|
||||||||
The mirror reports that the final should be run again! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
How did they, it was not mentioned, so what the proof! Until this story broke everyone I spoke to beloved it was just the one dog.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,369
|
Quote:
No it's not. People knew that Chase was part of her act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
Quote:
Because Chase was IN their SEMI FINAL PERFORMANCE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
The fact is that Jules is a complete fraud, and there is no other way to dress it up.
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Quote:
NOT EVERYONE watched THE semi FINAL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
But in the final show, Chase didn't come on as an extra, he came on as a substitute for a major stunt and it wasn't acknowledged - even when Ant and Dec asked about Matisses tight rope training. That's called subterfuge.
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
NOT EVERYONE watched THE semi FINAL.
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Because Chase was IN their SEMI FINAL PERFORMANCE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: A Sound Expert
Posts: 13,881
|
Quote:
The fact remains that Jules act was supposed to be with one dog, and she used three. That is cheating whatever anyone says.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,369
|
Quote:
It didn't need to be acknowledged. Stunt doubles aren't acknowledged in films.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
The fact is that Jules is a complete fraud, and there is no other way to dress it up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,693
|
I really am stunned that people have so much spare time that they complain about this , is this how trivial life has become that a sodding talent show is number 1 priority and calls for fines, axings and sackings ??? sorry but its pathetic.,
As for The Mirror and the option to vote to give the money to the choir as Jamie was not performing real magic, due to a hole in the lemon well it shows the level our journalist's have sunk too. Who would ever have thought that not everything you see on TV is as it appears. How will people cope when they find out that babies in soaps are played by about 4 different kids. |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
But not in the first round, if she used both dogs in all the rounds then yes, but why would we believe 2 dogs were used when she only used the one in the first round.
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Totally irrelevant comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
Quote:
That's their fault for not being loyal to the show.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Are you kidding?
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,369
|
Quote:
And yet the magician used assistants in the semi finals, and jules used other dogs, and dancers used backing dancers etc
The point is not the participation of a 3rd dog, the point is a major stunt in the Matisse and Jules double act being undertaken by a substitute. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London
Posts: 2,539
|
If you go along that way, miming, using backing vocals, magicians, or even the producers who choses and presents established acts as newbies - all are doing some degree of fraud. I'm sure everyone knows BGT is a reality show and there has to be compromises.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
Because Chase was in their semi final performance and helped them win.
Speaking to lots of people before she broke the news the next day, all believed it was only the one clever dog in the final. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,693
|
Quote:
But the magician himself wasn't replaced by a look a like.
The point is not the participation of a 3rd dog, the point is a major stunt in the Matisse and Jules double act being undertaken by a substitute. |
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
Quote:
No. You can't not watch the semi finals, then watch the final and complain when a act features more dogs than in the title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
But that no reason to believe he was back in the final, as it was not the act title or any hint, most people asI said thought it was back to round one, with only the one dog, and in the semi she was happy to talk about both dogs, so why not after the final, she was clever enough to keep quiet until the next day when she had the prize money in her hands.
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Of course you can. I couldn't care less about an inconsequential show's winner. I'm happy for her to keep the money but from what I've read she mentioned the second dog in the semi, but didn't in the final. That's misleading at best.
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
It is. It showed Chase was part of their act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Wow I have to see the first round again, as I missed seeing Chase in that!
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16.




