|
||||||||
The mirror reports that the final should be run again! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
The mirror reports that the final should be run again!
The mirror is reporting that the view is the final should be run again, I agree in some ways, but it be more money for Cowell! So not sure, he should donate the profits to a dog charity, if it is run again.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
They're also 'reporting' that the money should go to the choir because Jamie Raven didn't really use magic to teleport a note into a lemon.
They're a bit silly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
The Mirror clearly know nothing about TV production. It would cost a fortune to rerun the final again over a silly little thing.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 493
|
People need to get out more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
it really should be, and Revelation Avenue should take that cheat Jules place.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
it really should be, and Revelation Avenue should take that cheat Jules place.
They possibly wouldn't even be able to do it for weeks because they'd have to wait until ITV can free space in their schedule. Jules & Matisse won fairly. Your favourite didn't win. Boo hoo. Get over it or get some tissues. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
The fact remains that Jules act was supposed to be with one dog, and she used three. That is cheating whatever anyone says.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
The fact remains that Jules act was supposed to be with one dog, and she used three. That is cheating whatever anyone says.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 683
|
Quote:
it really should be, and Revelation Avenue should take that cheat Jules place.
The fairest thing to do if Jules was disqualified for cheating now- is to recrown second place Jamie the winner. Why should an act who wasn't even in the final be crowned winner? They weren't even chosen as a wildcard by the public or judges! I think the Kennah masons should have been in the final but no way would I say recall the vote and make them the winner! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,280
|
No need to rerun it , just make the person with the most votes, apart from the dog act, the winner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
Quote:
What on earth? Why should revelation avenue get it?
The fairest thing to do if Jules was disqualified for cheating now- is to recrown second place Jamie the winner. Why should an act who wasn't even in the final be crowned winner? They weren't even chosen as a wildcard by the public or judges! I think the Kennah masons should have been in the final but no way would I say recall the vote and make them the winner! |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Jules has to be disqualified, and the final re run. It is the only way the public will be satisfied otherwise, and it could be the end for show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21,530
|
People love a good spot of outrage and indignation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
The fact remains that Jules act was supposed to be with one dog, and she used three. That is cheating whatever anyone says.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
No need to rerun it , just make the person with the most votes, apart from the dog act, the winner.
Jules & Matisse won. End of story. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Jules has to be disqualified, and the final re run. It is the only way the public will be satisfied otherwise, and it could be the end for show.
How do you feel? Or do you reckon you 'cheated' to win? |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
No it's not. Or are you claiming she cheated in the semi final too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,125
|
Quote:
Jules has to be disqualified, and the final re run. It is the only way the public will be satisfied otherwise, and it could be the end for show.
Like I said I can see both sides of this argument, the fact that the dog who performed that part was actually in the semi final and was introduced to us the audience makes it seem not so bad in my view , its not like its literally another dog that's been trained privately. Both dogs were trained by Jules, also I'd say it was obvious that it wasn't the same dog on the tightrope as a new dog came out to walk over the tight rope literally right after matisse went in, so unless people at the time thought it was magic I'm not sure how it would be the same dog anyway? Also her willingness to speak out and say that she was using separate dogs shows to me that she didn't feel like she was hiding anything. If anything its probably the BGT producers who made it seem this way, so I hope there isn't too much hate on Jules because of this. I can however see why people would feel "cheated", mainly because at the end of the performance there was only 2 dogs with her meaning the dog that did the tightrope wasn't shown to us viewers, I wouldn't call this fraud to be perfectly honest but I do see why some people feel annoyed at it and I do have sympathy because when you do feel cheated by a show you like it is a very very annoying feeling, I doubt the show will actually take any action on this and if they do I think there could potentially be an even bigger uproar because people who voted for Jules & Matisse will then be annoyed that there votes were used on an act that was Disqualified? If they are serious about wanting to do something surely it would have to be a re-run because purely disqualifying Jules & Matisse would like I say cause even more anger, and lets face it if there is a re-run Simon Cowell and the producers will be the big winners, however if I'm honest I doubt there will be a re-run or any kind of action taken on this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
In the Semi final, she was honest enough about the dogs. In the final she avoided showing or telling anyone about the stand-in dog until she had won the money, then she was happy enough to,do so, to me this is a cheat.
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,369
|
Quote:
And that the point, if she said after before the vote she used a stand-in my guess she not have won, and she knew that.
But I'm not sure it would have lost them votes, If after the event, the other dog had come up to take a bow and she had told us that he had done the tightrope bit because he was more comfortable with heights it might even have got them a few more votes. It's the pretence that some people don't like. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
Quote:
No it's not. People knew that Chase was part of her act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
No it's not. People knew that Chase was part of her act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Quote:
Jules has to be disqualified, and the final re run. It is the only way the public will be satisfied otherwise, and it could be the end for show.
It's not an issue, the papers are using it to generate some controversy which in turn sells more papers and Simon Cowell is rubbing his hands at all the free publicity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,125
|
Quote:
No need to rerun it , just make the person with the most votes, apart from the dog act, the winner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Quite clearly a lot of people didn't. Some people might not have watched the semi-final (I didn't).
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34.



