|
||||||||
This fake winner needs to be stripped of her win |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,125
|
I'm still not fully sure about this. In my view it was slightly ambiguous how she chose not to tell us after the act that Chase was also involved. However she did use Chase in the Semi's right? And it is her dog? So what is she actually guilty of here?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,783
|
Quote:
Using a fake dog and not telling the public, she was a cheat and needs to be stripped of the title and everyone who voted have the money refunded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
No but I wasn't too surprised when she said it was Chase a day later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
I'm still not fully sure about this. In my view it was slightly ambiguous how she chose not to tell us after the act that Chase was also involved. However she did use Chase in the Semi's right? And it is her dog? So what is she actually guilty of here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
Have to agree with the OP, and the final should take place again.
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
So that why some people are angry as they paid to vote on a single dog, that all I am saying!
You vote for the overall act, of which Chase is a part of. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 683
|
I think Jules was silly. She should have just said she had two dogs from the beginning. I think people would have still voted for her. She could have said that one of the dogs didn't do certain tricks as they might not be the suitable dog for it. Nobody could have faulted her as she knew the dogs best and would have just been playing to their abilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
So that why some people are angry as they paid to vote on a single dog, that all I am saying!
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
I didn't want her to win, but I don't think she should be stripped of the win. The only fair thing would be to ask everyone who voted for her if they want to retract their vote and see if the numbers go down enough to make Jamie the winner. Of course that is never going to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
You don't vote on a specific part of the act, such as a specific dog. That's like voting for a specific one member of the choir.
You vote for the overall act, of which Chase is a part of. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 683
|
Quote:
I didn't want her to win, but I don't think she should be stripped of the win. The only fair thing would be to ask everyone who voted for her if they want to retract their vote and see if the numbers go down enough to make Jamie the winner. Of course that is never going to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,078
|
She should be impeached.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
Quote:
I think people out of spite now would say they want to retract their vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
Using a fake dog and not telling the public, she was a cheat and needs to be stripped of the title and everyone who voted have the money refunded.
As usual, it's someone else being blamed for Syco's manipulations. Honestly, the biggest part of this that's a crock is not the whole dumb outrage over a contestant doing what they were told, but that frankly, as lovely as dogs are, they shouldn't have won 50% of the past 4 series. That's frankly absurd. Quote:
I think Jules was silly. She should have just said she had two dogs from the beginning. I think people would have still voted for her. She could have said that one of the dogs didn't do certain tricks as they might not be the suitable dog for it. Nobody could have faulted her as she knew the dogs best and would have just been playing to their abilities.
Syco tells pretty much every act how they're supposed to present themselves, and if they want to get on air, people do what they're told. Why would Syco do this? Because they were trying to recreate the marketing success they had with Ashleigh and Pudsey, and I bet anyone reading this, if they sit back and think about that for a moment, will know that's true. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Another time, another place..
Posts: 24,629
|
Quote:
As the human half of a dog act she was much less likeable than Ashleigh was when she won BGT.
And, of course, Asheligh did it for the love of her dog without any thoughts initially of making money out of it all. Jules, on the other hand is old enough, and experienced enough in the animal training world, (where she earns her living anyway), to be fully motivated by the potential for extra income. . Everybody and anybody who takes part in BGT is doing it with the hope of winning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
No one knew that. Even the act was called only Jules and Matisse. If it had been Jules and her dogs etc, then I sure no-one would have complained!
Again, people suddenly getting hung up on the act name. It's just a way to identify the acts, it's not a full billing of who's involved. Jamie Raven had helpers, Chloe Crawford had helpers and a double, Michael Late had helpers and a double, a lot of acts had backing dancers, Jesse Jane had her group of ninjas, etc. In all cases it was only the leads that were billed in the act name, same with Jules and Matisse. Furthermore, 'Jules & The dogs' wouldn't have made sense at the auditions when there was only one dog and would've spoiled the appearance of chase in the semi-finals. Further still, no one complained that it was called 'Jules & Matisse' in the semis when Chase was involved or even after the final when Skippy was involved either. The act name has only suddenly become an issue in the last 24 hours after the revelation of Chase's trick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
What do you mean no one knew that? Chase was in the semi-final alongside Matisse. He didn't appear out of nowhere.
Again, people suddenly getting hung up on the act name. It's just a way to identify the acts, it's not a full billing of who's involved. Jamie Raven had helpers, Chloe Crawford had helpers and a double, Michael Late had helpers and a double, a lot of acts had backing dancers, Jesse Jane had her group of ninjas, etc. In all cases it was only the leads that were billed in the act name, same with Jules and Matisse. Furthermore, 'Jules & The dogs' wouldn't have made sense at the auditions when there was only one dog and would've spoiled the appearance of chase in the semi-finals. Further still, no one complained that it was called 'Jules & Matisse' in the semis when Chase was involved or even after the final when Skippy was involved either. The act name has only suddenly become an issue in the last 24 hours after the revelation of Chase's trick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
So why was she not honest enough to mention chase after her act. She knew that would lose her votes!
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,038
|
Quote:
So why was she not honest enough to mention chase after her act. She knew that would lose her votes!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
So why was she not honest enough to mention chase after her act. She knew that would lose her votes!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Quote:
Have to agree with the OP, and the final should take place again.
You're boring people now *yawn* |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
Have to agree with the OP, and the final should take place again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,425
|
Quote:
It isn't 'cruel' the dogs are very well looked after and enjoy what they do, any womble can see that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Rubbish - jusr sour grapes
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Quote:
so Im a womble for caring about dogs being mistreated, you live in a fantasy ..
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34.





. Everybody and anybody who takes part in BGT is doing it with the hope of winning.