DS Forums

 
 

This fake winner needs to be stripped of her win


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2015, 15:58
callmediva
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,773
I doubt that very much.

If I was him I would be on the phone to a top lawyer as I'm typing this. Robbed of 250k under false pretence. Not funny.
but you don't KNOW, no matter how unlikely it is, it's still possible
callmediva is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 02-06-2015, 15:58
xTonix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
I doubt that very much.

If I was him I would be on the phone to a top lawyer as I'm typing this. Robbed of 250k under false pretence. Not funny.
Lmao, your so funny.
xTonix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 15:59
myscimitar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
Sorry if this is the level of things that makes you angry you have led a very charmed life and it sounds like you really do need to get out more.
So your happy she fooled the public to get 1/4 million pounds?
myscimitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 15:59
jerefprdterra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
Sorry have I missed something - Why cant she use two Dogs in her Act?
Because it was stated that the act was with one dog, and not with three.
jerefprdterra is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 15:59
JamieHT
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
Sorry have I missed something - Why cant she use two Dogs in her Act?
No one's saying that. It's the fact she didn't explicitly state that it was a different dog is what people are annoyed about.
JamieHT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:00
SteelEdge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,533
Why is there such anger over 2 dogs being used in a performance of an entertainment show?

All this outrage, you'd think the woman and dog had killed someone. Get over yourselves.
SteelEdge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:01
Sun Tzu.
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
Lmao, your so funny.
You can laugh Tonix, it wasn't you robbed of 250k under false pretence.
Sun Tzu. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:02
Sylvia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
There was something of the night about Jules,didnt buy her smily smily act.
Glad it's not just me. I was thinking the same from the first time I saw that woman.
Sylvia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:02
Dalekbuster523
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
It's actually not funny at all, you might have wanted her to win but it wasn't done fairly. That's the bottom line of it. When you have such a huge amount of money, it isn't funny, it's serious.

The magician could have done with that money and was robbed.
Put it this way: if Jamie Raven took it to Judge Rinder, he'd be laughed at and told to bog off (to put it politely).

Jules & Matisse won fairly. Chase was part of her act since the semi final. Jamie wasn't that good anyway; Darcy Oake was better.
Dalekbuster523 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:02
xTonix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
You can laugh Tonix, it wasn't you robbed of 250k under false pretence.
Oh dear you have to laugh at the sillyiness of what you say Jamie wasnt robbed!
xTonix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:03
Sylvia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
No one's saying that. It's the fact she didn't explicitly state that it was a different dog is what people are annoyed about.
Exactly.
Sylvia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:04
Dalekbuster523
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
Why this was cheating to get her hands on mega money,
Jamie Raven wouldn't have a leg to stand on because it wasn't HIS money and the public voted for Jules & Matisse. Jules & Matisse didn't cheat; Chase was part of their act since the semi final.
Dalekbuster523 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:04
callmediva
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,773
Put it this way: if Jamie Raven took it to Judge Rinder, he'd be laughed at and told to bog off (to put it politely).

Jules & Matisse won fairly. Chase was part of her act since the semi final. Jamie wasn't that good anyway; Darcy Oake was better.
she cheated, she used a stand in during the bike trick - I'm outraged
callmediva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:04
Sun Tzu.
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
Why is there such anger over 2 dogs being used in a performance of an entertainment show?

All this outrage, you'd think the woman and dog had killed someone. Get over yourselves.
250k is a laughing matter to you? Life changing money to many others. I'm struggling to see the funny side to this. The more I read about this the more I find it unbelievable.

The magician should not take that without looking to get compensated.
Sun Tzu. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:05
jerefprdterra
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
Just have a re run of the final without the cheat Jules, and we will have a fair winner.
jerefprdterra is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:06
Sylvia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
Oh dear you have to laugh at the sillyiness of what you say Jamie wasnt robbed!
He was, though, and so was the Welsh choir. If people had known the act wasn't what it seemed they could very well have voted differently.
Sylvia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:07
Sun Tzu.
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
Oh dear you have to laugh at the sillyiness of what you say Jamie wasnt robbed!
Don't know what you would call cheating then. No one voted for the actual final act because the mattise wasn't even performing. If it wasn't so ridiculous and serious, you would laugh.
Sun Tzu. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:07
myscimitar
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
She cheated the public to get 1/4 million pounds, so why is anyone defending her!
myscimitar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:08
Dalekbuster523
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
she cheated, she used a stand in during the bike trick - I'm outraged
Wrong magician. Darcy Oake was this guy:

http://cdn.itv.com/uploads/editor/me...ec3_ihtqIs.jpg
Dalekbuster523 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:09
Dalekbuster523
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
She cheated the public to get 1/4 million pounds, so why is anyone defending her!
Because she didn't cheat.
Dalekbuster523 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:10
Sun Tzu.
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
He was, though, and so was the Welsh choir. If people had known the act wasn't what it seemed they could very well have voted differently.
Exactly. It was won by 2.2 per cent I think. That is very close. She wouldn't have won it because it would have changed the narrative and people would not have been as touched by it.
Sun Tzu. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:10
eastiesfan2012
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 67
Jamie Raven wouldn't have a leg to stand on because it wasn't HIS money and the public voted for Jules & Matisse. Jules & Matisse didn't cheat; Chase was part of their act since the semi final.
But wasn't shown as part of their act in the final. He was hidden. Why? I don't know why you can't see that as being wrong.

In several interviews after, with Ant & Dec, Stephen Mulhern and on Good Morning Britain they referred to it and she didn't own up.
eastiesfan2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:10
xTonix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
As I said before, I voted for Jules and Matisse, I dont care if there was another dog walking on the rope, she didnt cheat me and I would vote for then all again.
xTonix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:10
skp20040
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,693
Sorry have I missed something - Why cant she use two Dogs in her Act?
Apparently because she did not tell us, and these days we all have to be outraged about everything, I assume it wont be long before there is a helpline for those watching traumatised by acts on BGT and X Factor who claim they can sing and cannot , and for those who realise magic is not magic but illusion , and of course compensation. I actually worry for peoples grasp on reality

Exactly. It was won by 2.2 per cent I think. That is very close. She wouldn't have won it because it would have changed the narrative and people would not have been as touched by it.
You think if people had known every fact of the act they would not have voted for her ?
skp20040 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2015, 16:10
Sylvia
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
Just have a re run of the final without the cheat Jules, and we will have a fair winner.
Hear! Hear! ( but sadly I don't see much chance of that happening.)

This is the worst thing since the Major and the coughing on Millionnaire.
Sylvia is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.