This fake winner needs to be stripped of her win

15 of 15

Lyceum

17-06-2015

Originally Posted by TelevisionUser:
“To be fair though, quite a few people who voted that night do feel a bit annoyed by the non-disclosure aspect as illustrated by the comments that follow various newspaper articles although it's only a minority that makes what I would term extreme comments.”

Then they should have complained.

As it stands a beyond minute portion of voters complained.

myscimitar

18-06-2015

I wonder if after her Royal variety show, bet she bring both dogs out, unlike the fake win.

dellzincht

18-06-2015

She'll probably call the act what she originally wanted to at the Royal Variety so it won't matter.

Aww, bet you're gutted now.

Karis

18-06-2015

Originally Posted by unclekevo:
“Oh hi again, you're the one who made the thread about Matisse being cruelly forced to walk a tightrope aren't you? This is why we need the roll eyes smiley back”

Trust me. No emoticon needed. We're ALL doing it :P

myscimitar

19-06-2015

Originally Posted by Karis:
“Trust me. No emoticon needed. We're ALL doing it :P”

Not everyone, the thousands, who complained to Ofcom feel cheeted, and I hope this act gets ruled unfair.

Daewos

19-06-2015

Originally Posted by myscimitar:
“Not everyone, the thousand, who complained to Ofcom about BGT feel cheeted, and I hope this act gets ruled unfair.”

Corrected your errors. If you believe in justice I am sure you also believe in truth and would not deliberately overstste fo effect.

Lyceum

19-06-2015

Originally Posted by myscimitar:
“Not everyone, the thousands, who complained to Ofcom feel cheeted, and I hope this act gets ruled unfair.”

Would you like me to buy you a dictionary?

You don't seem to understand what the word fake means or the word thousands.

1150 complained to ofcom. 200 of those complained where about the judges dresses. Some were about Jamie's lemon.

Under 900 complained about Jules. That's not 'thousands'.

Ofcom didn't receive 'thousands' of complaints.

Happy to buy you that dictionary if it helps you grasp the words you keep incorrectly using.

Irma Bunt

30-06-2015

Originally Posted by myscimitar:
“Using a fake dog and not telling the public, she was a cheat and needs to be stripped of the title and everyone who voted have the money refunded.”

And the magician whom people voted for doesn't actually have magic powers. Was he scamming the public, too...?

The winning act - emphasis on the word act - used sleight of hand just as effectively as the magician, but it wasn't a con. The public was voting for the acts they liked best. The act with most votes won. End of.

Irma Bunt

30-06-2015

Originally Posted by Lyceum:
“Would you like me to buy you a dictionary?

You don't seem to understand what the word fake means or the word thousands.

1150 complained to ofcom. 200 of those complained where about the judges dresses. Some were about Jamie's lemon.

Under 900 complained about Jules. That's not 'thousands'.

Ofcom didn't receive 'thousands' of complaints.

Happy to buy you that dictionary if it helps you grasp the words you keep incorrectly using.”

Sadly, there are many on DS who don't let the facts get in the way of a rant...

Irma Bunt

30-06-2015

Originally Posted by Old Endeavour:
“Oh god not this nonsense again.

This is about VEIWERS being misled.
”

Tommyrot.

15 of 15