• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Harry's got her baps out again
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
lon_chaney
02-06-2015
Harry can walk around all day long with her tits out but if thats all shes got to offer from an entertainment perspective then its going to get tiered very soon.
mysty211
02-06-2015
It seems like all she is just showing her tits or body at every opportunity just for attention.
Doesn't seem to offer much except her tits which will get boring after a while if she does this day in day out.
jp761
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by lon_chaney:
“Harry can walk around all day long with her tits out but if thats all shes got to offer from an entertainment perspective then its going to get tiered very soon.”

Yep agree there. Thats the key goes the same for the topless dudes who do that regular as well.
Bonnielad
02-06-2015
Her bust size exceeds her IQ.

Three tits and I'd get it.
Miss.D
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Littlegreen42:
“Boobs are nice.

If ya got it...”

It's not the worst sight in the world, is it?
jp761
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Miss.D:
“It's not the worst site in the world, is it? ”

You're Miss double D right ? Just keeping with theme haha
Miss.D
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by jp761:
“You're Miss double D right ? Just keeping with theme haha ”

haha

A lady never tells.
ChipDouglas82
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlett Berry:
“What the hell is wrong with that lassie..”

Nothing is wrong with her, she's just a young "lassie" having fun!

Originally Posted by Nate_Thomas:
“I hope all the nakedness doesn't get Harry evicted she is a great housemate.”

I think it's inevitable she will go as soon as she is up, since 90% of voters are women and gay men. And we know how much women like other attractive & confident women.... (not very much!!!)
Scarlett Berry
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“Nothing is wrong with her, she's just a young "lassie" having fun!



I think it's inevitable she will go as soon as she is up, since 90% of voters are women and gay men. And we know how much women like other attractive & confident women.... (not very much!!!)”

I like atractive and confident women, I think Jade is fabulous,massively attractive and confident to boot.

Chloe is a cutie and Sarah was extrememly attractive so don't lump me into that generalisation. Not keen on Harry though, all that flashing is not for me...takes all sorts I guess.
Scarlett Berry
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“Nothing is wrong with her, she's just a young "lassie" having fun!



I think it's inevitable she will go as soon as she is up, since 90% of voters are women and gay men. And we know how much women like other attractive & confident women.... (not very much!!!)”

When did exposing yourself / flashing yer bits constitute fun.
jp761
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Miss.D:
“haha

A lady never tells. ”



Unless you go on BB and show thats one option
James Frederick
02-06-2015
Guess I'll give BB a miss again tonight.
Scarlet O'Hara
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Seveneyes:
“Different genders,but ultimately the same.. Daresay some women liked the men doing it,no men on the forum were complaining as far as I saw...why are u getting irate because a woman's doing it..??”

This line of argument holds absolutely no water. Women don't get sexually excited looking at a man's exposed nipples. They don't have Page 3 boys showing just a chest and debates about whether this makes men sex objects. Men don't appear in music videos with strategically covered nipple tassels to get us all hot and bothered. They don't have women going "phwoargh look at the tits on that". We don't imagine ourselves touching and kissing them (other parts admittedly). There's no porn fetishisation of men's chests.

TV codes don't have rules about men baring their chests before the watershed. There's no national debate about whether women can breastfeed in public cos, like, men on building sites take their tops off. Actors don't need the same nudity clauses in their contracts if they're just going shirtless because it won't damage their credibility. Etc etc etc.

Its not remotely the same.
kimotag
02-06-2015
I'm getting bored with Harry's tits already.
Scarlett Berry
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by kimotag:
“I'm getting bored with Harry's tits already.”

Beware kimotag...if you're a woman you'll be called jellus...an earlier thread said women don't like attractive women...bl**dy cheek.
Scarlet O'Hara
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by jp761:
“Boobs are just fatty flesh obviously. It could be argued that women who show there boobs often are really no different to guys topless often. Why do we think guys who are overweight it's said that they have moobs.

.”

It could be argued, yes, but it would be completely removed from a long cultural/societal/psychological history of women's breasts as a source of sexual interest and pleasure.

I may just have "two lumps of flesh' but exposing them gets a completely different response than my elbows.

Harry isnt a nudist with a dispassionate Scandinavian view of the naked body. She knows they're sexually enticing and exposes them with that intention and a giggle. Which is fair enough BTW. But let's not distract with a straw man.
onfencewithrach
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlet O'Hara:
“This line of argument holds absolutely no water. Women don't get sexually excited looking at a man's exposed nipples. They don't have Page 3 boys showing just a chest and debates about whether this makes men sex objects. Men don't appear in music videos with strategically covered nipple tassels to get us all hot and bothered. They don't have women going "phwoargh look at the tits on that". We don't imagine ourselves touching and kissing them (other parts admittedly). There's no porn fetishisation of men's chests.

TV codes don't have rules about men baring their chests before the watershed. There's no national debate about whether women can breastfeed in public cos, like, men on building sites take their tops off. Actors don't need the same nudity clauses in their contracts if they're just going shirtless because it won't damage their credibility. Etc etc etc.

Its not remotely the same.”

I agree it's not exactly the same thing but disagree that females can't/don't get excited by shirtless males. Especially the abs. I see girls having shirtless males on their walls, on the show Arrow for example females on social media go crazy for scenes where the male leads have no shirts on... there's some similar discussion that i've seen going on from females about males abs/chest like how some guys talk of girls bodies.

Again, i do agree with your general point in that it's not exactly the same thing for a male to expose his bare chest that it is for a female to do so.... but i would possibly say that a female showing her cleavage could be along the same lines as male having his shirt off, something to that extent.
Scarlet O'Hara
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by onfencewithrach:
“I agree it's not exactly the same thing but disagree that females can't/don't get excited by shirtless males. Especially the abs. I see girls having shirtless males on their walls, on the show Arrow for example females on social media go crazy for scenes where the male leads have no shirts on... there's some similar discussion that i've seen going on from females about males abs/chest like how some guys talk of girls bodies.

Again, i do agree with your general point in that it's not exactly the same thing for a male to expose his bare chest that it is for a female to do so.... but i would possibly say that a female showing her cleavage could be along the same lines as male having his shirt off, something to that extent.”

Its the nipples and complete exposure that I'm talking about so I agree with your last sentence: cleavage is similar to abs out. When a straight woman appreciates a man's bare chest, she's appreciating muscle, hardness, virility, manliness, skin tone, colour, hair or no hair etc, but we're not having a primitive "phwoargh id love to get my hands or mouth on those". We may TALK about men's bodies in similar ways, but seriously, what straight woman do you know gets a sexual kick simply from looking at a chest just on its own? It's not really a 'rude' interest, for want of a better word.
kaceyy
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“Nothing is wrong with her, she's just a young "lassie" having fun!
”

I think this is what I've found most interesting lately, the downright prudishness that was shown towards Adjoa, her reasons for being disliked? Announcing her sexuality and saying some vulgar things (apprently).. Such hatred was shown on her eviction, on her launch night and on this very site.. Some said this may be prejudiced some argued this wasn't the case..

Fair enough.. So Adjoa hated, despised to the point she was considered a slut for a few vulgar remarks, two weeks pass.. A dominatrix enters, announces the only thing she can offer the house is her breasts, has been nude on several occasions and has a seemingly vulgar personality (from the prudes perspective) and yet somehow i see no outrage.. All of sudden no one has an issue with all the overtly sexual antics, always interesting to see how different housemates are treated on here .
lulu g
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“Nothing is wrong with her, she's just a young "lassie" having fun!



I think it's inevitable she will go as soon as she is up, since 90% of voters are women and gay men. And we know how much women like other attractive & confident women.... (not very much!!!)”

Funnily enough, none of the attractive and confident women I know, some of whom I like very much, feel the need to 'get their baps out' at the drop of a hat.
SneakyBoo
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlett Berry:
“I like atractive and confident women, I think Jade is fabulous,massively attractive and confident to boot.

Chloe is a cutie and Sarah was extrememly attractive so don't lump me into that generalisation. Not keen on Harry though, all that flashing is not for me...takes all sorts I guess.”

I'm female and I also like attractive confident women, I actually like Harry Amelia but I don't see her constant flashing as confident, quite the opposite actually. that aside I think she could be a really good housemate.... hell I like all the confident women always have in the BBhouse especially. I love jade and I liked how Sarah was so confident, in fact I think all the girls have been quite confident this year especially which is a great thing to see.
kimotag
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Scarlett Berry:
“Beware kimotag...if you're a woman you'll be called jellus...an earlier thread said women don't like attractive women...bl**dy cheek.”

I'm a bloke, and a straight one at that.
Sylvia
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by Nate_Thomas:
“I hope all the nakedness doesn't get Harry evicted she is a great housemate.”

Really? What has she done besides talk crude and get naked?
kaceyy
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by mysty211:
“It seems like all she is just showing her tits or body at every opportunity just for attention.
Doesn't seem to offer much except her tits which will get boring after a while if she does this day in day out.”

Part of me is thinking this may have been why she was booked for the show, I've been reading alot on the viewing figures being shockingly low since Big. Brother was up against BGT. Interesting that since the show ended this weekend, that's when all of a sudden things have 'spiced up'.. Kind of sad to be honest.
Sylvia
02-06-2015
Originally Posted by ChipDouglas82:
“I think it's inevitable she will go as soon as she is up, since 90% of voters are women and gay men. And we know how much women like other attractive & confident women.... (not very much!!!)”

Not when they behave like tramps, no.
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map