|
||||||||
This fake winner needs to be stripped of her win |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
This fake winner needs to be stripped of her win
Using a fake dog and not telling the public, she was a cheat and needs to be stripped of the title and everyone who voted have the money refunded.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
No, no and no, the dog wasn't fake, I saw it move, breathe and everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,425
|
Quote:
Using a fake dog and not telling the public, she was a cheat and needs to be stripped of the title and everyone who voted have the money refunded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
It isn't 'cruel' the dogs are very well looked after and enjoy what they do, any womble can see that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
No no no no no no no.
No. Anyone who paid to vote should realise it was their own fault anyway because you can have five free votes on the app; you don't need to pay. And why should she be stripped of her win over a non-issue? It's like going to see a Oscar-winning movie and demanding it's stripped of its Oscar because there was a stunt double in it. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
No no no no no no no.
No. Anyone who paid to vote should realise it was their own fault anyway because you can have five free votes on the app; you don't need to pay. And why should she be stripped of her win over a non-issue? It's like going to see a Oscar-winning movie and demanding it's stripped of its Oscar because there was a stunt double in it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Magherafelt, Co. Derry
Posts: 20,508
|
Oh hi again, you're the one who made the thread about Matisse being cruelly forced to walk a tightrope aren't you? This is why we need the roll eyes smiley back
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Great so I can now enter miming to a great singer and win, even without telling anyone.. Now where is the entry form!
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Kent
Posts: 16,077
|
You realise it was a real, living, breathing dog that walked the tightrope, don't you, OP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
You realise it was a real, living, breathing dog that walked the tightrope, don't you, OP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
yes but not the one everyone voted for...
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,424
|
Although the act is called "Jules and Matisse" we already knew that the performance in the final was an ensemble because the story wouldn't have worked without Skippy.
Therefore even though lots of people (myself included) hadn't twigged at the time that it was Chase who was walking the wire we'd already accepted that performers other than "Jules" and "Matisse" were part of the act. We already knew Chase exists because of the semis so it shouldn't be a massive shock at his reintroduction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 969
|
Oh get over it. Jules won, deal with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Yes it was. People voted for Chase as well as Matisse in the semi final. If some people thought Chase wouldn't be part of the final performance, then they're unbelievably thick and should probably audition for TOWIE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Why should they believe Chase was in the final, the dog was not in the first round. Only Matisse, so why would the public not believe it was only this dog again, if both were in all the rounds then yes your comment is right,,but that was not the case.
TOWIE is waiting for you, myscimitar... |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Because Chase was in the semi final and helped them get through to the final in the first place?
TOWIE is waiting for you, myscimitar... |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
the ones who voted for this appalling act dont deserve their money back... cruel old fashioned circus act..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 692
|
There was something of the night about Jules,didnt buy her smily smily act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Ok, be honest when you watched it, did you get it was Chase going across the ropes at the time!
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 56
|
It was incredibly deceitful to secretly use a second dog, and completely wrong to make a dog walk across a rope. How can Cowell call himself an animal lover but think that this circus act is acceptable?
It's almost like the country's talent barrel has been scraped completely dry, so anything goes... |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Planet Alan
Posts: 1,632
|
Quote:
There was something of the night about Jules,didnt buy her smily smily act.
As the human half of a dog act she was much less likeable than Ashleigh was when she won BGT. And, of course, Asheligh did it for the love of her dog without any thoughts initially of making money out of it all. Jules, on the other hand is old enough, and experienced enough in the animal training world, (where she earns her living anyway), to be fully motivated by the potential for extra income. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,968
|
Quote:
As the human half of a dog act she was much less likeable than Ashleigh was when she won BGT.
And, of course, Asheligh did it for the love of her dog without any thoughts initially of making money out of it all. Jules, on the other hand is old enough, and experienced enough in the animal training world, (where she earns her living anyway), to be fully motivated by the potential for extra income. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 22,156
|
Quote:
There was something of the night about Jules,didnt buy her smily smily act.
I really dislike immensely |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
It was incredibly deceitful to secretly use a second dog, and completely wrong to make a dog walk across a rope. How can Cowell call himself an animal lover but think that this circus act is acceptable?
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,424
|
Quote:
As the human half of a dog act she was much less likeable than Ashleigh was when she won BGT.
And, of course, Asheligh did it for the love of her dog without any thoughts initially of making money out of it all. Jules, on the other hand is old enough, and experienced enough in the animal training world, (where she earns her living anyway), to be fully motivated by the potential for extra income. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.



