• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: Reality
  • Britain's Got Talent
The mirror reports that the final should be run again!
<<
<
3 of 6
>>
>
DiamondDoll
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Nate_Thomas:
“People need to get out more.”

I ain't gonna disagree.
myscimitar
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“A silly comment to make. Chase wasn't needed for the narrative of her audition.”

And again, that is my point, as the public had no idea he was needed in the final as it came across as the one dog show, if not she could have had a jail that the public could see into and see the dogs be changed, but she knew that lose her votes.
And why was not Chase part of the title of the act.
scorpionatthepc
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“No it's not. People knew that Chase was part of her act.”

Not for the final act they didn't. All 3 dogs should of been shown at the end of the act then we wouldn't of had all this.
Dalekbuster523
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by myscimitar:
“And again, that is my point, as the public had no idea he was needed in the final as it came across as the one dog show, if not she could have had a jail that the public could see into and see the dogs be changed, but she knew that lose her votes.
And why was not Chase part of the title of the act.”

Do you not think it would seem a bit strange, though, if Chase HADN'T been a part of the final performance despite being in the semi final?

It was clear Chase was in it at some point in some way because it was their final BGT performance.
Dalekbuster523
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by scorpionatthepc:
“Not for the final act they didn't. .”

Only those who didn't see the semi final and that's THEIR fault.
xTonix
02-06-2015
Bloody, some people really need to get over this.
All Of Me
02-06-2015
Wouldn't surprise me if Kevin O'Sullivan is behind this. He has personal vendetta against BGT if you read his Twitter throughout the series.
jerefprdterra
02-06-2015
The fact that this has turned into a complete farce does the show no favours at all.
scorpionatthepc
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“Only those who didn't see the semi final and that's THEIR fault.”

But why hide chase at the end? Like I've said before I wouldn't of had a problem if she used 5 dogs let alone 3 but it just seems a bit sly to hide the so called stunt dog when he did one of the best tricks.

I liked the act btw.
Dalekbuster523
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by scorpionatthepc:
“But why hide chase at the end? Like I've said before I wouldn't of had a problem if she used 5 dogs let alone 3 but it just seems a bit sly to hide the so called stunt dog when he did one of the best tricks.

I liked the act btw.”

Because it would have ruined the narrative if we'd seen the other dog.
myscimitar
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by scorpionatthepc:
“But why hide chase at the end? Like I've said before I wouldn't of had a problem if she used 5 dogs let alone 3 but it just seems a bit sly to hide the so called stunt dog when he did one of the best tricks.

I liked the act btw.”

And not mention he Chase was in on the act until she had her hands on the money!
JamieHT
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“Only those who didn't see the semi final and that's THEIR fault.”

For having a life outside the show?
callmediva
02-06-2015
A dog walked a tightrope, for Gods sake! Does it really matter which dog?
Dalekbuster523
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by JamieHT:
“For having a life outside the show?”

No. For not seeing that Chase was part of her act by religiously following the show.
scorpionatthepc
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Dalekbuster523:
“Because it would have ruined the narrative if we'd seen the other dog.”

Well I can understand peoples anger over it as they were led to believe it was the same dog.

If chase was reveiled at the end I can't see how it would of ruined the narrative as people would of still enjoyed the act.
jerefprdterra
02-06-2015
The fact remains that Jules was supposed to be performing wit one dog, and she used three. That is cheating i am afraid.
xTonix
02-06-2015
Jules said in the semi-final she would use other dogs, I swear some people only hear what they want to hear.
JamieHT
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by xTonix:
“Jules said in the semi-final she would use other dogs, I swear some people only hear what they want to hear.”

Some people didn't watch the semi final. She didn't mention it in the final.
scorpionatthepc
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by xTonix:
“Jules said in the semi-final she would use other dogs, I swear some people only hear what they want to hear.”

But I'm led to believe she told ant and dec it took a few months for matissee to learn the rope walk.
Dalekbuster523
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by scorpionatthepc:
“Well I can understand peoples anger over it as they were led to believe it was the same dog.

If chase was reveiled at the end I can't see how it would of ruined the narrative as people would of still enjoyed the act.”

Because it would have spoilt the illusion of Matisse walking the tightrope to escape prison.

You don't see magicians revealing how they do their tricks at the end of a performance. So why should Jules have?
Redcarman
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by jerefprdterra:
“it really should be, and Revelation Avenue should take that cheat Jules place.”

What's with this Revelation Avenue obsession you keep going on about ..?
Are you part of the choir ..?
Revelation Avenue couldn't even cut the vote in the semi-final ...
They were beaten by Jules and Matisse and five old fella's doing some dad dancing ..
Maybe that's why you are so bitter about the dog act winning ..!

As for the Mirror calling for a replay, don't make me laugh, it ain't gonna' happen ..
There won't be a replay because the dog act won fair and square whatever you say ...
At the end of the day the show was won by an "act" ... not individuals, be it canine or human, but an act ...!!
If the tightrope sequence hadn't been part of the act they still would have won and then you'd have bugger all to complain about, apart from the fact that Revelation Avenue were "robbed" as you call it ..!!
Move on folks, show's over, nothing to see here ..!!
dellzincht
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by jerefprdterra:
“The fact remains that Jules was supposed to be performing wit one dog, and she used three. That is cheating i am afraid.”

Since when was she only supposed to be performing with one dog? I missed the bit where anyone said that.
spkx
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by JamieHT:
“Some people didn't watch the semi final. She didn't mention it in the final.”

Then that's their fault for not getting the full picture and they've no real right to complain.

It'd be a very annoying show to watch if every act had to explain what exactly it is they do every time they performed for the benefit of those who have tuned in to the last show of a 20 episode series.
spkx
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by scorpionatthepc:
“But I'm led to believe she told ant and dec it took a few months for matissee to learn the rope walk.”

Matisse can actually do the tight rope trick too. It seems the decision to use chase was more of a production one than anything, which is also why the third dog didn't appear at the end (the set up backstage meant there was no time to get him around to the front)
spkx
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by dellzincht:
“Since when was she only supposed to be performing with one dog? I missed the bit where anyone said that.”

Some people seem to be taking the act name Jules & Matisse literally.

Presumably they think Boyband should be disqualified for not being boys ad not being a band.

And Chloe Crawford, Jamie Raven and Michael Late should be disqualified for having a number of other people (including doubles) in their act too.

Plus, Jesse Jane McParland and a most other acts as it goes.

Basically, disqualify everyone until Revelation Choir win.
<<
<
3 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map