|
||||||||
Even the Sun front page attacking Jules and Matisse now |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Why did she not come clean when And and Dec asked her about Matisses training for the tightrope?
It wouldn't have 'spoilt the narrative' after the event ![]() |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
I actually think it's wrong that she used the other dog to do the MAIN part of the act. To get that other dog to do the main trick and not tell us until now is deceitful.
The act is called Jules and Matisse, i expect Matisse to do the most important parts of the act. If she was going to use other dogs then the act should be call Jules and her dogs. I think this act winning when the main dog isn't even performing the tricks is wrong to be honest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
If you'd ever seen the form you have to fill in when you get to that stage, you'd actually see that YOU are asked to fill in the name of your act. Nothing to do with being told what to do.
Do you remember the year the woman went on with two dogs? Her act was called Donellda Guy (I think that's her name). No mention of the dogs. Why didn't Jules just use HER name as it was really her show anyway? Quote:
We thought about calling the act Jules and Mattise and friends, but got dubbed Jules and Matisse.
Got dubbed by who?The producers of course. |
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
Got dubbed by who?
The producers of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
I actually think it's wrong that she used the other dog to do the MAIN part of the act. To get that other dog to do the main trick and not tell us until now is deceitful.
The act is called Jules and Matisse, i expect the Matisse to do the most important parts of the act. If she was going to use other dogs then the act should be call Jules and her dogs. I think this act winning when the main dog isn't even performing the tricks is wrong to be honest. And besides, she's said she wanted to call it Jules & Mattise And Friends but was called Jules & Matisse instead. |
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
No they voted for Matisse not the stunt dog. Why did they not come clean about it instead of being deceitful?
I wouldn't call chase a stunt dog either he was just obviously better suited for that part of the act It's a shame the act wasn't called jules Matisse and friends and had all 3 dogs on stage during the placements as she has trained them all and they were all brilliant |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
How did you know, the act was called Jules and Matisse, and he was the only one used in the first round, so why should we believe he was not the only one used again. If both dogs had been in all the rounds that have been different.
Same with the act called Michael Late which also involved a load of other people, and again a double, as well as his 'half sister'. The act name is not a full run down of who's involved, it's usually just the key people/leads |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
I actually think it's wrong that she used the other dog to do the MAIN part of the act. To get that other dog to do the main trick and not tell us until now is deceitful.
The act is called Jules and Matisse, i expect the Matisse to do the most important parts of the act. If she was going to use other dogs then the act should be call Jules and her dogs. I think this act winning when the main dog isn't even performing the tricks is wrong to be honest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Would you expect a magician who uses a double or hands to name them in their act name?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
Maybe not, but she tricked us but bringing on the other dog in the semi, but not in the final and gave the impression it was only a 'one trick' dog,
![]() All of what she does are tricks anyway, the act is (IMO) very similar to a magician. It's all about deception and illusion. I mean, Matisse wasn't really stealing sausages for a three legged dog, she wasn't really hiding in a bin or puling clothes off things, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,280
|
Quote:
Good hopefully she will have to give her prize money back or donate it to an animal charity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 19,601
|
Quote:
Would you expect a magician who uses a double or hands to name them in their act name?
What makes this even more dodgy is that there was no sign of a third dog at the end of the act. We saw 2 dogs, there was no sign of the third dog, why hide the other dog if this is all innocent ? The only reason why the dog was hidden is because she intended to deceive the audience. I have no idea why she would reveal this though, she can't be very bright. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 977
|
There's a very nasty tone here, and some very unsavoury reactions to those who feel that this act, whilst not earth shattrering or important news in the big scheme of things, mislead the public. How dare someone be called 'stupid' because they have a genuine and understandable gripe. There's also some very odd, and totally unrelated anologies used to suggest why this is all ok and above board. I for one, think that there was a fair amount of missleading going on, wether or not it would have made the overall voting I'm not sure, but there should be no room for error given ITV's track record here.
Also it seems, many think that we should all have known that this was stand-in dog, as apparently it was seen and name-checked in an earlier round. However, there are many like myself who are not as obsessed with watching every minute of this show and only tuned in for the final. I wonder how many votes were cast by those that thought there would be no stand-in dogs used and they were voting for the talent of not only the trainer but the dog that was specifically named in the act. This would all have been no problem if the act was called 'Jules & her dogs' or something equally ambiguous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
There's a very nasty tone here, and some very unsavoury reactions to those who feel that this act, whilst not earth shattrering or important news in the big scheme of things, mislead the public. How dare someone be called 'stupid' because they have a genuine and understandable gripe. There's also some very odd, and totally unrelated anologies used to suggest why this is all ok and above board. I for one, think that there was a fair amount of missleading going on, wether or not it would have made the overall voting I'm not sure, but there should be no room for error given ITV's track record here.
Also it seems, many think that we should all have known that this was stand-in dog, as apparently it was seen and name-checked in an earlier round. However, there are many like myself who are not as obsessed with watching every minute of this show and only tuned in for the final. I wonder how many votes were cast by those that thought there would be no stand-in dogs used and they were voting for the talent of not only the trainer but the dog that was specifically named in the act. This would all have been no problem if the act was called 'Jules & her dogs' or something equally ambiguous. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
This would all have been no problem if the act was called 'Jules & her dogs' or something equally ambiguous.
I mean it's like people suddenly have lost all knowledge of how Simon Cowell and his co-producers operate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
There's a very nasty tone here, and some very unsavoury reactions to those who feel that this act, whilst not earth shattrering or important news in the big scheme of things, mislead the public. How dare someone be called 'stupid' because they have a genuine and understandable gripe. There's also some very odd, and totally unrelated anologies used to suggest why this is all ok and above board. I for one, think that there was a fair amount of missleading going on, wether or not it would have made the overall voting I'm not sure, but there should be no room for error given ITV's track record here.
Also it seems, many think that we should all have known that this was stand-in dog, as apparently it was seen and name-checked in an earlier round. However, there are many like myself who are not as obsessed with watching every minute of this show and only tuned in for the final. I wonder how many votes were cast by those that thought there would be no stand-in dogs used and they were voting for the talent of not only the trainer but the dog that was specifically named in the act. This would all have been no problem if the act was called 'Jules & her dogs' or something equally ambiguous. |
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
That's your fault then for not being loyal to the show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
So being loyal to the show means always turning things around so that the contestants are to blame and never the producers?
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 977
|
Quote:
That's your fault then for not being loyal to the show.
you've made some strange comments on this thread, but this is priceless
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
I hope so too, I didn't like the woman and the dog's tricks in the audition, I wonder if they are completely trained with love and affection or with a bit of fear as well. I would like to see the RSPCA conduct an investigation into her training methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
you've made some strange comments on this thread, but this is priceless |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,746
|
Quote:
Surely circus acts or music hall acts like this are old hat and if not banned should have been long ago...
There's a reason why we don't normally see animal acts in circuses any more. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 11,807
|
Quote:
How did you know, the act was called Jules and Matisse, and he was the only one used in the first round, so why should we believe he was not the only one used again. If both dogs had been in all the rounds that have been different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 11,807
|
If someone can show me a clip of Jules saying anything like "when Matisse walked the tightrope", showing that she blatantly lied, then I might feel differently. But as far as I'm concerned, no deliberate misleading went on and I still would've voted for them if she had said that Chase was the one who performed on the tightrope.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,280
|
Quote:
She actually worked/works for the RSPCA herself and trains guidedogs
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17.






but this is priceless