ah well, you get the drift anyway

Kinda did though didn't she. Are you her press agent?

Pretty much.

I'd happily vote for Jules and Matisse again.

How do you know she still woudnt of won?

Nobody was robbed - Jules with her dogs won (I don't care howe many there were she trained them all) just get over & move on Bleating on & on about it isn't going to change anything

I would as well

Because it would have ruined the narrative.


Actually, she did. On Lorraine. That's why this nonsense has even come about.

I wish I was so I could release a statement to newspapers calling everyone complaining about it idiots.

As would I.

But what was the narrative? Oh yeah. The narrative was that MATISSE was the dog and that MATISSE was the dog going across the tight rope.

So when it turns out it wasn't Matisee why can't you see why it's a con?

And I know she did on Lorraine. Three interviews too late.

so would I, if I'd bothered to vote in the first place

Idiots because of commenting about a magician getting robbed of 250k by false pretence from Jules.

Because Matisse was the character both Matisse and Chase were playing.

The fact is she performed an act, she won so that's all there is to it. I assume you would have been angry if a magician won as they win by fooling the public. I really do not get this outrage it to me is a very sad sign of todays outraged society.

I hate to bring up an argument which you seem unable to grasp, again, but......

If you're watching a film, or even a play, and there is a stunt double used, you wouldn't know or even care, so what's the difference - this was a short play using dogs and a human, one of the acting dogs used a stunt double - there's no difference

You realise this whole outrage began because SHE revealed quite openly there was a second dog, right?

Funnily enough if she had stayed quiet no one would've known.

Nothing to do with being outraged.

Stop comparing a magician and this Jules act. The magician did his act fairly and was judged on his act. Jules did her act under false pretence. A magicians job is to fool people.

For gods sake, HOW many times?! This isn't a bloody movie. This was an act that we were VOTING on to win a competition. We were voting for Matisse. So when it turns out it wasn't Matisse what do you bloody expect?!

I don't vote for someone in The X Factor only for someone else to be behind the curtain singing do I?

Stop using the whole idea of a movie. It is completely different and has no relevance whatsoever.

I agree. People voted for what they thought was the same dog doing all the tricks. It's not the fact that there were actually two but that it was carried out in such a sneaky way.

Yes thanks. Your point is?

Apparently 200 people have complained to ofcom, a dog walked a tightrope, it was not called Mattisse but it was a dog trained by the winner, there are some very very sad people out there who desperately need to get a life.

It's THE SAME as a movie. It's a dog acting like a person in a movie. And guess what? Actors have stunt doubles. So Matisse does too.

Well said!

oh yes there is a difference... this was in front of millions to win a quarter of a million... not some west end play...

It's NOT a movie, it's. a live TV show and also a competition.