|
||||||||
This fake winner needs to be stripped of her win |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,773
|
Quote:
I doubt that very much.
If I was him I would be on the phone to a top lawyer as I'm typing this. Robbed of 250k under false pretence. Not funny. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
Quote:
I doubt that very much.
If I was him I would be on the phone to a top lawyer as I'm typing this. Robbed of 250k under false pretence. Not funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Sorry if this is the level of things that makes you angry you have led a very charmed life and it sounds like you really do need to get out more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
Quote:
Sorry have I missed something - Why cant she use two Dogs in her Act?
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
Quote:
Sorry have I missed something - Why cant she use two Dogs in her Act?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,533
|
Why is there such anger over 2 dogs being used in a performance of an entertainment show?
All this outrage, you'd think the woman and dog had killed someone. Get over yourselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
|
Quote:
Lmao, your so funny.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
|
Quote:
There was something of the night about Jules,didnt buy her smily smily act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
It's actually not funny at all, you might have wanted her to win but it wasn't done fairly. That's the bottom line of it. When you have such a huge amount of money, it isn't funny, it's serious.
The magician could have done with that money and was robbed. Jules & Matisse won fairly. Chase was part of her act since the semi final. Jamie wasn't that good anyway; Darcy Oake was better. |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
Quote:
You can laugh Tonix, it wasn't you robbed of 250k under false pretence.
you have to laugh at the sillyiness of what you say Jamie wasnt robbed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
|
Quote:
No one's saying that. It's the fact she didn't explicitly state that it was a different dog is what people are annoyed about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Why this was cheating to get her hands on mega money,
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,773
|
Quote:
Put it this way: if Jamie Raven took it to Judge Rinder, he'd be laughed at and told to bog off (to put it politely).
Jules & Matisse won fairly. Chase was part of her act since the semi final. Jamie wasn't that good anyway; Darcy Oake was better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
|
Quote:
Why is there such anger over 2 dogs being used in a performance of an entertainment show?
All this outrage, you'd think the woman and dog had killed someone. Get over yourselves. The magician should not take that without looking to get compensated. |
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
Just have a re run of the final without the cheat Jules, and we will have a fair winner.
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
|
Quote:
Oh dear
you have to laugh at the sillyiness of what you say Jamie wasnt robbed! |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
|
Quote:
Oh dear
you have to laugh at the sillyiness of what you say Jamie wasnt robbed! |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
She cheated the public to get 1/4 million pounds, so why is anyone defending her!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
she cheated, she used a stand in during the bike trick - I'm outraged
http://cdn.itv.com/uploads/editor/me...ec3_ihtqIs.jpg |
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
She cheated the public to get 1/4 million pounds, so why is anyone defending her!
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 18,421
|
Quote:
He was, though, and so was the Welsh choir. If people had known the act wasn't what it seemed they could very well have voted differently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 67
|
Quote:
Jamie Raven wouldn't have a leg to stand on because it wasn't HIS money and the public voted for Jules & Matisse. Jules & Matisse didn't cheat; Chase was part of their act since the semi final.
In several interviews after, with Ant & Dec, Stephen Mulhern and on Good Morning Britain they referred to it and she didn't own up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
As I said before, I voted for Jules and Matisse, I dont care if there was another dog walking on the rope, she didnt cheat me and I would vote for then all again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,693
|
Quote:
Sorry have I missed something - Why cant she use two Dogs in her Act?
Quote:
Exactly. It was won by 2.2 per cent I think. That is very close. She wouldn't have won it because it would have changed the narrative and people would not have been as touched by it.
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 14,231
|
Quote:
Just have a re run of the final without the cheat Jules, and we will have a fair winner.
This is the worst thing since the Major and the coughing on Millionnaire.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34.




