but you don't KNOW, no matter how unlikely it is, it's still possible

Lmao, your so funny.

So your happy she fooled the public to get 1/4 million pounds?

Because it was stated that the act was with one dog, and not with three.

No one's saying that. It's the fact she didn't explicitly state that it was a different dog is what people are annoyed about.

Why is there such anger over 2 dogs being used in a performance of an entertainment show?

All this outrage, you'd think the woman and dog had killed someone. Get over yourselves.

You can laugh Tonix, it wasn't you robbed of 250k under false pretence.

Glad it's not just me. I was thinking the same from the first time I saw that woman.

Put it this way: if Jamie Raven took it to Judge Rinder, he'd be laughed at and told to bog off (to put it politely).

Jules & Matisse won fairly. Chase was part of her act since the semi final. Jamie wasn't that good anyway; Darcy Oake was better.

Oh dear you have to laugh at the sillyiness of what you say Jamie wasnt robbed!

Exactly.

Jamie Raven wouldn't have a leg to stand on because it wasn't HIS money and the public voted for Jules & Matisse. Jules & Matisse didn't cheat; Chase was part of their act since the semi final.

she cheated, she used a stand in during the bike trick - I'm outraged

250k is a laughing matter to you? Life changing money to many others. I'm struggling to see the funny side to this. The more I read about this the more I find it unbelievable.

The magician should not take that without looking to get compensated.

Just have a re run of the final without the cheat Jules, and we will have a fair winner.

He was, though, and so was the Welsh choir. If people had known the act wasn't what it seemed they could very well have voted differently.

Don't know what you would call cheating then. No one voted for the actual final act because the mattise wasn't even performing. If it wasn't so ridiculous and serious, you would laugh.

She cheated the public to get 1/4 million pounds, so why is anyone defending her!

Wrong magician. Darcy Oake was this guy:

http://cdn.itv.com/uploads/editor/me...ec3_ihtqIs.jpg

Because she didn't cheat.

Exactly. It was won by 2.2 per cent I think. That is very close. She wouldn't have won it because it would have changed the narrative and people would not have been as touched by it.

But wasn't shown as part of their act in the final. He was hidden. Why? I don't know why you can't see that as being wrong.

In several interviews after, with Ant & Dec, Stephen Mulhern and on Good Morning Britain they referred to it and she didn't own up.

As I said before, I voted for Jules and Matisse, I dont care if there was another dog walking on the rope, she didnt cheat me and I would vote for then all again.

Apparently because she did not tell us, and these days we all have to be outraged about everything, I assume it wont be long before there is a helpline for those watching traumatised by acts on BGT and X Factor who claim they can sing and cannot , and for those who realise magic is not magic but illusion , and of course compensation. I actually worry for peoples grasp on reality


You think if people had known every fact of the act they would not have voted for her ?

Hear! Hear! ( but sadly I don't see much chance of that happening.)

This is the worst thing since the Major and the coughing on Millionnaire.