything
yes she could of said she had 3 dogs at the time but simon cowel probably told her not tosay anything because the story of the pperformance wouldnt of made sense

I would of preferred her to started the whole show with all 3 dogs all the way through but she still deserved to win either way the performances were spot on and no way would I have wanted the magician to win he was crap

The talent is the training not the specific dog, so really this made no difference.

Also, it's darn sure that the show is the only who made her feature Matisse as the "star" of the act, leading to that backfiring when Matisse wasn't the performer, whereas I bet on her own she would have marketed herself as the star.

Agreed. It's no different to a stunt actor in a film. I know I won't complain when I go see Jurassic World, for example, and there's inevitably a stunt double running away from the Indominus Rex instead of Chris Pratt.

we don't need another thread.