Just re watched their performance on YouTube and spotted something else.

Amanda plugged her show give a pet a home. I bloody well hope she intends to pay for that advertising! It wasn't even during a commercial break!

Shameful!

There's a poster in another thread likening it to murder. Seriously.

You couldn't make it up could you.

Wow. What a shock. The sarcastic thread about Jules being metaphorically burned in effigy got deleted. Apparently the mods here didn't have the capacity to get that it wasn't talking about ACTUALLY burning her, but alluding to how in COUNTLESS other threads NOT deleted from here, people have gotten to that point pretty much.

Why is anyone surprised by this?

When I appeared on the show in 2009, Flawless were portrayed as this amateur bunch of guys when in fact they'd won the UK National Street Dance championships 4 years previously.

Or of course there was the kid in the same year, that performed a song that Simon stopped half way through and said 'that's all wrong for you, do you have any other songs'.

The kid then faltered and nervously said I could try another and smashed a Michael Jackson song out of the park. Only afterwards did we discover that he'd been touring the UK for the last six months in the theatre production of Thriller!

Hell the organisers wrote to me and asked if I would go on the show even though I told them that what I did wasn't a talent. Nothing, or at the best very little, in that show is actually genuine.

World War II isn't in it with this. Stiff upper lip. Remember, there will always be an England.

Ah... be cafeful with that sarcasm. It got that other thread I was talking about deleted! Apparently you can rave all you want about how bad Jules is, but if you mock people raving about Jules, that's the line!

They are still doing the 'have you got another song routine'. Don't they realise we've all twigged? Or do they just think we are all very very stupid

I got a warning the other day because I told someone to bore off.

You can call someone a liar, animal abuser, fraudster and god knows what else Jules has been called on these forums but try a little sarcasm or tell someone to bore off and you get your knuckles wrapped.

The thread wasn't even doing that. It didn't refer to any poster, either directly OR indirectly. No names, no quotes, no NOTHING anyone had actually posted. It just mocked the whole hue and cry where people are acting like she's some kind of great social problem by going even more over the top than them (comparing her to Hitler, etc.) The parody element of it couldn't have been clearer.

I know the thread. I posted in it a few times ( I am scared to mention animatronic dogs lest this thread gets deleted too).

Maybe we should stick to throwing around slanderous comments about Jules and insulting her genuinely. Apparently that's absolutely fine.

Jerefprdterra, myscimitar and Old Endeavour probably all clubbed together (that's if they're not actually the same person) and threatened to sue Digital Spy, its moderators, and it's moderator's families

Yep. I think Jules has a case against several posters, particularly the one who suggested people come in and throw things at her on the BGT tour.

Good lord, that really happened?

I thought I was going over the top "suggesting" burning in effigy. But I assumed we were just parodying endless verbal threats and some really lame legal suggestions. If people were actually suggesting assault (you don't have to directly touch someone for it to be assault)? Amazing. And sick.

In 'Showbiz' there was a hilarious thread about Peter Andre and Here to Help.

It was removed too.

Really?

How moronic.

I'd also suggest she had a pretty strong case against those who labeled her an animal abuser, liar, fraudster and liked her 'deception' to committing murder (and no I'm not making that up).

I'd say there's more than a few posters who are very lucky Jules doesn't read DS.

As I've said previously though, I'd personally find it absolutely hysterical if she somehow (or her agent if she has one) did stumble across the posts and decide to take every poster throwing insults and libellous comments her way to the cleaners.

Thing is this.
Individual posters are not accountable but DS is, which kinda explains the removal of posts/threads.

There are plenty of posts still up that are calling Jules all sorts. Comments over quite a few threads.

Just look at the first post in this thread. Jules is called a cheat and accused of using a 'fake' dog.

LOOL. Don't imagine "Chase" OR "Matisse" would take kindly to being called a fake dog.

You'd be mistaken. In Libel law the person making the statement is legally responsible for what they say. DS would be required to hand over the person's email address. This is the reason why in the past, DS wouldn't allow people to sign up with webmail email addresses unless they paid a fee.

Pretty much ALL of them in fact. All that got taken away was the one that mocked the people going over the top abusing her.

I stand corrected then.

Considering how many people fall for it year after year after year and still pick up their phones to vote I think the answer is....

Yes they do.

Kerchingggggg!!!

But thats not the whole story, DS would also be responsible for publishing that libel.

In the print world, would you sure the journalist or the newspaper that distributed 1million copies of it?

Thanks.
That is exactly what I thought but I wasn't going to start on the subject.