|
||||||||
The mirror reports that the final should be run again! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
A silly comment to make. Chase wasn't needed for the narrative of her audition.
And why was not Chase part of the title of the act. |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North West England
Posts: 3,625
|
Quote:
No it's not. People knew that Chase was part of her act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
And again, that is my point, as the public had no idea he was needed in the final as it came across as the one dog show, if not she could have had a jail that the public could see into and see the dogs be changed, but she knew that lose her votes.
And why was not Chase part of the title of the act. It was clear Chase was in it at some point in some way because it was their final BGT performance. |
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Not for the final act they didn't. .
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
Bloody, some people really need to get over this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,019
|
Wouldn't surprise me if Kevin O'Sullivan is behind this. He has personal vendetta against BGT if you read his Twitter throughout the series.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
The fact that this has turned into a complete farce does the show no favours at all.
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North West England
Posts: 3,625
|
Quote:
Only those who didn't see the semi final and that's THEIR fault.
I liked the act btw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
But why hide chase at the end? Like I've said before I wouldn't of had a problem if she used 5 dogs let alone 3 but it just seems a bit sly to hide the so called stunt dog when he did one of the best tricks.
I liked the act btw. |
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In your house, guy's Butts
Posts: 3,194
|
Quote:
But why hide chase at the end? Like I've said before I wouldn't of had a problem if she used 5 dogs let alone 3 but it just seems a bit sly to hide the so called stunt dog when he did one of the best tricks.
I liked the act btw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
Quote:
Only those who didn't see the semi final and that's THEIR fault.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,773
|
A dog walked a tightrope, for Gods sake! Does it really matter which dog?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
For having a life outside the show?
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North West England
Posts: 3,625
|
Quote:
Because it would have ruined the narrative if we'd seen the other dog.
If chase was reveiled at the end I can't see how it would of ruined the narrative as people would of still enjoyed the act. |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,199
|
The fact remains that Jules was supposed to be performing wit one dog, and she used three. That is cheating i am afraid.
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
Jules said in the semi-final she would use other dogs, I swear some people only hear what they want to hear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,281
|
Quote:
Jules said in the semi-final she would use other dogs, I swear some people only hear what they want to hear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North West England
Posts: 3,625
|
Quote:
Jules said in the semi-final she would use other dogs, I swear some people only hear what they want to hear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,533
|
Quote:
Well I can understand peoples anger over it as they were led to believe it was the same dog.
If chase was reveiled at the end I can't see how it would of ruined the narrative as people would of still enjoyed the act. You don't see magicians revealing how they do their tricks at the end of a performance. So why should Jules have? |
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 57
|
Quote:
it really should be, and Revelation Avenue should take that cheat Jules place.
Are you part of the choir ..? Revelation Avenue couldn't even cut the vote in the semi-final ... They were beaten by Jules and Matisse and five old fella's doing some dad dancing .. Maybe that's why you are so bitter about the dog act winning ..! As for the Mirror calling for a replay, don't make me laugh, it ain't gonna' happen .. There won't be a replay because the dog act won fair and square whatever you say ... At the end of the day the show was won by an "act" ... not individuals, be it canine or human, but an act ...!! If the tightrope sequence hadn't been part of the act they still would have won and then you'd have bugger all to complain about, apart from the fact that Revelation Avenue were "robbed" as you call it ..!! Move on folks, show's over, nothing to see here ..!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Quote:
The fact remains that Jules was supposed to be performing wit one dog, and she used three. That is cheating i am afraid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
Some people didn't watch the semi final. She didn't mention it in the final.
It'd be a very annoying show to watch if every act had to explain what exactly it is they do every time they performed for the benefit of those who have tuned in to the last show of a 20 episode series. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
But I'm led to believe she told ant and dec it took a few months for matissee to learn the rope walk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 14,186
|
Quote:
Since when was she only supposed to be performing with one dog? I missed the bit where anyone said that.
Presumably they think Boyband should be disqualified for not being boys ad not being a band. And Chloe Crawford, Jamie Raven and Michael Late should be disqualified for having a number of other people (including doubles) in their act too. Plus, Jesse Jane McParland and a most other acts as it goes. Basically, disqualify everyone until Revelation Choir win. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:34.




